During a pilot study that used interviews to collect data from young male apprentices about construction site safety, we were confronted with limited verbal responses. This article is about how we explored this research problem of ameliorating unresponsive interview interactions. The article reviews the options that previous researchers have trialled and developed, and specifically focuses on artefact-mediated interviews conducted with young male participants. We focus on the use of images within artefact-mediated interviews to draw out data from less communicative subjects. Our reflection upon this process proposes that the use of both abstract and concrete images within an artefact-mediated interview can produce diverse and enriched forms of data.
AnningA (2000) The Influence of the Socio-cultural Context on Young Children's Meaning Making through Mark Making/Drawing, Modelling and Playing with Objects. Working Paper 22, Centre for Research on Family, Kinship & Childhood, University of Leeds.
2.
BeloffH (1984) A social psychologist in the camera culture. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 37: 287–296.
3.
BrayL (2007) Developing an activity to aid informed assent when interviewing children and young people. Journal of Research in Nursing, 12: 447–457.
4.
Carawan LN and Nalavany B (2010) Using photography and art in concept mapping research with adults with dyslexia, Disability & Society, 25(3): 317–329.
5.
Cartwright S and Holmes N (2006) The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism, Human Resource Management Review 16(2): 199–208.
6.
DenzinNKLincolnYS (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
DillenburgerC (1992/93) Communicating with children: The use of art in social work. Practice, 6(1): 447–457.
8.
EvansPFullerM (1996) ‘Hello. Who am I speaking to?’ Communicating with pre-school children in educational research settings. Early Years, 17(1): 17–20.
9.
ExnerJE (1986) The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
10.
FosterV (2007) The art of empathy: Employing the arts in social inquiry with poor, working class women. Social Justice, 34(1): 12–27.
11.
GermainR (2004) An exploratory study using cameras and Talking Mats to access the views of young people with learning disabilities on their out-of-school activities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(4): 170–174.
12.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
13.
GolishTDCaughlinJP (2002) I'd rather not talk about it: Adolescents' and young adults' use of topic avoidance in stepfamilies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(1): 78–106.
14.
HammerE (1980) The Clinical Application of Projective Drawings, Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
15.
HeisleyDDLevySJ (1991) Autodriving: A photoelicitation technique. Journal of Consumer Research, 18: 257–272.
16.
HibbardRAHartmanG (1990) Emotional indicators in human figure drawings of sexually victimised and non-abused children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(2): 211–219.
17.
KaplanIHowesA (2004) Seeing through different eyes: Exploring the value of participative research using images in schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(2): 143–155.
18.
KellyGA (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs, New York: Norton.
19.
KoseG (1985) Children's knowledge of photography: A study of the developing awareness of a representational medium. British Journal of Development of Psychology, 3: 373–384.
20.
LewisMLOsofskyJDMooreMS(1997) Violent cities, violent streets: Children draw their neighbourhoods. In: OsofskyJD (ed.) Children in a Violent Society, New York: The Guildford Press, pp. 277–299.
21.
LoefflerTA (2005) Looking deeply in: Using photoelicitation to explore the meanings of outdoor education experiences. The Journal of Experiential Education, 27(3): 343–346.
22.
McAuleyC (1996) Children in Long Term Foster Care: Emotional and Social Development, Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
23.
Meebelo NM-N (2007) Exploration and Harnessing of Local Knowledge in Grassroots Participatory Research: A Case of Women in the Zambian Mining Community. PhD Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia.
24.
MerriamSB (1998) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
25.
MonaghanLGoodmanJE (2007) A Cultural Approach to Interpersonal Communication, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. xxii–482.
26.
MooreMS(1994) Common characteristics in the drawings of ritually abused children and adults. In: SinasonV (ed.) Treating Survivors of Satanist Abuse, New York: Routledge.
27.
OwenHDicksonDMallettJStringerM (2008) Communicating social identity: A study of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland. Communication Research, 35(6): 792–822.
PineDSMoggKBradleyBPMontgomeryLMonkCMcClureESchwederEErnstMCharneyDKaufmanJ (2005) Attention bias to threat in maltreated children: Implications for vulnerability to stress-related psychopathology. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(2): 291–296.
ScheerJWCatinaA (1996) Empirical Constructivism in Europe – The Personal Construct Approach. Giessen: Psychosozial Verlag, 13–17.
32.
ShaniEAyalonAHammadIASikronF (2003) What picture is worth a thousand words? A comparative evaluation of a burn prevention programme by type of medium in Israel. Health Promotion International, 18(4): 361–371.
33.
SimpsonRLewisPMJ (2007) Voice, Visibility and the Gendering of Organizations. Management, Work and Organisations, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
34.
StanczakGC (2007) Visual Research Methods: Image, Society, and Representation, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
35.
StockSDaviesDKWehmeyerML (2004) Internet-based multimedia tests and surveys for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4): 43–47.
36.
StraussACorbinJ (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
37.
SztoPFurmanRLangerC (2005) Poetry and photography: An exploration into expressive/creative qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 4(2): 135–156.
