How Twitter is changing the meaning of scholarly impact and engagement: Implications for qualitative social work research

Abstract

Social media technologies continue to change the academic landscape. Twitter has become particularly popular in research arenas including social work and is being used for fieldwork, knowledge mobilization activities, advocacy, and professional networking. Although there has been some consideration of the benefits and risks of using social media in academia, little has been written from a qualitative social work perspective. Drawing on the example of Twitter, this article redresses this gap in the literature, by exploring how social media is changing the way research is conducted and promoted in relation to (1) measuring scholarly impact via altmetrics; (2) engaging with research participants; (3) networking and making collegial connections; and (4) advocating for social issues in the public realm. As we highlight tensions in each of these four areas, a key concern is how and for whom social media is contributing to the changing meaning of scholarly impact and engagement in research communities. We draw specific attention to how the inequalities that exist in academia writ large may be amplified on social media thus affecting overall engagement and perceived impact for researchers from marginalized social locations (e.g. gender, race, sexual orientation). We conclude by discussing specific implications of using social media in qualitative social work research and provide suggestions for future areas of inquiry.

Keywords

Social media Twitter impact engagement altmetrics advocacy qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2016) Publishing in the neoliberal universe and university. In: 12th international congress of qualitative inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, May 2016.

Armstrong

(2010) The Double-Ghetto: Canadian Women and Their Segregated Work, 3rd ed. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.

Boddy

Dominelli

(2017) Social media and social work: The challenges of a new ethical space. Australian Social Work 70: 172–184.

Brossard

(2013) New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 14096–14101.

Burns

MacDonald

Carvevale

(2018) Epistemelogical bootcamp and the road to awakening: A boot camp, a Twitter storm, and a call to action! International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17: 1–6.

Canadian Association of Social Work [CASW] (2014a) Social media use and social work practice. Available at: https://casw-acts.ca/sites/casw-acts.ca/files/documents/social_media_use_and_social_work_practice.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).

Canadian Association of Social Work Education [CASWE] (2014b) Standards for accreditation. Available at: http://caswe-acfts.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/CASWE-ACFTS-Standards-11-2014.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2013) Social media for population and public health researchers. Available at: www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/47185.html (accessed 14 December 2016).

Caplan

Purser

(2017) Qualitative inquiry using social media: A field-tested example. Qualitative Social Work 18(3): 417–435.

10.

Chan

Holosko

(2017) The utilization of social media for youth outreach engagement: A case study. Qualitative Social Work 16: 680–697.

11.

Cheek

(2018) The marketization of research: Implications for qualitative inquiry. In: Denzin

Lincoln

(eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.322–340.

12.

Cheek

Garnham

Quan

(2006) What’s in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers). Qualitative Health Research 16: 423–435.

13.

Clark

Thompson

(2016) Five tips for writing qualitative research in high-impact journals: Moving from #BMJnoQual. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 15. Available at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1609406916641250 (accessed 1 June 2018).

14.

Duke

Sitter

Boggan

(2018). Sex work and social media: Online advocacy strategies. Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry 10(1).

15.

Effing

Van Hillegersberg

Huibers

(2011) Social media and political participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems. In: Tambouris E, Macintosh A and de Bruijn H (eds) Electronic Participation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

16.

Eysenbach

(2011) Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13: e123.

17.

Greenhalgh

Annadale

Ashcroft

, et al. (2016) An open letter to the BMJ editors on qualitative research. British Medical Journal 352: i563.

18.

Grundy

(2017) A history of white violence tells us attacks on black academics are not ending (I know because it happened to me). Ethnic and Racial Studies 40(11): 1864–1871.

19.

Hall

(2014) The Kardashian index: A measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists. Genome Biology 15: 424.

20.

Hernández

(2015) #hermandad: Twitter as a counter-space for Latina doctoral students. Journal of College and Character 16: 124–130.

21.

Holmberg

Thelwall

(2014) Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics 101: 1027–1042.

22.

Jackson

(2016) Digital technology in social work practice. In: The Knowledge Exchange Blog. Available at: https://theknowledgeexchangeblog.com/2016/02/19/digital-technology-in-social-work-practice/ (accessed 1 November 2016).

23.

Jalali

Wood

(2013) Tweeting during conferences: Educational or just another distraction? Medical education 47: 1129–1130.

24.

Jaschik

(2015a) Does this thing have an undo button? Slate, 15 May. Available at: www.slate.com/articles/life/inside_higher_ed/2015/05/boston_university_sociology_professor_tweets_about_white_men_should_professors.html (accessed 2 June 2017).

25.

Jaschik

(2015b) Saida Grundy, moving forward. In: Inside Higher Ed. Available at: www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/08/24/saida-grundy-discusses-controversy-over-her-comments-twitter-her-career-race-and (accessed 1 June 2017).

26.

Jones

O’Connor

Brelsford

, et al. (2012) Costs and difficulties of recruiting patients to provide e-health support: Pilot study in one primary care trust. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 12(25): 1–25.

27.

Loder

(2016) The BMJ editors respond. British Medical Journal 352: i641. Available at: www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.i641/rr-13.

28.

McMillan-Cottom T (2015) Who do you think you are? When marginality meets academic celebrity. Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology 7. DOI: 10.7264/N319T5T. Available at https://adanewmedia.org/2015/04/issue7-mcmillancottom/ (accessed 2 May 2018).

29.

McMillan-Cottom T (2018) The real threat to campuses isn’t PC culture, it’s racism. Available at: www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/opinion-cottom-campus-racism_us_5a8afb80e4b00bc49f471b41 (accessed 2 June 2018).

30.

Mahrt

Weller

Peters

(2014) Twitter in scholarly communication. In: Weller

, et al. (eds) Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang, pp.399–410.

31.

Marwick

Boyd

(2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133.

32.

Messias

Vikatos

Benevenuto

(2017) White, man, and highly followed: Gender and race inequalities in Twitter. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.08619 (accessed 22 November 2015).

33.

National Association of Social Workers (NASW) (2017) Technology in social work practice. Available at: www.socialworkers.org/includes/newIncludes/homepage/PRA-BRO-33617.TechStandards_FINAL_POSTING.pdf (accessed 15 November 2017).

34.

Obar

(2014) Canadian advocacy 2.0: An analysis if social media adoption and perceived affordances by advocacy groups looking to advance activism in Canada. Canadian Journal of Communication 39: 211–233.

35.

O’Connor

Jackson

Goldsmith

(2014) Can I get a retweet please? Health research recruitment and the Twittersphere. Journal of Advanced Nursing 70: 599–609.

36.

Paterson

(2016) Standards for Official Ucalgary Social Media Channels – Final. University of Calgary, University Relations. Available at: https://arts.ucalgary.ca/sites/arts.ucalgary.ca/files/social-media-standards-final.pdf (accessed 4 April 2018).

37.

Priem

Costello

(2010) How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 47: 1–4.

38.

Priem

Taraborelli

Groth

, et al. (2010) Altmetrics: A manifesto. Available at: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/ (accessed 28 June 2018).

39.

Pulman

(2009) Twitter as a tool for delivering improved quality of life for people with chronic conditions. Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness 1: 245–252.

40.

Reinhardt

et al. (2009) How people are using Twitter during conferences. In: Creativity and Innovation Competencies on the Web. Proceedings of the 5th EduMedia, 4–5 May 2009, Salzburg, Austria. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.148.1238&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 5 January 2018).

41.

Scoble

Patridge

(2016) Twitter for academics: A guide. Available at: https://onlineacademic.wordpress.com/social-media-for-academics/twitter-for-academics/m (accessed 1 June 2017).

42.

Sitter

Curnew

(2016). The application of social media in social work community practice. Social Work Education 35(3): 271–283.

43.

Thelwall

, et al. (2013) Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE 8(5): e64841.

44.

Turkle S (2017) Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Hachette UK.

45.

Turner

(2014) Creating #Teamturner: An autoethnography of connection with social work education. In: Westwood

(ed.) Social Media in Social Work Education. Northwich: Critical Publishing, pp.63–73.

46.

Turner

Bennison

Megele

and Fenge LA (2016) Social work and social media: best friends or natural enemies? Social Work Education 35(3): 241–244.

47.

Veletsianos

(2013) Open practices and identity: Evidence from researchers and educators’ social media participation. British Journal of Educational Technology 44: 639–651.

48.

Weller

Bruns

Burgess

, et al. (2014) Twitter and society: An introduction. In: Weller

Bruns

Burgess

, et al. (eds) Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang, pp.xxix–xxxviii.

49.

Wesch

(2008) Context collapse. Available at: http://mediatedcultures.net/youtube/context-collapse/ (accessed 6 May 2017).

50.

Westwood

(2014) Social Media in Social Work Education. Northwich: Critical Publishing.

51.

Wilkerson

Iantaffi

Grey

, et al. (2014) Recommendations for internet-based qualitative health research with hard-to-reach populations. Qualitative Health Research 24(4): 561–574.