This exploratory study aims to develop an understanding of caseworker views on the challenges and opportunities of kinship care. This sample includes protection and kinship service caseworkers who service families in Ontario. Focus groups with a self-selected sample of 27 caseworkers explored the current attitudes of ongoing caseworkers toward kinship caregivers and the policies that mandate their exploration. Results indicated that workers are embracing the idea of kinship care; however they note several limitations and frustrations with the practice. Lack of resources and services for kinship caregivers, issues of conflict and difficulty in monitoring kinship homes hinder positive attitudes about this practice. Further, workers felt that the current legislation encourages the approval of kinship homes that are viewed as substandard and unsafe for children.
AlbertVIaciRCatlinSN (2006) Facing time limits and kinship placements. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services. 85: 63–71.
2.
AldgateJMcIntoshM (2006) Looking after the Family: A Study of Children Looked After in Kinship Care in Scotland. Social Work Inspection Agency.
3.
ArgentH (2009) What’s the problem with kinship care?Adoption & Fostering. 33: 6–14.
4.
BogdanRCBilkenSK (1998) Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. 3rd edn. Neeham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BroadB (2002) Reclaiming our Children: Kinship Care for Children in Need. IASSW Montpelier Conference Paper.
6.
ChamberlainPReidJMLandsverkJFisherPAStoolminerM (2006) Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care?Child Abuse & Neglect. 30(4): 404–424.
7.
CoakleyTMGaryCBuehlerCCoxME (2007) Kinship foster parents’ perceptions of factors that promote or inhibit successful fostering. Children and Youth Services Review. 29: 92–109.
8.
ColemanDClarkS (2003) Preparing for child welfare practice: Themes, a cognitive-affective model, and implications from a qualitative study. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 7(1–2): 83–96.
9.
CuddebackG (2004) Kinship and family foster care: A methodological substantive synthesis of research. Children and Youth Services Review. 26: 623–639.
10.
del ValleJFLopezMMontserratCBravoA (2009) Twenty years of foster care: Profiles, patterns and outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review. 31: 847–853.
11.
DillK (2010) Fitting a square peg into a round hole: Understanding kinship care outside of the foster care paradigm (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto.
12.
GeenR (2003) Kinship Care: Making the Most of a Valuable Resource. Washington: The Urban Institute Press.
13.
GergenKJ (1999) An Invitation to Social Construction. London: SAGE Publications.
14.
Government of Ontario. (2000). The Child & Family Services Act Bill 210. Ontario: Queen’s Printer of Ontario.
15.
GranvoldDK(2010) Cognitive-behavioural therapy with adults. In: BrandellJR (ed.) Theory and Practice in Clinical Social Work. New York: SAGE Publications, pp. 179–212.
16.
GraySNybellL (1990) Issues in African-American family preservation. Child Welfare. 69(6): 513–523.
17.
HarrisMSHackettW (2008) Decision points in child welfare: An action research model to address disproportionality. Children and Youth Services Review. 30: 199–215.
18.
HasenfeldY (1983) Human Service Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
IglehartA (1994) Kinship foster care: Placement service and outcome issues. Children and Youth Services Review. 16: 107–122.
20.
KohE (2010) Permanency outcomes of children in kinship and non-kinship foster care: Testing the external validity of kinship effects. Children and Youth Services Review. 32: 289–398.
21.
LinhorstDM (2002) A review of the use and potential of focus groups in social work research. Qualitative Social Work. 1(1): 208–228.
22.
MorazesJLBentonADClarkSJJacquetSE (2010) Views of specially-trained child welfare social workers: A qualitative study of their motivations, perceptions and retention. Qualitative Social Work. 9: 227–247.
23.
MorganDL (1996) Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology. 22: 129–152.
24.
PadgettDK (2004) The Qualitative Research Experience. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
25.
PetersJ (2005) True ambivalence: Child welfare workers’ thoughts, feelings and beliefs about kinship foster care. Children and Youth Services Review. 27: 595–614.
26.
PotterJ (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: SAGE Publications.
27.
RyanJPGarnierPZyphurMZhaiF (2006) Investigating the effects of caseworker characteristics in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review. 28: 993–1006.
28.
StraussACorbinJ (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
29.
WinokurMACrawfordGALongobardiRCValentineDP (2008) Matched comparison of children in kinship care and foster care on child welfare outcomes. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services. 89: 338–346.
30.
ZellM (2006) Child welfare workers: Who they are and how they view the child welfare system. Child Welfare. 85(1): 83–103.
