Abstract
This paper presents my reflections on the use of critical oral history method for a participatory, community-based international LGBT human rights research project. Although critical oral history method has been promoted as an empowering research method particularly suited to advocacy work, I describe emerging dilemmas around naming the work, assuming risks and understanding the method as a medium with potential for reifying existing power imbalances. I advocate for more complicated understandings of how critical research is not defined by the method, but instead, by the processes surrounding it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
