In this article, we present GoCrystal, a new visual analytics tool for analysis and visualization of atomic configurations and thermodynamic energy models. GoCrystal’s primary objective is to support the visual analytics tasks for finding and understanding favorable atomic patterns in a lattice using gamification. We believe the performance of visual analytics tasks can be improved by employing gamification features. Careful research was conducted in an effort to determine which gamification features would be more applicable for analyzing and exploring atomic configurations and their associated thermodynamic free energy. In addition, we conducted a user study to determine the effectiveness of GoCrystal and its gamification features in achieving this goal, comparing with a conventional visual analytics model without gamification as a control group. Finally, we report the results of the user study and demonstrate the impact that gamification features have on the performance and time necessary to understand atomic configurations.
TakahashiKTanakaY. Materials informatics: a journey towards material design and synthesis. Dalton T2016; 45(26): 10497–10499.
2.
RajanK. Informatics for materials science and engineering: data-driven discovery for accelerated experimentation and application. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013.
3.
ThomasJJ. Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics. New York: IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
4.
DeterdingSSicartMNackeL, et al. Gamification: Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In: CHI’11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12 May 2011, pp. 2425–2428. New York: ACM.
5.
PerssonKHinumaYMengYS, et al. Thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the Li-graphite system from first-principles calculations. Physical Review B2010; 82(12): 125416.
6.
LeeEPrinzFBCaiW. Ab initio kinetic Monte Carlo model of ionic conduction in bulk yttria-stabilized zirconia. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng2012; 20(6): 065006.
7.
LeeEIddirHBenedekR. Rapidly convergent cluster expansion and application to lithium ion battery materials. Phys Rev B2017; 95(8): 085134.
8.
DudarevSLBottonGASavrasovSY, et al. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+ U study. Phys Rev B1998; 57(3): 1505.
IzumiFMommaK. Three-dimensional visualization in powder diffraction. Solid State Phenom2007; 130: 15–20.
15.
MommaKIzumiF. An integrated three-dimensional visualization system Vesta using wxWidgets. Comm Crystallogr Comput IUCr Newslett2006; 7: 106–119.
16.
ValleMOganovAR. Crystal structures classifier for an evolutionary algorithm structure predictor. In: 2008 IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology, Columbus, OH, 19–24 October 2008, pp. 11–18. New York: IEEE.
17.
KankanhalliATaherMCavusogluH, et al. Gamification: a new paradigm for online user engagement. In: Thirty third international conference on information systems (ICIS), Orlando, FL, 16–19 December 2012.
18.
DomínguezANSaenz-de-NavarreteJDe-MarcosL, et al. Gamifying learning experiences: practical implications and outcomes. Comput Educ2013; 63: 380–392.
19.
ThomJMillenDDiMiccoJ. Removing gamification from an enterprise SNS. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, Seattle, WA, 11–15 February 2012, pp. 1067–1070. New York: ACM.
20.
AhmedNMuellerK. Gamification as a paradigm for the evaluation of visual analytics systems. In: Proceedings of the fifth workshop on beyond time and errors: Novel evaluation methods for visualization, Paris, 10 November 2014, pp. 78–86. New York: ACM.
21.
DiakopoulosNKivran-SwaineFNaamanM. Playable data: characterizing the design space of game-y infographics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12 May 2011, pp. 1717–1726. New York: ACM.
22.
HuotariKHamariJ.Defining gamification: a service marketing perspective. In: Proceedings of the 16th international academic MindTrek conference, Tampere, 3–5 October 2012, pp. 17–22. New York: ACM.
23.
Fui-HoonNah FZengQTelaproluVR, et al. Gamification of education: a review of literature. In: International conference on HCI in business, Heraklion, 22–27 June 2014, pp. 401–409. Cham: Springer.
24.
FarleyPC. Using the computer game “foldit” to entice students to explore external representations of protein structure in a biochemistry course for nonmajors. Biochem Mol Biol Educ2013; 41(1): 56–57.
IBM Research. Hello quantum: a puzzle game designed to teach introductory principles of quantum computing, https://helloquantum.mybluemix.net/ (2019, accessed 1 September 2019).
RobertsJC. State of the art: coordinated & multiple views in exploratory visualization. In: Fifth international conference on coordinated and multiple views in exploratory visualization (CMV 2007), Zurich, 2 July 2007, pp. 61–71. New York: IEEE.
31.
HunickeRLeBlancMZubekR.MDA: a formal approach to game design and game research. In: Proceedings of the AAAI workshop on challenges in game AI, San Jose, CA, 25–26 July 2004.
CoreyRBPaulingL. Molecular models of amino acids, peptides, and proteins. Rev Sci Instrum1953; 24(8): 621–627.
34.
DavidsonSBFreireJ.Provenance and scientific workflows: challenges and opportunities. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 9–12 June 2008, pp. 1345–1350. New York: ACM.
35.
KirshDMaglioP. On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cogn Sci1994; 18(4): 513–549.
36.
MaglioPPKirshD.Epistemic action increases with skill. In: Proceedings of the eighteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society, vol. 16, San Diego, CA, 12–15 July 1996, pp. 391–396. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
NakamuraJCsikszentmihalyiM. The concept of flow. In: CsikszentmihalyiM. (ed.) Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Dordrecht: Springer2014, pp. 239–263.
38.
CooperJOHeronTEHewardWL, et al. Applied behavior analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill-Prentice Hall, 2007.
39.
SchellJ. The art of game design: A book of lenses. Boca Raton, FL: AK Peters/CRC Press, 2019.
40.
SalenKTekinbaşKSZimmermanE. Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2004.
41.
RamprasadRBatraRPilaniaG, et al. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. NPJ Comput Mat2017; 3(1): 1–13.
42.
CheungGKZimmermannTNagappanN. The first hour experience: how the initial play can engage (or lose) new players. In: Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, Toronto, ON, Canada, 19–21 October 2014, pp. 57–66. New York: ACM.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
