Breast cancer is a leading cause of female mortality and its early detection is an important means of reducing this. The present study investigated an approach, based on fuzzy clustering, to detect small lesions, such as microcalcifications and other masses, that are hard to recognize in breast cancer screening. A total of 180 mammograms were analysed and classified by radiologists into three groups (n = 60 per group): those with microcalcifications; those with tumours; and those with no lesions. Twenty mammograms were taken as training data sets from each of the groups. The algorithm was then applied to the data not taken for training. Analysis by fuzzy clustering achieved a mean accuracy of 99.7% compared with the radiologists' findings. It was concluded that the fuzzy clustering algorithm allowed for more efficient and accurate detection of breast lesions and may improve the early detection of breast tumours.
PalNRBhowmickBPatelSK: A multistage neural network aided system for detection of micro-calcifications in digitized mammograms. Neurocomputing2008; 71: 2625–2634.
2.
ZhouXHGordonR: Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects. Crit Rev Biomed Eng1989; 17: 203–255.
3.
NassSJBallJ: Improving Breast Imaging Quality Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005.
4.
ChanHPDoiKGalhotraS: Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography I. Automated detection of microcalcification in mammography. Med Phys1987; 14: 538–548.
5.
ChanHPDoiKVybornyCJ: Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study. Invest Radiol1988; 9: 664–671.
6.
DaviesDHDanceDR: The automatic computer detection of subtle calcifications in radiographically dense breasts. Phys Med Biol1992; 37: 1385–1390.
7.
ZhengBChangYHStaigerM: Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol1995; 2: 655–662.
8.
YoshidaHDoiKNishikawaRM: An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Acad Radiol1996; 3: 621–627.
9.
LeichterILedermanRBuchbinderS: Optimizing parameters for computer-aided diagnosis of microcalcifications at mammography. Acad Radiol2000; 7: 406–412.
10.
LeeSLoCWangC: A computer-aided design mammography screening system for detection and classification of microcalcifications. Int J Med Inform2000; 60: 29–57.
11.
YuSGuanL: A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2000; 19: 115–126.
12.
VermaBZakosJ: A computer-aided diagnosis system for digital mammograms based on fuzzy-neural and feature extraction techniques. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed2001; 5: 46–54.
13.
GavrielidesMALoJYFloydCEJr: Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for the segmentation of microcalcification clusters in mammograms. Med Phys2002; 29: 475–483.
14.
PapadopoulosAFotiadisDILikasA: An automatic microcalcification detection system based on a hybrid neural network classifier. Artif Intell Med2002; 25: 149–167.
15.
MiniMGThomasT: A neural network method for mammography analysis based on statistical features. IEEE Xplore2003; 4: 1489–1492.
16.
PapadopoulosAFotiadisDILikasA: Characterization of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms using neural networks and support vector machines. Artif Intell Med2005; 34: 141–150.
SajdaPSpenceCPearsonJ: Learning contextual relationships in mammograms using a hierarchical pyramid neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2002; 21: 239–250.
19.
LiLZhengYZhangL: False-positive reduction in CAD mass detection using a competitive classification strategy. Med Phys2001; 28: 250–258.
20.
YuSGuanLBrownS: Automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films. J Electronic Imaging1999; 8: 76–82.
21.
El-NaqaIYongyiYWernickMN: A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2002; 21: 1552–1563.
22.
FerrariRJde CarvalhoACPLFMarquesPM Azevedo: Computerized classification of breast lesions: shape and texture analysis using an artificial neural network. Seventh International Conference on Image Processing and Its Applications (Conf. Publ. No. 465)1999; 2: 517–521 (DOI: 10.1049/cp:19990376).
23.
HeinleinPDrexlJSchneiderW: Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2003; 22: 402–413.
24.
LemaurGDrouicheKDeConinckJ: Highly regular wavelets for the detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2003; 22: 393–401.
25.
RegentovaEZhangLZhengJ: Microcalcification detection based on wavelet domain hidden Markov tree model: study for inclusion to computer aided diagnostic prompting system. Med Phys2007; 34: 2206–2219.
26.
TsujiiOFreedmanMTMunSK: Classification of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using trend-oriented radial basis function neural network. Pattern Recognition1999; 32: 891–903.
27.
Soltanian-ZadehHRafiee-RadFPourabdollah-NejadSD: Comparison of multiwavelet, wavelet, Haralick, and shape features for microcalcification classification in mammograms. Pattern Recognition2004; 37: 1973–1986.
28.
FuJCLeeSKWongSTC: Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications. Comput Med Imaging Graph2005; 29: 419–429.
29.
VeldkampWJKarssemeijerNOttenJD: Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types. Med Phys2000; 27: 2600–2608.
30.
GavrielidesMALoJYVoracekR Vargas: Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med Phys2000; 27: 13–22.
31.
JiangJYaoBWasonAM: Integration of fuzzy logic and structure tensor towards mammogram contrast enhancement. Comput Med Imaging Graph2005; 29: 83–90.
32.
BhattacharyaMDasA: Fuzzy logic based segmentation of microcalcification in breast using digital mammograms considering multiresolution. Proceedings of the International Machine Vision and Image Processing Conference 2007; 98–105.
33.
QuFHHuYTYangY: Unsupervised kernel fuzzy clustering based on differential evolution algorithm in intelligent materials system. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing2011; 105: 189–192.
34.
GrollLJakelJ: A new convergence proof of fuzzy C-means. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems2005; 13: 717–720 (DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2005.856560).
35.
SelviSTMalmathanrajR: Segmentation and SVM classification of mammograms. The IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology 2006; pp 905–910 (DOI: 10.1109/ICIT.2006. 372262).
36.
DingCHQDubchakI: Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Bioinformatics2001; 17: 349–358.
37.
BalafarMARamliARSaripanMI: New multi-scale medical image segmentation based on fuzzy C-mean (FCM). The 2008 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications, 2008; pp 66–70 (DOI: 10.1109/CITISIA. 2008.4607337).
