This article examines how the social and cultural context influence the way in which field research methods are utilized. Research methods need to be modified to meet the sensibilities and sensitivities of particular social groups and settings. Through a reflexive analysis of a research study on the lives of visually impaired young people and adults in Bahrain, this article discusses how gender, religion and culture need to be taken account of. It also discusses how the research process needed to take account of the participants’ disabilities. It examines the issues of research access, informed consent, researcher’s dress, confidentiality, research location, and time. It highlights how the gender of the researcher was constraining in some gender segregated educational settings in a Muslim society. The article engages with the researcher’s positionality through reflexive discussion.
Ahmed, D. (2007) ‘Gender, Disability and Islam: Living with Visual Impairment in Bahrain’, School of Health and Social Studies. Coventry: University of Warwick 364.
2.
Al-Abduly, A. (2008) ‘The Identity of Bahrain is Facing a Serious Dilemma’, AL-Waqt 1–2.
3.
Al-KrenawiAGrahamJR (2000) Culturally Sensitive Social Work Practice with Arab Clients in Mental Health Settings, Health and Social Work25: 9–9.
4.
Al-MakhamrehSSLewando-HundtG (2008) Researching “at Home” as an Insider/Outsider: Gender and Culture in an Ethnographic Study of Social Work Practice in an Arab Society, Qualitative Social Work7(1): 9–23.
5.
AllenCMilnerJPriceD (2002) Home is Where the Start Is: The Housing and Urban Experiences of Visually Impaired Children. Bristol: Policy Press for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
6.
AndersonKJackD(1991) Learning to Listen: Interview Technique and Analyses In: GluckSPataiD (eds). Women’s Words: Feminist Practice of Oral History. London: Routledge. 11–26.
7.
BaznaMSHatabTA (2005) Disability in the Qur’an: The Islamic Alternative to Defining, Viewing, and Relating to Disability, Journal of Religion, Disability & Health9(1): 5–27.
8.
BeckerlegSLewando HundtG(2004) Reflections on Fieldwork Among Kenyan Heroin Users In: LynneHJaneM (eds). Anthropologists in the Field: Cases in Participant Observation. New York: Columbia University Press. 127–39.
9.
BeresfordB (1997) Personal Accounts: Involving Disabled Children in Research. Norwich: SPRU.
10.
BlaxterLHughesCTightM (2006) How to Research. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
11.
BurgessRG (1982) Field Research: A Sourcebook and Field Manual. London: Allen & Unwin.
12.
Cannon, S. (1989) ‘Social Research in Stressful Settings: Difficulties for the Sociologist Studying the Treatment of Breast Cancer’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 11: 62–77.
13.
Central Statistics Organisation (2001) ‘Basic Result Population, Housing, Building & Establishment Census’, in Central Statistics Organisation (ed.) Ministry of Cabinet Affairs, Bahrain, 170.
14.
CostleyD(2000) Collecting the Views of Young People with Moderate Learning Difficulties In: LewisALindsayG (eds). Researching Children’s Perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press. 163–172.
15.
CotterillP (1992) Interviewing Women: Issues of Friendship, Vulnerability and Power, Women Studies International Forum15(5–6): 593–606.
D’CruzHJonesM (2004) Social Work Research: Ethical and Political Contexts. London: SAGE.
18.
DahlgrenS(2005) Law: Modern Family Law, 1800–Present: Gulf, Saudi Arabia and Yemen In: JoephSNajmabadiAPeteetJShamiSSiapnoJSmithJI (eds). Encyclopedia of Women and Islamic Cultures. Leiden-Boston: Brill. 265–467.
FilsteadWJ (1970) Qualitative Methodology: Firsthand Involvement with the Social World. Chicago: Markham Pub.
21.
FinchJ(1984) “It is Great to Have Someone to Talk To”: The Ethics and Politics of Interviewing Women In: ColinBHelenR (eds). Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 70–8.
GibsonPAbramsL (2003) Racial Difference in Engaging, Recruiting, and Interviewing African American Women in Qualitative Research, Qualitative Social Work2(4): 457–76.
24.
GilgunJFAbramsLS (2002) The Nature and Usefulness of Qualitative Social Work Research: Some Thoughts and an Invitation to Dialogue, Qualitative Social Work1(1): 39–55.
25.
Gill, F. and Maclean, C. (2002) ‘Knowing your Place: Gender and Reflexivity in two Ethnographies’, Sociological Research Online 12(2), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/2/gill.html (consulted February 2007).
26.
GillhamB (2000) Case Study Research Methods. London: Continuum.
27.
GordonEJ (2000) When Oral Consent Will Do, Field Methods12(3): 235–8.
28.
GrahamH(1984) Surveying through stories In: BellCRobertsH (eds). Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 104–24.
29.
GreenJThorogoodN (2004) Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: SAGE.
30.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (2002) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London/New York: Routledge.
31.
HudsonL(2005) Network: The Ottoman Empire Kinship In: JoephSNajmabadiAPeteetJShamiSSiapnoJSmithJI (eds). Encyclopedia of Women and Islamic Cultures. Leiden-Boston: Brill. 529–31.
32.
IrvingA(2005) Life made Strange: An Essay on the Re-inhabitation of Bodies and Landscapes In: WendyJDavidM (eds). The Qualities of Time: Anthropological Approaches. Oxford: Berg. 317–29.
33.
JarviluomaHMoisalaPVilkkoA (2003) Gender and Qualitative Methods. London: SAGE.
34.
KingDE(2005) Kinship and State: Arab States In: JoephSNajmabadiAPeteetJShamiSSiapnoJSmithJI (eds). Encyclopedia of Women and Islamic Cultures. Leiden-Boston: Brill. 347–9.
35.
KosyginaLV (2005) Doing Gender in Research: Reflection on Experience in Field, The Qualitative Report10(1): 87–95.
36.
KruegerR (1994) Focus groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. London: SAGE.
37.
LabareeRV (2002) The Risk of “Going Observationalist”: Negotiating the Hidden Dilemmas of Being an Insider Participant Observer, Qualitative Research2(1): 97–122.
38.
LeeD (1997) Interviewing Men: Vulnerabilities and Dilemmas, Women’s Studies International Forum20(4): 553–64.
39.
Lewando-HundtG(1984) The Exercise of Power by Bedouin Women In: EmanuelMAvshalomS (eds). The Changing Bedouin. New Jersey: Transaction Inc. 83–124.
40.
MaccobyEE (1990) Gender and Relationships: A Development Account, American Psychologist45(4): 513–20.
41.
MckeeLO’BrienM(1983) Interviewing Men: Taking Gender Seriously In: GamarnokowEMorganDTaylorsonJPD (eds). The Public and the Private. London: Heinemann. 147–61.
OakleyA(1981) Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms In: HelenR (ed.) Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 30–61.
45.
PadfieldMProctorI (1996) The Effect of Interviewer's Gender on the Interviewing Process: A Comparative Enquiry, Sociology30: 355–66.
46.
PiniB (2005) Interviewing Men: Gender and the Collection and Interpretation of Qualitative Data, Journal of Sociology41(2): 201–16.
47.
PopeCMaysN (1999) Qualitative Research in Health Care. London: BMJ Books.
48.
PortelliA (1997) The Battle of Valle Giulia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue. New York: University of Wisconsin Press.
49.
RafothBMacauleyBStoltenbergKHousenickSBrownJBaranB (1999) Sex in the Centre: Gender Differences in Tutorial Interactions, The Writing Lab Newsletter24(3): 1–5.
50.
RibbensJ (1989) Interviewing – An “Unnatural Situation”?, Women’s Studies International Forum12(6): 579–92.
51.
RiessmanC(1994) Narrative Approaches to Trauma In: RiessmanCK (ed.) Qualitative Studies in Social Work Research. London: SAGE. 579–592.
52.
Rispler-ChaimV (2007) Disability in Islamic law. Dordrecht: Springer.
SchillmeierM (2008) Time-Spaces of In/dependence and Dis/ability, Time and Society17(2–3): 215–31.
55.
SeifH(2005) Human Rights: Arab Gulf and Yemen In: JoephSNajmabadiAPeteetJShamiSSiapnoJSmithJI (eds). Encyclopedia of Women and Islamic Culture. Leiden-Boston: Brill. 269–70.
56.
SeikalyM(1997) Bahraini Women in Formal and Informal Groups: The Politics of Identification In: ChattyDRaboA (eds). Organizing Women: Formal and Informal Women’s Groups in the Middle East. Oxford/New York: Berg. 125–46.
57.
SeikalyM(1998) Women and Religion in Bahrain: An Emerging Identity In: YvonneYHEspositoJ (eds). Islam, Gender, & Social Change. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. 169–89.
58.
ShawIGouldN (2001) Qualitative Research in Social Work. London: SAGE.
59.
ShirawiMA-A (1989) Education in Bahrain: Problems and Progress. Oxford: Ithaca.
60.
TurmusaniM (2003) Disabled People and Economic Needs in the Developing World: A Political Perspective from Jordan. Aldershot: Ashgate.
61.
ValentineGButlerRSkeltonT(2005) The Ethical and Methodological Complexities of Doing Research with “Vulnerable” Young People In: SheehyK (ed.) Ethics and Research in Inclusive Education: Values into Practice. London/New York: Routledge Falmer. 76–82.
62.
van HeugtenK (2004) Managing Insider Research: Learning from Experience, Qualitative Social Work3(2): 203–19.
63.
VerdurmeAViaeneJ (2003) Exploring and Modelling Consumer Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Food, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal6(2): 95–110.
