Staff’s representations of offenders are known to impact their interactions with the offenders they work with, but settings involving justice-involved youth remain understudied. This study addressed this research gap by using reflexive thematic analysis to explore French juvenile justice social workers’ representations of justice-involved youth. Semi-structured interviews with 24 participants revealed a diversity of representations. Most participants saw youth offenders’ adverse childhood experiences as mitigating factors in the acts committed and as justification for adopting a welfare-based approach to juvenile justice. We discuss the consequences of the lack of a shared rehabilitation model to guide youth justice interventions.
AstridgeBLiWWMcDermottBLonghitanoCA (2023) A systematic review and meta-analysis on adverse childhood experiences: Prevalence in youth offenders and their effects on youth recidivism. Child Abuse & Neglect140: 106055.
5.
BarryLCAdamsKBZauggDNoujaimD (2020) Health-care needs of older women prisoners: Perspectives of the health-care workers who care for them. Journal of Women & Aging32(2): 183–202.
6.
BickleKCesaroniC (2024) Canadian Youth correctional officers’ views on their work and relationships with youth in their care. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Epub ahead of print 22 April. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X241246096.
7.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
8.
BraunVClarkeV (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health11(4): 589–597.
9.
BraunVClarkeV (2021) Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research21(1): 37–47.
10.
BullockKBunceA (2020) ‘The prison don’t talk to you about getting out of prison’: On why prisons in England and Wales fail to rehabilitate prisoners. Criminology & Criminal Justice20(1): 111–127.
11.
BurnettRMcNeillF (2005) The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation Journal52(3): 221–242.
12.
CaseSBatemanT (2020) The punitive transition in youth justice: Reconstructing the child as offender. Children & Society34(6): 475–491.
13.
CaseSHampsonK (2019) Youth justice pathways to change: Drivers, challenges and opportunities. Youth Justice19(1): 25–41.
14.
CauffmanEGillespieMLBeardsleeJDavisFHernandezMWilliamsT. (2023) Adolescent contact, lasting impact? Lessons learned from two longitudinal studies spanning 20 years of developmental science research with justice-system-involved youths. Psychological Science in the Public Interest24(3): 133–161.
15.
CullenFTGendreauP (2001) From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal81(3): 313–338.
16.
DraperCEErringtonSOmarSMakhitaS (2013) The therapeutic benefits of sport in the rehabilitation of young sexual offenders: A qualitative evaluation of the fight with insight programme. Psychology of Sport and Exercise14(4): 519–530.
17.
EllisKCurtisP (2021) Care(ful) relationships: Supporting children in secure care. Child & Family Social Work26(3): 329–337.
18.
FordeL (2021) Welfare, justice, and diverse models of youth justice: A children’s rights analysis. The International Journal of Children’s Rights29(4): 920–945.
19.
GalardiTRSetterstenRA (2018) ‘They’re just made up different’: Juvenile correctional staff perceptions of incarcerated boys and girls. Children and Youth Services Review95: 200–208.
20.
Gibson-MorganE (2012) The handling of youth offending in England and in France. In: PickardSNativelCPortier-Le CocqF (eds) Les politiques de la jeunesse au Royaume-Uni et en France. Rue des Irlandais: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle, 91–109. Available at: http://books.openedition.org/psn/6902 (accessed 2 April 2024).
21.
GlowaczFPugliaRDevillersB (2020) Mineurs judiciarisés pour délit sexuel: soutien de la désistance par le Good Lives Model. Criminologie53(1): 127–149.
22.
GuarnacciaCDe VitaESortinoLGiannoneF (2022) Links between adverse childhood experiences, psychopathological symptoms and recidivism risk in juvenile delinquents. European Journal of Criminology19(5): 1040–1059.
23.
HamiltonVL (1978) Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology41(4): 316.
24.
HaqaneeZPeterson- BadaliMSkillingT (2015) Making ‘what works’ work: Examining probation officers’ experiences addressing the criminogenic needs of juvenile offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation54(1): 37–59.
25.
HeiderF (1958) The naive analysis of action. In: HeiderF (ed.) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 79–124. Available at: http://content.apa.org/books/10628-004 (accessed 1 September 2023).
26.
HepburnJRAlbonettiC (1980) ROLE CONFLICT IN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS. An Empirical Examination of the Treatment-Custody Dilemma Among Correctional Staff. Criminology17(4): 445–460.
27.
KingS (2013) Transformative agency and desistance from crime. Criminology & Criminal Justice13(3): 317–335.
28.
KirkwoodS (2016) Desistance in action: An interactional approach to criminal justice practice and desistance from offending. Theoretical Criminology20(2): 220–237.
29.
LeonardiRJBuchanan-SmithHMMcIvorGVickSJ (2017) ‘You think you’re helping them, but they’re helping you too’: Experiences of Scottish male young offenders participating in a dog training program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health14(8): 945.
30.
McCuishELussierPRocqueM (2020) Maturation beyond Age: Interrelationships among psychosocial, adult role, and identity maturation and their implications for desistance from crime. Journal of Youth and Adolescence49(2): 479–493.
31.
McMahonGJumpD (2018) Starting to stop: Young offenders’ desistance from crime. Youth Justice18(1): 3–17.
32.
McNeillF (2006) A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology & Criminal Justice6(1): 39–62.
33.
MalterudKSiersmaVDGuassoraAD (2016) Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research26(13): 1753–1760.
34.
MalvasoCGDelfabbroPDayA (2018) The Maltreatment–Offending Association: A systematic review of the methodological features of prospective and longitudinal studies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse19(1): 20–34.
35.
MarunaSFarrallS (2004) Desistance from crime: A theoretical reformulation. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie43(2): 171–194.
MoffittTE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review100(4): 674–701.
39.
MuncieJ (2008) The ‘Punitive Turn’ in juvenile justice: Cultures of control and rights compliance in Western Europe and the USA. Youth Justice8(2): 107–121.
40.
PaskoLLopezV (2018) The Latina penalty: Juvenile correctional attitudes toward the Latina juvenile offender. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice16(4): 272–291.
41.
PetrichDM (2020) A self-determination theory perspective on human agency, desistance from crime, and correctional rehabilitation. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology6(3): 353–379.
42.
RicciardelliRAdorjanMPetersA (2019) Increased clarity or continued ambiguity? Correctional officers’ experiences of the evolving Canadian youth justice legislation. Crime, Law and Social Change71(5): 503–523.
43.
RocqueM (2015) The lost concept: The (re)emerging link between maturation and desistance from crime. Criminology & Criminal Justice15(3): 340–360.
44.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology25(1): 54–67.
45.
RyanRMDeciEL (2008) A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne49(3): 186–193.
46.
RyanRMDeciEL (2018) Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Paperback edition. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
47.
SabbeMMoysonSSchiffinoN (2021) Citizen-agency versus state-agency at the frontline in prisons and probation services: A systematic literature review. Social Policy & Administration55(1): 206–225.
48.
SalléeN (2021) Discipline in new clothes: The controversial use of punishments in a Montreal rehabilitation centre for young offenders. The British Journal of Criminology62: 1380–1394.
49.
SassoLDeloguBCarrozzinoRAleoGBagnascoA (2018) Ethical issues of prison nursing: A qualitative study in Northern Italy. Nursing Ethics25(3): 393–409.
50.
SibisiMWarriaA (2020) Challenges experienced by probation officers working with children in conflict with the law in the Johannesburg Metro Region (South Africa). Children and Youth Services Review113: 104949.
51.
SpencerDRicciardelliR (2017) ‘They’re a very sick group of individuals’: Correctional officers, emotions, and sex offenders. Theoretical Criminology21(3): 380–394.
52.
TremblayM-A (1957) The key informant technique: A nonethnographic application. American Anthropologist59(4): 688–701.
53.
TroendléCAmielM (2018) Une adolescence entre les murs: l’enfermement, dans les limites de l’éducatif, du thérapeutique et du répressif. N° 726 (2017-2018), tome I, 25September. Available at: https://www.senat.fr/rap/r17-726-1/r17-726-11.pdf (accessed 18 August 2023).
54.
UmamaheswarJ (2013) Bringing hope and change: A study of youth probation officers in Toronto. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology57(9): 1158–1182.
55.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (2007) General Comment No. 10 (2007): Children’s rights in juvenile justice. CRC/C/GC/10. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/crc/2007/en/43085 (accessed 15 March 2024).
56.
VilleneuveM-PF-DufourIFarrallS (2020) Désistement assisté en contexte formel: une étude de la portée. Criminologie53(1): 41–71.
57.
WardTStewartC (2003) Criminogenic needs and human needs: A theoretical model. Psychology, Crime & Law9(2): 125–143.
58.
WardTMannREGannonTA (2007) The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior12(1): 87–107.
59.
WilliamsDCollingwoodLColesJSchmeerS (2015) Evaluating a rugby sport intervention programme for young offenders. Journal of Criminal Psychology5(1): 51–64.
60.
WilligC (2008) Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Adventures in Theory and Method, 2nd Edition.Maidenhead: Open University Press.
