In this study, the antimicrobial efficacy of hand washing (HW) and hand washing plus rubbing with an alcohol-based solution (HWR) on numbers of total and transient flora colonies on the hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) during routine patient care was assessed. Samples were collected, using a standard bag broth technique, from the hands of 154 HCWs, before and immediately after carrying out a hand hygiene procedure. The numbers of total and transient flora colonies per plate were counted and transient pathogens were identified. A significant statistical difference between ward speciality was detected with respect to the isolation rate of transient flora. Transient hand flora were recovered from 25.3% of HCWs before carrying out the hand hygiene procedure. With respect to the disappearance and prevention of regrowth of transient flora after hand hygiene, the HWR technique was significantly more effective than HW. In conclusion, a disinfectant should be added to the hand washing process to achieve optimum protection against nosocomial infections in routine hospital practice.
LarsonE: Skin hygiene and infection prevention: More of the same or different approaches?. Clin Infect Dis1999; 29: 1281–1286.
2.
PittetD: Improving compliance with hand hygiene in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2000; 21: 381–386.
3.
NyströmB: Impact of handwashing on mortality in intensive care: Examination of the evidence. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol1994; 15: 435–436.
4.
ReybrouckG: Role of hands in the spread of nosocomial infections. J Hosp Infect1983; 4: 103–110.
5.
KampfGKramerA: Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clin Microbiol Rev2004; 17: 863–893.
6.
BischoffWEReynoldTMSeslerCN: Handwashing compliance by health care workers: The impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic. Arch Intern Med2000; 160: 1017–1021.
7.
PittetDHugonnetSHarbarthS: Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet2000; 356: 1307–1312.
8.
EckertDGEhrenkranzNJAlfonsoBC: Indications for alcohol or bland soap in removal of aerobic Gram-negative skin bacteria: Assessment by a novel method. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol1989; 10: 306–311.
9.
RotterML: Arguments for alcoholic hand disinfection. J Hosp Infect2001; 48 (suppl A): S4–S8.
10.
BoyceJMPittetD, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force: Guideline for hand hygiene in healthcare settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Association for Professionals in Infection Control/Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recomm Rep2002; 51 (RR-16): 1–45.
11.
LarsonE: Handwashing and skin. Physiologic and bacteriologic aspects. Infect Control1985; 6: 14–23.
12.
LarsonELStromMSEvansCA: Analysis of three variables in sampling solutions used to assay bacteria of hands: Type of solution, use of antiseptic neutralizers, and solution temperature. J Clin Microbiol1980; 12: 355–360.
13.
WinnefeldMRichardMADrancourtM: Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination procedures in everyday hospital use. Br J Dermatol2000; 143: 546–550.
14.
LarsonE: Hygiene of skin: When is clean too clean?. Emerg Infect Dis2001; 7: 225–230.
15.
PittetDDharanSTouveneauS: Bacterial contamination of the hands of hospital staff during routine patient care. Arch Intern Med1999; 159: 821–826.
16.
ThompsonBLDwyerDMUsseryXT: Handwashing and glove use in a long-term care facility. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol1997; 18: 97–103.
17.
SmithPWRusnakPG: Infection prevention and control in the long-term care facility. Am J Infect Control1997; 25: 488–512.
18.
WidmerAFDangelM: Alcohol-based handrub: Evaluation of technique and microbiological efficacy with international infection control professionals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2004; 25: 207–209.
19.
CardosoCLPereiraHHZequimJC: Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing Acinetobacter baumannii strain from contaminated hands. Am J Infect Control1999; 27: 327–331.
20.
GuilhermettiMHernandesSEFukushigueY: Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from contaminated hands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2001; 22: 105–108.
21.
ZaragozaMSallesMGomezJ: Handwashing with soap or alcoholic solutions? A randomized clinical trial of its effectiveness. Am J Infect Control1999; 27: 258–261.
22.
GirouELoyeauSLegrandP: Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: Randomised clinical trial. BMJ2002; 325: 362.
23.
KacGPodglajenIGueneretM: Microbiological evaluation of two hand hygiene procedures achieved by healthcare workers during routine patient care: A randomized study. J Hosp Infect2005; 60: 32–39.
24.
EhrenkranzNJAlfonsoBC: Failure of bland soap handwash to prevent hand transfer of patient bacteria to urethral catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol1991; 12: 654–662.
25.
TvedtCBukholmG: Alcohol-based hand disinfection: A more robust hand-hygiene method in an intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect2005; 59: 229–234.
26.
DharanSHugonnetSSaxH: Comparison of waterless hand antisepsis agents at short application times: Raising the flag of concern. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2003; 24: 160–164.
27.
Tentative final monograph for health care antiseptic products: Proposed rule. Fed Reg1994; 59: 31401–31452.
