The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model is widely used to understand criminal behavior and guide interventions to reduce recidivism. However, its implementation in China’s juvenile justice system has not been extensively explored. This research critically examines China’s adaptation of the RNR model, noting differences from the original framework. While China emphasizes rehabilitation, its juvenile justice system prioritizes stability and risk prevention. By employing participant observation, interviews, and document analysis, this study suggests that China’s selective adaptation of the RNR model supports rehabilitation rhetoric in juvenile justice while maintaining the state’s role in risk management and promoting social stability.
AndrewsDABontaJWormithJS (2006) The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency52(1): 7–27.
2.
AndrewsDABontaJ (2010) Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law16(1): 39–55.
3.
BiddulphSNesossiETrevaskesS (2017) Criminal justice reform in the Xi Jinping era. China Law and Society Review2(1): 63–128.
4.
BontaJ (1996) Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In: HarlandAT (ed.) Choosing Correctional Options That Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 18–32.
5.
BontaJAndrewsDA (2007) Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation6(1): 1–22.
6.
BontaJAndrewsDA (2016) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. New York: Routledge.
7.
BowenGA (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal9(2): 27–40.
8.
ChuaJRChuCMYimGChongDTeohJ (2014) Implementation of the Risk–Need–Responsivity framework across the juvenile justice agencies in Singapore. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law21(6): 877–889.
9.
FengC (2013) The dilemma of stability preservation in China. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs42(2): 3–19.
10.
FengS (2001) Crime and social control in a changing China. In: ZhangLNLiuJH (eds) Crime and Social Control in a Changing China. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 123–132.
11.
FuH (2018) The July 9th (709) crackdown on human rights lawyers: Legal advocacy in an authoritarian state. Journal of Contemporary China27(112): 554–568.
12.
GendreauP (1996) The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In: HarlandAT (ed.) Choosing Correctional Options That Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 117–130.
13.
GraziadeiM (2019) Comparative law, transplants, and receptions. In: MathiasRReinhardZ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 442–473.
14.
HeXFengJ (2021) Unfamiliarity and procedural justice: Litigants’ attitudes toward civil justice in southern China. Law & Society Review55(1): 104–138.
15.
JiangJChenX (2024) Conscience and convenience: How social workers pursue rehabilitation in Chinese community corrections. Law & Social Inquiry49: 853–876.
16.
KoehlerJALöselFAkoensiTDHumphreysDK (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of young offender treatment programmes in Europe. Journal of Experimental Criminology9: 19–43.
17.
KonopkaG (1963) Social Group Work: A Helping Process. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
LeiJCaiTChanCK (2023) Contractual controls and pragmatic professionalism: A qualitative study on contracting social services in China. Critical Social Policy43(1): 97–118.
19.
LengSCChiuH (1985) Criminal Justice in Post-Mao China: Analysis and Documents. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20.
LiE (2015) China’s community corrections: An actuarial model of punishment. Crime, Law and Social Change64: 11–22.
21.
LiE (2022) Rehabilitation in a risk society: ‘The case of China’. In: VanstoneM (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Rehabilitation in Criminal Justice. Cham: Springer, 89–106.
22.
LiESuM (2020) From punishment to control: Assessing juvenile diversion in China. Law & Social Inquiry45(2): 372–397.
23.
LiuY (2012) New exploration of criminal justice social workers’ participation in prevention of juvenile prisoners’ reoffending. Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Research1: 849–854.
24.
LuH (1999) Bang Jiao and reintegrative shaming in China’s urban neighborhoods. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice23(1): 115–125.
25.
MaQ (2002) The governance of NGOs in China since 1978: How much autonomy?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly31(3): 305–328.
26.
MackNWoodsongCMacQueenKMGuestG (2005) Qualitative Research Methods. London: Family Health International.
27.
McConvilleM (2011) Criminal Justice in China: An Empirical Inquiry. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
28.
MonahanJ (2006) A jurisprudence of risk assessment: Forecasting harm among prisoners, predators, and patients. Virginia Law Review92: 391–435.
29.
MouY (2017) The constructed truth: The making of police dossiers in China. Social & Legal Studies26(1): 69–88.
30.
MouY (2022) Accountable for a lifetime: Reforms in prosecutorial accountability in China. China Law and Society Review6(1): 1–43.
31.
PengWFuL (2021) On the provisions on the age of criminal responsibility in Criminal Law Amendment (Eleventh). Issues on Juvenile Crimes and Delinquency1: 20–32.
32.
PerlmanHH (1957) Social Casework: A Problem Solving Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
PotterPB (2004) Legal reform in China: Institutions, culture, and selective adaptation. Law & Social Inquiry29(2): 465–495.
34.
ShenAQ (2016) The role of the study–work school: A Chinese case study on early intervention and child-centred juvenile justice. Youth Justice16(2): 95–112.
35.
ShlonskyAWagnerD (2005) The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management. Children and Youth Services Review27: 4409–4427.
36.
SongXZhaoHLouTWangYZhengM (2021) Comparison of mindfulness with and without practice among women in custody. Criminal Justice and Behavior48(8): 1111–1126.
37.
SpiresAJ (2011) Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology117(1): 1–45.
38.
TrevaskesS (2016) Using Mao to package criminal justice discourse in 21st-century China. The China Quarterly226: 299–318.
39.
TroyerRJ (1989) Chinese thinking about crime and social control. In: RojekDGClarkJPTroyerRJ (eds) Social Control in the People’s Republic of China. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 45–56.
40.
WangD (2020) Research on basic issues of lowering the age of criminal responsibility of minors. Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law22(4): 74–89.
41.
XiX (2016) The practical dilemma and action tactics of China’s juvenile justice social work – The case of city B. Sociology and Social Work31(6): 25–35.
42.
YinRK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, vol. 5. London: Sage.
43.
YuW (2020) The exploration of the social governance path in the juvenile criminal law’s assistance and education system for minors. New Generation19(1): 67–71.
44.
ZhangJ (2016) Testing the predictive validity of the LSI-R using a sample of young male offenders on probation in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology60(4): 456–468.
45.
ZhangJLiuN (2015) Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LSI-R with probationers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology59(13): 1474–1486.
46.
ZhangLZhouDMessnerSFLiskaAEKrohnMDLiuJLuZ (1996) Crime prevention in a communitarian society: Bang-Jiao and Tiao-Jie in the People’s Republic of China. Justice Quarterly13(2): 199–222.
ZhaoG (2013) Juvenile criminal justice system in China. In: CaoLQSunLYHebentonSB (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Criminology. New York: Routledge, 103–115.
