AndrienkoGAndrienkoNFuchsGet al. Revealing patterns and trends of mass mobility through spatial and temporal abstraction of origin-destination movement data. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2017; 23(9): 2120–2136.
7.
LaZerteSEReudinkMWOtterKAet al. feedr and animalnexus.ca: a paired R package and user-friendly web application for transforming and visualizing animal movement data from static stations. Ecol Evol2017; 7: 7884–7896.
8.
PapastamatiouYPWatanabeYYDemšarUet al. Activity seascapes highlight central place foraging strategies in marine predators that never stop swimming. Mov Ecol2018; 6: 9.
9.
GuoD.Visual analytics of spatial interaction patterns for pandemic decision support. Int J Geogr Inf Sci2007; 21(8): 859–877.
10.
GuoD.Flow mapping and multivariate visualization of large spatial interaction data. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2009; 15(6): 1041–1048.
11.
SteinMJanetzkoHLamprechtAet al. Bring it to the pitch: combining video and movement data to enhance team sport analysis. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2018; 24(1): 13–22.
12.
PileggiHStolperCDBoyleJMet al. SnapShot: visualization to propel ice hockey analytics. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2012; 18(12): 2819–2828.
13.
SlingsbyAVan LoonEE.Exploratory visual analysis for animal movement ecology. Comput Graph Forum2016; 35(3): 471–480.
14.
SlingsbyAVan LoonEE. Characterisation of temporal occupancy for movement ecology. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Visualisation in Environmental Sciences (EnvirVis), Barcelona, 12–13 June 2017.
15.
SlingsbyAvan LoonEE. Temporal tile-maps for characterising the temporal occupancy of places: a seabird case study. In: Proceedings of the Geographical Information Science Research UK Conference (GISRUK 2017). Manchester, 18–21 April 2017.
16.
XavierGDodgeS. An exploratory visualization tool for mapping the relationships between animal movement and the environment. In: Proceedings of ACM MapInteract’14, 4–7 November 2014, Dallas/Fort Worth, TX. New York: ACM.
KonzackMMcKetterickTOpheldersTet al. Visual analytics of delays and interaction in movement data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci2017; 31(2): 320–345.
19.
AndrienkoGAndrienkoNChenWet al. Visual analytics of mobility and transportation: state of the art and further research directions. IEEE T Intell Transp2017; 18(8): 2232–2249.
20.
GraserAWidhalmP.Modelling massive AIS streams with quad trees and Gaussian mixtures. In: Proceedings of AGILE 2018, Lund, 12–15 June 2018.
21.
TraceyJASheppardJKZhuJet al. Movement-based estimation and visualization of space use in 3D for wildlife ecology and conservation. PLoS ONE2014; 9(7): e101205.
22.
DemsarULongJA.Time-geography in four dimensions: potential path volumes around 3D trajectories. In: Proceedings of GIScience 2016, Montreal, QC, Canada, 27–30 September 2016.
23.
FerrariniAGiglioGPellegrinoSPet al. A new methodology for computing birds’ 3D home ranges. Avian Res2018; 9: 19
24.
RamamurthySRRoyN.Recent trends in machine learning for human activity recognition: a survey. Wires Data Min Knowl Discov2018; 8: e1254.
25.
WilliamsHHoltonMDShepardELCet al. Identification of animal movement patterns using tri-axial magnetometry. Mov Ecol2017; 5: 6.
26.
StienenEDesmetPAeltermanBet al. GPS tracking data of Lesser Black-backed Gulls and Herring Gulls breeding at the southern North Sea coast. Zookeys2016; 555: 115–124.
27.
KonzackMGijsbersPTimmersFet al. Visual exploration of migration patterns in gull data. Infor Vis2019; 18(1): 138–152.
28.
SedlmairMMeyerMMunznerT.Design study methodology: reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2012; 18(12): 2431–2440.
29.
GraserASchmidtJRothFet al. Untangling origin-destination flows in geographic information systems. Infor Vis2019; 18(1) 153–172.
30.
WoodJDykesJSlingsbyA.Visualisation of origins, destinations and flows with OD maps. Cartogr J2010; 47(2): 117–129.
31.
LochheadIMHedleyN.Modeling evacuation in institutional space: linking three-dimensional data capture, simulation, analysis, and visualization workflows for risk assessment and communication. Infor Vis 2019; 18(1): 173�192.
32.
WalkerJSJonesMWLarameeRSet al. TimeClassifier: a visual analytic system for the classification of multi-dimensional time series data. Vis Comput2015; 31: 1067–1078.
33.
RobinsonACDemšarUMooreABet al. Geospatial big data and cartography: research challenges and opportunities for making maps that matter. Int J Cartogr2017; 3(1): 32–60.
34.
LiSDragicevicSCastroFAet al. Geospatial big data handling theory and methods: a review and research challenges. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens2016; 115: 119–133.
35.
HamptonSEAndersonSSBagbySCet al. The Tao of open science for ecology. Ecosphere2015; 6(7): 120.
36.
LongJAWeibelRDodgeSet al. Moving ahead with computational movement analysis. Int J Geogr Inf Sci2018; 32(7): 1275–1281.