This is a call for the international community of qualitative researchers to address
the implications of the attempt by federal governments to regulate scientific
inquiry by defining what is good science. Around the globe governments are
attempting to enforce biomedical, evidence-based models of evidence. These efforts
must be resisted by critical, qualitative scholars.
Atkinson, Elizabeth
(2004)
‘Thinking Outside the Box: An Exercise in Heresy’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(1):
111–129
.
2.
Bloch, Marianne
(2004)
‘A Discourse That Disciplines, Governs, and Regulates: On
Scientific Research in Education’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(1):
96–110
.
3.
Campbell, Donald
and
Stanley, Julian
(1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design.
Chicago, IL: Rand McNally
.
4.
Cannella, Gaile S.
(2004)
‘Regulatory Power: Can a Feminist Poststructuralist Engage in
Research Oversight?’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(2):
235–245
.
5.
Cannella, Gaile S.
and
Lincoln, Yvonna S.
(2004a)
‘Dangerous Discourses II: Comprehending and Countering the
Redeployment of Discourses (and Resources) in the Generation of Liberatory Inquiry’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(2):
165–174
.
6.
Cannella, Gaile S.
and
Lincoln, Yvonna S.
(2004b)
‘Epilogue: Claiming a Critical Public Social
Science-Reconceptualizing and Redeploying Research’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(2):
298–309
.
7.
Feuer, M. J.
,
Towne, L.
and
Shavelson, R. J.
(2002)
‘Scientific Culture and Educational Research’
, Educational Researcher31(8):
4–14
.
8.
Howe, Kenneth R.
(2004)
‘A Critique of Experimentalism’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(1):
42–61
.
9.
Lather, Patti
(2004)
‘This Is Your Father's Paradigm: Government Intrusion
and the Case of Qualitative Research in Education’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(1):
15–34
.
10.
Lincoln, Yvonna S.
and
Cannella, Gaile S.
(2004a)
‘Dangerous Discourses Methodological Conservatism and
Governmental Regimes of Truth’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(1):
5–14
.
11.
Lincoln, Yvonna S.
and
Cannella, Gaile S.
(2004b)
‘Qualitative Research, Power, and the Radical Right’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(2):
175–201
.
12.
Lincoln, Yvonna S.
and
Tierney, William G.
(2004)
‘Qualitative Research and Institutional Review Boards’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(2):
219–234
.
13.
Maxwell, Joseph A.
(2004)
‘Reemergent Scientism, Postmodernism, and Dialogue Across Differences’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(1):
35–41
.
14.
Mutua, Kagendoo
and
Swadener, Beth Blue
(2004) ‘Introduction’, in
Kagendo Mutua
and
Beth Blue Swadener
(eds) Decolonizing Research in Cross-Cultural Contexts: Critical
Personal Narratives, pp. 1–23.
Albany, NY: SUNY Press
.
15.
Popkewitz, Thomas S.
(2004)
‘Is the National Research Council Committee's Report on
Scientific Research in Education Scientific?: On Trusting the Manifesto’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(1):
62–78
.
16.
Ryan, Katherine E.
and
Hood, Lisa K.
(2004)
‘Guarding the Castle and Opening the Gates’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(1):
79–95
.
17.
Schwandt, Thomas
(2000) ‘Three Epistemological Stances for
Qualitative Inquiry’, in
N. K. Denzin
and
Y. S. Lincoln
(eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, pp.
189–213.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
18.
Seale, Clive
,
Gobo, Giampietro
,
Gubrium, Jaber F.
and
Silverman, David
(2004) ‘ Introduction: Inside Qualitative
Research’, in
Clive Seale
,
Giampietro Gobo
,
Jaber F. Gubrium
and
David Silverman
(eds) Qualitative Research Practice, pp.
1–11.
London: Sage
.
19.
St Pierre, Elizabeth Adams
(2004)
‘Refusing Alternatives: a Science of Contestation’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(1):
130–139
.
20.
Teddlie, Charles
and
Tashakkori, Abbes
(2003) ‘Major Issues and Controversies in the
Use of Mixed Methods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences’,
in
Abbes Tashakkori
and
Charles Teddlie
(eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research,
pp. 3–50.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
21.
Weinstein, Matthew
(2004)
‘Randomized Design and the Myth of Certain Knowledge: Guinea Pig
Narratives and Cultural Critique’
, Qualitative Inquiry10(2):
246–260
.
