Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Much anecdotal information exists about problems in courts adjudicating child welfare (CW) cases. However, little empirical research across courts, court divisions, and CW cases exists. Method: This study reports the results of a two-stage study of courts and the CW system. Stage 1 used direct, systematic court observations to identify critical features of effective and problematic courts. The second stage used interviews with judges, CWagency attorneys, and staff to identify factors that facilitate or impede timely safety and permanency decisions for children. Results: The results well document the need for making changes in the functioning of courts in CW cases. Implications for the continuing professional development of CW staff, improving the effectiveness of courts, CWpractice, and future research are discussed.

Keywords

child welfare court child welfare/court relationship child protection/courts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adoption and Safe Families Act, 105 U.S.C. § 89 (1997).

Adoption Assistance and Child welfare Act, 96 U.S.C. § 272 (1980).

American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law . (1998). Court improvement progress report. Washington, DC: Author.

Costin, L. , Karger, H. ,& Stoesz, D. (1996). The politics of child abuse and neglect in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cyphers, G. (2001). Report from the Child Welfare Workforce Survey: State and county data and findings. Washington, DC: American Public Human Services Association.

Ellett, A. J. (2000). Human caring, self-efficacy beliefs and professional organizational culture correlates of employee retention in child welfare. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.

Ellett, A. J. , Ellett, C. D. , & Rugutt, J. K. (2003). Final report of personal and organizational factors contributing to employee retention and turnover in child welfare in Georgia. Athens: University of Georgia.

Hardin, M. (1993). Howto work with your court: A guide for child welfare agency administrators. Washington, DC: ABA Center on Children and the Law.

Hardin, M. , Rubin, H. T. , & Baker, D. (1995). A second court that works: Judicial implementation of permanency planning reforms. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law.

10.

Johnson, P. ,& Cahn, K. (1993, March-April). Improving child welfare practice through improvements in attorney-social worker relationships. Child Welfare, 72(2), 383-304.

11.

Kamerman, S. B. , & Kahn, A. K. (1990). Social services for children, youth, and families in the United States. Children and Youth Services Review, 12(1-2), 1-184.

12.

Katz, L. , Spoonemore, N. ,& Robinson, C. (1994). Courtwise: Making optimal use of the legal process to insure early permanence for children. Seattle, WA: Lutheran Social Services of Washington and Idaho.

13.

LeCompte, M. D. ,& Goetz, J. P. (1982). Ethnographic data collection in evaluation research. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 387-400.

14.

Leighninger, L. ,& Ellett, A. (1998, February). De-professionalization in child welfare: Historical analysis and implications for social work education. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of Council on Social Work Education, Orlando, FL.

15.

Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

16.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: CA: Sage.

17.

Russel, R. (1986). Perceptions of caseworkers and attorneys in child abuse and neglect cases in juvenile court. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.

18.

Russel, R. (1988). Role perceptions of attorneys and caseworkers in child abuse cases in juvenile court. Child Welfare, 67(3), 205-216.

19.

Tashakkori, A. ,& Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining the qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

20.

U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO) . (2003). HHS could play a greater role in helping child welfare agencies recruit and retain staff. Washington, DC: Author.

Child Welfare and the Courts: A Statewide Study With Implications for Professional Development,Practice,and Change

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References