This article details our findings from focus groups with social workers in Sweden and Canada illuminating similarities and differences in the process of social intervention in child mal-treatment. We identified six categories that form the bases for hypothesizing different orientations of child welfare and child protection: Gate Keeping; Skills in Context; Client Identity; Decision Points; Compulsion; and Measures. We analysed participants’ descriptions and uncovered how these descriptions of social intervention in child maltreatment connect to model orientations in both countries. In Swedish child welfare, there is a greater readiness to intervene with more resources and measures, intervention is assessment driven and focuses on family preservation. In Canadian child protection, only the most needy children are eligible for a limited range of services, intervention is structure driven and more narrowly focused on protection and permanency planning. The implications of these findings to social work are discussed.
Abrahamson, Peter
(1997) ‘The Scandinavian Social Service State in Comparison’, in Jorma Sipilä (ed.) Social Care Services: The Key to the Scandinavian Welfare Model, pp. 156-177. Aldershot: Avebury.
2.
Agathonos-Georgopoulou, Helen
(1998) ‘Future Outlook for Child Protection Policies in Europe’, Child Abuse and Neglect22(4): 239-247.
3.
Alber, Jens
(1995) ‘A Framework for the Comparative Study of Social Services’, Journal of European Social Policy5(2): 131-149.
4.
Barth, Richard P.
(1992) ‘Child Welfare Services in the United States and Sweden: Different Assumptions, Laws and Outcomes’, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare1(1): 36-42.
5.
Berk, Richard A.
and Rossi, Peter H. (1990) Thinking about Program Evaluation. London: Sage.
6.
DePanfilis, Diane
and Scannapieco, Maria (1994) ‘Assessing the Safety of Children at Risk of Maltreatment: Decision-making Models’, Child Welfare73(3): 229-245.
7.
DeVault, Marjorie L.
and McCoy, Liza (2002) ‘Institutional Ethnography. Using Interviews to Investigate Ruling Relations’, in Jaber. F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein (eds) Handbook of Interview Research, pp. 751-776. London: Sage.
8.
Drury-Hudson, Julie
(1999) ‘Decision Making in Child Protection: The Use of Theoretical, Empirical, and Procedural Knowledge by Novices and Experts and Implications for Fieldwork Placement’, British Journal of Social Work29(1): 147-169.
9.
Esping-Andersen, Gösta
(1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
Feagan, Joe R.
, Orum, Anthony M., and Sjoberg, Gideon (eds) (1991) A Case for the Case Study. London: The University of North Carolina Press.
11.
Ferguson, Harry
(2001) ‘Promoting Child Protection, Welfare and Healing: The Case for Developing Best Practice’, Child and Family Social Work6(1): 1-12.
12.
Hessle, Sven
, Ioka, Ben and Yamano, Naomi (1996) Family Policy and Child Welfare in Japan and Sweden: Some Considerations Regarding Comparisons on Child Welfare, Vol. 11. Stockholm: Stockholm Studies in Social Work.
13.
Hetherington, Rachael
(1998) ‘Issues in European Child Protection Research’, European Journal of Social Work1(2): 71-82.
14.
Hetherington, Rachael
and Piquart, Rolf (2001) ‘Strategies for Survival: Users’ Experience of Child Welfare in Three Welfare Regimes’, Child and Family Social Work6(3): 239-248.
15.
Hill, Malcolm
, Stafford, Ann and Green Lister, Pamela (eds) (2002) International Perspectives on Child Protection. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
16.
Jack, Gordon
(1997) ‘Discourses of Child Protection and Child Welfare’, British Journal of Social Work27(5): 659-678.
17.
Jentsch, Birgit
(1998) ‘The “Interpreter Effect”: Rendering Interpreters Visible in Cross-cultural Research and Methodology’, Journal of European Social Policy8(4): 275-289.
18.
Karski, Ruth L.
(1999) ‘Key Decisions in Child Protective Services: Report Investigation and Court Referral’, Children and Youth Services Review21(8): 643-656.
19.
KommitténVälfärdsbokslut
(2001) ‘Välfärdstjänster i omvandling’ [Welfare Services in Transition], SOU 2001: 52. Stockholm: Fritzes.
20.
Longlade, Patricia
(1999) ‘Evaluating Child Homicide Inquests as a Learning Process: A Social Constructionist Analysis of a Canadian Experience’, Child and Youth Services Review21(4): 295-310.
21.
Marneffe, Catherine
(1996) ‘Child Abuse Treatment: A Fallow Land’, Child Abuse and Neglect20(5): 379-384.
22.
Morgan, D. L.
(1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, Vol. 16. London: Sage.
23.
Nordlund, Anders (2002) ‘Resilient Welfare States: Nordic Welfare State Development in the Late 20th Century’, unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of Sociology, Umeå University, Umeå.
24.
Norström, Carl
, and Thunved, Anders (1996) Nya Sociallagarna - med kommentarer, lagar och författningar som de lyder den 1 juli 1996 [The New Social Laws - with Commentary, Laws and Statutes effective 1 July 1996]. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
25.
OACAS
(2000a) Ontario Child Welfare Eligibility Spectrum. Toronto: Ontario Association of Children’s Aid Societies.
26.
OACAS
(2000b) ‘Consortium Receives Grant for Looking After Children Research’, OACAS Journal44(3): 28-29.
27.
OACAS
(2001) ‘Frequently Asked Questions. What is a CAS?’, http://www.oacas.org/resources/whatisacas.html (consulted Nov. 2001).
28.
Oxman-Martinez, Jacqueline
(1998) ‘Client Outcomes in Child Welfare. Key Informant Interviews’, in Joan Thompson and Barbara Fallon (eds) The First Canadian Roundtable on Child Welfare Outcomes, pp. 27-29. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
29.
Parton, Nigel
(1998) ‘Risk, Advanced Liberalism and Child Welfare: The Need to Rediscover Uncertainty and Ambiguity’, British Journal of Social Work28(1): 5-27.
30.
Pierson, Paul
(2001) ‘Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies’, in Paul Pierson (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State, pp. 410-456. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Schilling, Robert F.
(1997) ‘Developing Intervention Research Programs in Social Work’, Social Work Research21(3): 173-181.
32.
Scott, Dorothy
(1998) ‘A Qualitative Study of Social Work Assessment in Cases of Alleged Child Abuse’, British Journal of Social Work28(1): 73-88.
33.
Smith, Dorothy E.
(1990) Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. New York: Routledge.
34.
Socialstyrelsen
(1996) Social service, vård och omsorg i Sverige 1996 [The Social Services and Care in Sweden 1996]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
35.
Socialstyrelsen
(1997) Tillämpningen av lagen (1990:52) med särskilda bestämmelser om vård av unga [Application of the Care of Young People Act (1990:52)]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsens Författningssamling.
36.
Socialstyrelsen
. (2000) Dartingtonprojektet: En försöksverksamhet för att stärka och utveckla familjevården [The Dartington Project: A Pilot Study to Strengthen and Develop Family(foster) Care]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen, SoS-rapport 2000:2.
37.
Soydan, Haluk
(1995) ‘A Cross-cultural Comparison of how Social Workers in Sweden and England Assess a Migrant Family’, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare4(2): 85-93.
38.
Soydan, Haluk
, and Stål, Rolf (1994) ‘How to use the Vignette Technique in Cross-cultural Social Work Research’, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare3(2): 75-80.
39.
Spratt, Trevor
(2001) ‘The Influence of Child Protection Orientation on Child Welfare Practice’, British Journal of Social Work31(6): 933-954.
40.
Swift, Karen J.
(1997) ‘Canada: “Trends and Issues in Child Welfare”’, in Neil Gilbert (ed.) Combatting Child Abuse: International Perspectives and Trends, pp. 38-71. London: Oxford University Press.
41.
Townsend, Elizabeth A.
(1996) ‘Institutional Ethnography: A Method for Analyzing Practice’, Occupational Therapy Journal of Research16(3): 179-199.
42.
Trocmé, Nico
(1999) ‘Canadian Child Welfare Multi-Dimensional Outcomes Framework and Incremental Measurement Development Strategy’, in Joan Thompson and Barbara Fallon (eds) The First Canadian Roundtable on Child Welfare Outcomes, pp. 30-53. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
43.
Van de Vijver, Fons
, and Leung, Kwok (1997) Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. London: Sage.
44.
Wells, Susan J.
, Fluke, John D. and Hendricks Brown, C. (1995) ‘The Decision to Investigate: Child Protection Practice in 12 Local Agencies’, Children and Youth Services Review17(4): 523-546.
45.
Weightman, Keith O.
and Weightman, A. (1995) ‘“Never Right, Never Wrong”: Child Welfare and Social Work in England and Sweden’, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare4(2): 75-84.
46.
Östberg, Francesca
, Wåhlander, Eva, and Milton, Pia (2000) Barnavårdsutredningar i Sex Kommuner: en vinjettsudie [Child Welfare Investigations in Six Municipalities: A Vignette Study] (3). Stockholm: CUS-skrift 2000:3.
