An algorithm was developed in this study, using rule-based fuzzy logic, to enable masses that are hard to recognize or detect in mammograms to become more readily perceptible. Small lesions, such as microcalcifications and other masses that are hard to recognize, especially on film-scan mammograms, were processed through segmentation. A total of 40 mammograms were used and they were classified by radiologists into three groups: those with microcalcifications (n = 15), those with tumours (n = 15), and those with no lesions (n = 10). Five mammograms were taken as training data sets from each of the groups with microcalcifications and tumours. The algorithm was then applied to data not taken for training. The algorithm achieved a mean accuracy of 99% compared with the findings of the radiologists.
ShiZZhangDSWangHX: Feature extraction using generalized interpolating wavelets. IEEE Trans Image Process1999; Available at: www.uh.edu/∼zshi/publications/feu99.pdf (last accessed 3 October 2007).
2.
BazzaniABevilacquaABolliniD: Automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using an SVM classifier. In: Proceedings of the European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges, Belgium, 26–28 April 2000, D-Facto public, pp 195–200.
3.
te BrakeGMKarssemeijerNHendriksJHCL: An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol2000; 45: 2843–2857.
4.
MiniMGThomasT: A neural network method for mammogram analysis based on statistical features. IEEE Xplore2003; 4: 1489–1492.
5.
ChristoyianniIKoutrasADermatasE: Computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer in digitized mammograms. Comput Med Imaging Graph2002; 26: 309–319.
6.
PapadopoulosAFotiadisDILikasA: An automatic microcalcification detection system based on a hybrid neural network classifier. Artif Intell Med2002; 25: 149–167.
7.
ChanHPDoiKGalhotraS: Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 1. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Phys1987; 14: 538–548.
8.
DaviesDHDanceDR: Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol1990; 35: 1111–1118.
9.
QianWClarkeLPKallergiM: Tree-structured nonlinear filter and wavelet transform for microcalcification segmentation in mammography. SPIE Biomed Image Process Biomed Visual1993; 1905: 509–520.
10.
SoniTZeidlerJRKuWH: Performance evaluation of two-dimensional adaptive prediction filters for detection of small objects in image data. IEEE Trans Image Process1993; 2: 327–340.
11.
DenglerJBehrensSDesageJF: Segmentation of microcalcifications in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging1993; 12: 634–642.
12.
ZhaoD: Rule-based morphological feature extraction of microcalcifications in mammograms. SPIE Biomed Image Process Biomed Visual1993; 1905: 702–715.
13.
LefebvreFBenaliHGillesR: A fractal approach to the segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys1995; 22: 381–390.
14.
LiHLiuKJRLoSCB: Fractal modelling and segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging1997; 16: 785–798.
15.
BrzakovicDBrzakovicPNeskovicM: An approach to automated screening of mammograms. SPIE Biomed Image Process Biomed Visual1993; 1905: 690–701.
16.
BazzaniABolliniDBrancaccioR: System for automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Int J Mod Phys C2000; 11: 1–12.
17.
NetschTPeitgenHO: Scale-space signatures for the detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging1999; 18: 774–786.
18.
ChengHDChenJRFreimanisRI: A novel fuzzy logic approach to microcalcification detection. Inf Sci1998; 111: 189–205.
19.
BrzakovicDLuoXMBrzakovicP: An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging1990; 9: 233–241.
20.
KovalerchukBTriantaphyllouERuizJF: Fuzzy logic in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis: Analysis of lobulation. Artif Intell Med1997; 11: 75–85.
21.
GuliatoDRangayyanRMCarnielliWA: Segmentation of breast tumors in mammograms by fuzzy region growing. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Hong Kong, 29 October–1 November 1998.Piscataway: IEEE Inc., 1998; vol 20: pp 1002–1005.
22.
PandeyNSalcicZSivaswamyJ: Fuzzy logic based microcalcification detection. In: Neural Networks for Signal Processing X, 2000. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop, Sydney, Australia, 11–13 Dec 2000.Piscataway: IEEE Inc., 2000; vol 2: pp 662–671.
23.
ChengHDLuiYMFreimanisRI: A novel approach to microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging1998; 17: 442–450.
24.
CahoonTCSuttonMABezdekJC: Breast cancer detection using image processing techniques. In: Proceedings of FUZZ-IEEE 2000: 9th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Piscataway, New Jersey, 7–10 May 2000.Piscataway: IEEE Inc., 2000; vol 2: pp 973–976.
25.
ChengHDShiXJMinR: Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recognition2006; 39: 646–668.
26.
KinnardLLoSCBWangP: Segmentation of mammographic masses using fuzzy shadow and maximum-likelihood analysis. In: 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Proceedings, 7–10 July 2002, Washington DC, USA.Piscataway: IEEE Inc., pp 241–244.
27.
ThangavelKKarnanMSivakumarR: Automatic detection of microcalcification in mammograms—a review. ICGST-GVIP2005; 5: 31–61.
