Social work qualitative research and the work of Norman Denzin have much in common. Norman’s work was values-based, built on notions of justice, care, dignity, worth, equality, and self-determination with the purpose of identifying and describing problematic social conditions and, in turn, taking action to bring about social change and transformation. This statement fits social work perfectly. In this article, I describe the work of Norman Denzin, show how he promoted qualitative social work research, and how his suggestions for social work researchers to incorporate critical perspectives in our work was calling us back to ourselves. Most of all, he affirmed what we were already doing and want to do better.
DenzinNK (2002) Social work in the seventh moment. Qualitative Social Work1(1): 25–38.
2.
FlexnerA (1915) Is social work a profession? In: Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections. Chicago: National Conference of Charities and Corrections, pp. 576–590. Reprinted in Research on Social Work Practice, 11(2), 2001, 152-165.
3.
GilgunJF (1983) The sexual abuse of the young female in life course perspectiveChild and Family Studies - Dissertations, p. 55. https://surface.syr.edu/cfs_etd/55
4.
GilgunJF (1992) Definitions, methods, and methodologies in qualitative family research. In: GilgunJFDalyKHandelG (eds), Qualitative Methods in Family Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 22–41.
5.
GilgunJF (1999) Methodological pluralism and qualitative family research. In: SteinmetzSKSussmanMBPetersonGW (eds). Handbook of Marriage and the Family (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum, 219–261.
6.
GilgunJF (2005) Qualitative research and family psychology. Journal of Family Psychology19(1): 40–50.
7.
GilgunJF (2012) Enduring themes in qualitative family research. Journal of Family Theory and Review4: 80–95.
8.
GilgunJF (2013) Hand into glove: grounded theory, deductive qualitative analysis and social work research and practice. In: FortuneAEReidWMillerR (eds), Qualitative Methods in Social Work. 2nd edition. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 107–134.
9.
GilgunJF (2014) Chicago School Traditions: Deductive Qualitative Analysis and Grounded Theory. Amazon.
10.
GilgunJF (2015a) Beyond description to interpretation and theory in qualitative social work research. Qualitative Social Work14: 741–752.
11.
GilgunJF (2015b) Research and theory building in social work. In: NicholsW (ed), Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edition. New York: Elselvier, pp. 502–507.
12.
GilgunJF (2019) Deductive qualitative analysis and grounded theory: sensitizing concepts and hypothesis testing. In: BryantACharmazK (eds), The Sage Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 107–122.
13.
GilgunJF (2020) Writing up qualitative research. In: LeavyP (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods (2nd 3d). New York: Oxford, pp. 658–676.
14.
GilgunJF (2022) Designing qualitative social work research. In: FlickU (ed), Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Design. London: Sage, vol. 1, pp. 1097–1112.
15.
GilgunJFAbramsL (2002) Commentary on Denzin: the nature and usefulness of qualitative social work research. Qualitative Social Work1(1): 39–55.
16.
GilgunJFMcLeodL (1999) Gendering violence. Studies in Symbolic Interactionism22: 167–193.
17.
MargolinL (1997) Under the Cover of Kindness: The Invention of Social Work. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
18.
MillsCW (1969) The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford.
19.
SchwandtTA (2000) Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 189–213.
