Social workers in health care often argue that they must be professionally assertive in order to keep their values afloat in a stormy sea of change. The practice of health social work has traditionally been tied to a professional identity derived from a claim to expertise in the ‘psychosocial’ aspects of health and illness. This article briefly reviews relevant literature on health social work in institutional settings, with specific reference to the links between knowledge, credentials and a secure professional identity. Data from a small study is used to examine the problematic nature of professional identity and links between continuing professional education and status in health social work in New Zealand. Findings reveal practitioner concern that the knowledge claim of social work is weak and this impacts on their professional identity and status in multidisciplinary institutional settings.
AdamsKHeanSSturgisPClarkJM (2006) Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first-year health and social care students. Learning in Health & Social Care5(2): 55–68.
2.
AlaszewskiACoxonK (2009) Uncertainty in everyday life: Risk, worry and trust. Health, Risk & Society11(3): 201–207.
3.
AuslanderG (2001) Social work in health care: What have we achieved?Journal of Social Work1(2): 201–222.
4.
Beddoe L (2010) Building Professional Capital: New Zealand Social Workers and Continuing Education. Unpublished PhD thesis, Deakin University, Victoria.
5.
BeddoeL (2011) Investing in the future: Social workers talk about research. British Journal of Social Work41(3): 557–575.
6.
BeddoeLHaringtonP (2011) One step in a thousand-mile journey: Can civic practice be nurtured in practitioner research? Reporting on an innovative project. British Journal of Social Work.. First published April 5, 2011. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr035.
7.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste, (trans. Nice R). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8.
BourdieuP(1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJG (eds) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, (trans. Nice R). New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.
9.
BrachtN(1978) Scope of social work and its contribution to health care. In: BrachtN (eds) Social Work in Health Care: A Guide to Professional Practice, New York: Haworth Press, pp. 3–33.
10.
BywatersP (1986) Social work and the medical profession: Arguments against unconditional collaboration. British Journal of Social Work16(6): 661–667.
11.
BywatersPMcLeodENapierL (2009) Social Work and Global Health Inequalities, Bristol: Policy Press.
12.
Castells M (1997) The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
13.
Cabot RC (1919) Social Work: Essays on the Meeting-ground of Doctor and Social Worker. Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
14.
CoburnD (2006) Medical dominance then and now. Health Sociological Review15(5): 432–443.
15.
DriskoJW (1997) Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to promote academic integrity. Journal of Social Work Education33(1): 185–197.
16.
EvettsJ (2006) Introduction: Trust and professionalism: Challenges and occupational changes. Current Sociology54(4): 515–531.
17.
FawcettB (2009) Vulnerability: Questioning the certainties in social work and health. International Social Work52(4): 473–484.
18.
Gadamer H-G (1989) Truth and Method (trans. Weisenheimer J and Marshall DG, 2nd rev. edn). New York: Crossroad.
19.
GreenwoodE (1957) Attributes of a profession. Social Work2(3): 45–55.
20.
Hansen JJ (1995) Learning From the Rhetoric of the Moment: A Study of Rural and Remote Uses of Telecommunications. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
21.
HealyK (2009) A case of mistaken identity: The social welfare professions and new public management. Journal of Sociology45(4): 401–418.
22.
JarvisP (1996) Continuing education in a post-modern or global society: Towards a theoretical framework of comparative analysis. Comparative Education32(2): 233–244.
23.
KincheloeJLMcLarenPL(2000) Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 279–313.
24.
McMichaelA (2000) Professional identity and continuing education: A study of social workers in hospital settings. Social Work Education19(2): 175–184.
25.
MillerJ (2006) Skills, bravery, courage, and foolhardiness: Seventy-five years of social work in health care in Melbourne, Australia. Social Work in Health Care43(2–3): 173–191.
26.
OlgiatiV (2006) Shifting heuristics in the sociological approach to professional trustworthiness: The sociology of science. Current Sociology54(4): 533–547.
27.
O’NeillO (2002) A Question of Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
PayneM (2006) Identity politics in multiprofessional teams: Palliative care social work. Journal of Social Work6(2): 137–150.
29.
RiachK (2009) Exploring participant-centred reflexivity in the research interview. Sociology43(2): 356–370.
30.
Roach AnleuSL (1992) The professionalisation of social work? A case study of three organisational settings. Sociology26(1): 23–43.
31.
TaylorHBeckettCMcKeigueB (2008) Judgments of Solomon: Anxieties and defences of social workers involved in care proceedings. Child & Family Social Work13(1): 23–31.
32.
ToddAJ (1919) The Scientific Spirit and Social Work, New York: Macmillan.
33.
TurnerJC(1999) Some current issues in research on social identity and self categorization theories. In: EllemersNSpearsRDoosjeB (eds) Social Identity, Context, Commitment, Content, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 6–34.
34.
Willis E (1983) Medical Dominance. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
35.
WillisE (2006) Introduction: Taking stock of medical dominance. Health Sociology Review15(5): 421–431.
36.
WitzA (1992) Professions and Patriarchy, London, New York: Routledge.
