This article discusses the advantages of arts-based research specifically for high-context, culturally diverse, power-infused, and chaotic or diffuse research settings as often found in international aid. It points to the ability of arts to concretize abstract concepts and to situate them within specific socio-cultural locations, enabling powerless groups to self-define and to adjust resilience-enhancing interventions to their own perceptions. The arts-based method as an indirect form of communication is shown to be effective in changing stands of power holders and experts, enabling a dialogue that creates culturally sustainable aid. The model used in this article is demonstrated and discussed.
AmadeoG. (1997) ‘Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure’, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology28(2): 235–60.
2.
Argenti-PillenA. (2003) Masking Terror: How Women Contain Violence in Southern Sri Lanka. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
3.
Ben-EzerG. (2002) ‘The Collective Creative Space as a Tool with Inter-Cultural Work: Group Work with Ethiopian Immigrants’, in KacenL.Lev-WieselR. (eds) Group Work in a Multicultural Society, pp. 149–63. Tel Aviv, Israel: Cherikover Publications (in Hebrew).
4.
BetinskyM. (1995) What Do You See? Phenomenology of Therapeutic Art Experience. London: Jessica Kingsley.
5.
BhabhaH.K. (1994) The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
6.
BhattM.R. (2011) ‘Making the Voices of Victims Heard’, in KaufmanR.EdwardsD.MirskyJ. (eds) Crisis as an Opportunity: Organizational and Professional Responses to Disasters, pp. 112–9. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
7.
BowlerM. (1997) ‘Problems with Interviewing: Experiences with Service Providers and Clients’, in MillerG.DingwallR. (eds) Context and Method in Qualitative Research, pp. 66–77. London: Basic Books.
8.
ButlerM.L. (2001) ‘Making Waves’, Women’s Studies International Forum4(3): 387–99.
9.
CancelliniN. (1996) Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
ChaseR.DoneyA.SivayoganS.AriyaratneV.SatkunanayagamP.SwaminathanA. (1999) ‘III: Batticaloa Butterfly Garden Project: Mental Health Initiatives as Peace Initiatives in Sri Lankan School Children Affected by Armed Conflict’, Medicine, Conflict and Survival15(4): 379–90.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2000) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
DokterD. (1998) Art Therapists, Refugees and Migrants: Reaching across Borders. London: Jessica Kingsley.
15.
DominelliL. (2010) ‘Globalization, Contemporary Challenges and Social Work Practice’, International Social Work53(5): 599–612.
16.
EdmonsonL. (2005) ‘Marketing Trauma and the Theatre of War in Northern Uganda’, Theatre Journal57(3): 451–74.
17.
EisnerE. (1997) ‘The Promises and Perils of Alternative Forms of Data Representation’, Educational Researcher26(6): 4–20.
18.
EmersonM.SmithP. (2000) Researching the Visual: Images, Objects, Contexts, and Interactions in Social Research. London: SAGE.
19.
FosterV. (2007) ‘Ways of Knowing and Showing: Imagination and Representation in Feminist Participatory Social Research’, Journal of Social Work Practice21(3): 361–76.
20.
FrankelV. (1985) Man’s Search for Meaning. New York: Washington Square Press.
21.
FreireP.MacedoD. (1987) Literacy: Reading the Word and the World. London: Routledge.
22.
GardnerH. (1993) Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York: Basic Books.
23.
GowK.PatonD. (eds) (2009) Resilience: The Phoenix of Natural Disasters. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
24.
GubaE.G.LincolnY.S. (1985) ‘But Is It Rigorous? Trustworthiness and Authenticity in Naturalistic Evaluation’, in WilliamsD. (ed.) Naturalistic Evaluation, New Directions for Evaluation, pp. 73–84. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
HansenF. (2001) Living the Connection: Spirituality and Art Therapy. London: Jessica Kingsley.
26.
HarringtonA. (2004) Art and Social Theory: Sociological Arguments in Aesthetics. London: Polity Press Ltd.
27.
Hass-CohenN. (2003) ‘Art Therapy Mind Body Approaches’, Progress: Family Systems Research and Therapy12: 24–38.
28.
Hass-CohenN.CarrR. (2008) Art Therapy and Clinical Neuro-Science. London: Jessica Kingsley.
29.
HealyL.M. (2008) International Social Work: Professional Action in an Interdependent World, 2nd edn.New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
HiscoxA.CalischC. (1998) Tapestry of Cultural Issues in Art Therapy. London: Jessica Kingsley.
31.
HoganS. (1997) Feminist Approaches to Art Therapy. London; New York: Routledge.
32.
HubermanM.MilesM. (2002) ‘Reflections and Advice’, in HubermanM.MilesM. (eds) The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion, pp. 393–9. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
HussE. (2009) ‘A Case Study of Bedouin Women’s Art in Social Work: A Model of Social Arts Intervention with “Traditional” Women Negotiating Western Cultures’, Social Work Education28(6): 598–616.
34.
HussE. (2012) What We See and What We Say: Using Images in Research, Therapy, Empowerment, and Social Change. London: Routledge.
35.
HussE.SaridO. (2011) ‘Using Imagery in Health Care Settings: Addressing Physical and Psychological Trauma’, in MalchiodiC.A. (ed.) Art Therapy and Healthcare, pp. 74–85. New York: Guilford Publications.
36.
HussE.KaufmanR.AvgarA. (in press) ‘Arts as a Vehicle for Community Building and Post-Disaster Development’, Disasters.
JoughinJ.MaplesS. (2004) The New Aestheticism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
39.
KnowlesJ.G.ColeA.L. (eds) (2008) Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues. London: Routledge.
40.
LahadM. (2008) ‘Post-Traumatic Responses in Disasters: A Community Perspective’, in GowK.PatonD. (eds) Resilience: The Phoenix of Natural Disasters, pp. 33–46. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
41.
LaiH.ThrelfallJ. (2012) ‘Qiang embroidery in the Chinese earthquake’, Poster Presented at the Joint World Conference on Social Work and Social Development, Action, and Impact, Stockholm, July.
42.
LandryD.MacLeanG.SpivakG.C. (1996) ‘Subaltern Talk: Interview with Editors (1993–94)’, in LandryD.MacleanG. (eds) The Spivak Reader, pp. 287–308. New York: Routledge.
43.
LevineE.LevineS. (2011) Art in Action. London: Jessica Kingsley.
44.
LippardL. (1990) Mixed Blessings: Art in a Multicultural America. New York: Pantheon Books.
45.
MahonM. (2000) ‘The Visible Evidence of Cultural Producers’, Annual Review of Anthropology29: 467–92.
46.
MahoneyJ.ChandraV.GambheeraH.SilvaT.AranT. (2006) ‘Responding to the Mental Health and Psychosocial Needs of the People of Sri Lanka in Disasters’. International Review of Psychiatry18(6): 593–7.
47.
MasonJ. (2002) Qualitative Use of Visual Method. London: SAGE.
48.
MukherjeeD.ChowdhuryD. (2014) ‘What Do the Flyers Say? Embedded “Orientalist” Constructions in Social Work Study Abroad Programs in the United States’, International Social Work57(6): 576–89.
49.
PinkS.KurtiL. (2004) Working Images: Visual Research and Representation in Ethnography. London: Routledge.
50.
PiquamelN. (2005) ‘Hear the Silenced Voices and Make the Relationship: Issues in Relational Ethics and Empowerment in Aboriginal Contexts’, in ChampagneD.Abu-SaadI. (eds) Indigenous and Minority Education: International Perspectives on Empowerment, pp. 113–25. Beer Sheva, Israel: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
51.
RoseG. (1988) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: SAGE.
SclaterD. (2003) ‘The Arts and Narrative Research’, Qualitative Inquiry9(4): 621–5.
54.
ShankM. (2005) ‘Redefining the Movement: Art Activism’, Seattle Journal for Social Justice3: 531–5.
55.
SilverR. (2001) Art as Language: Access to Thoughts and Emotions through Stimulus Drawings. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
56.
SimonsH.HicksJ. (2006) ‘Opening Doors Using the Creative Arts in Learning and Teaching’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education5(1): 77–90.
57.
SmithD. (2002) ‘Institutional Ethnography’, in MayT. (ed.) Qualitative Research in Action, pp. 17–53. London: SAGE.
58.
SvistovaJ.PylesL. (2012) ‘US Policy Discourse of Relief Workers in Post- Earthquake Haiti: Implications for Participatory and Sustainable Recovery’, Paper Presented at Joint World Conference on Social Work and Social Development, Action, and Impact, Stockholm, July.
