This study proposes a standard costs method to evaluate the total direct costs of a juvenile justice system and applies it to the Italian case. The proposed cost-analysis method based on standard costs by offense-related groups illustrates how it can be implemented for improving the quality of management and cost monitoring. An illustrative cost-benefit analysis of the costs of juvenile justice in Italy shows that investments in rehabilitation programs are highly attractive even during a period of economic crisis and in very different regions.
AosSPhippsPBarnoskiRLiebR (2001) The Comparative Costs and Benefits of Programs to Reduce Crime. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy (WSIPP).
2.
BakerJJ (2002) Medicare payment system for hospital patients: Diagnosis related groups. Journal of Health Care Finance28(3): 1–13.
3.
BalaMMauskopfJWoodL (1999) Willingness to pay as a measure of health benefits. PharmacoEconomics15(1): 9–18.
4.
BarbagliMColomboASavonaE (2003) Sociologia della Devianza. Bologna: Il Mulino.
5.
BartonWButtsJ (1990) Viable options: Intense supervision programs for juvenile delinquents. Crime and Delinquency36(2): 238–256.
6.
BeckerGS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy76(2): 169–217.
7.
BowlesRCohenM (2008) Pre-Trial Detention: A Cost-Benefit Approach. London: Department for International Development & Open Society Justice Initiative.
8.
CohenMA (1998) The monetary value of saving a high-risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology14(1): 5–33.
9.
de BlasioGMenonC (2016) Down and out in Italian towns: A measure of the impact of economic downturns on crime. Economics Letters146: 99–102.
10.
DrummondMFSculpherMJClaxtonKStoddartGLTorranceGW (2015) Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
DünkelFGrzywaJHorsfieldPPruinI (2011) Juvenile Justice Systems in Europe: Current Situation and Reform Developments. Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg.
12.
ECJJ (2012) The Evaluation of the Implementation of International Standards in European Juvenile Justice System. IJJO Green Paper on Child Friendly Justice. Brussels: International Juvenile Justice Observatory.
13.
EspositoGLanauSPompeS (2014) Judicial system reform in Italy: A key to growth. International Monetary Fund Working Paper no. 32. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
14.
GattiUVerdeA (2002) Comparative juvenile justice: An overview on Italy. In: WinterdikJ (ed.) Juvenile Justice Systems: International Perspectives. Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Scholars Press, 297–320.
15.
HenggelerSWSchoenwaldSKBorduinCMRowlandMDCunninghamPB (1998) Multisystemic Treatment of Antisocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents. New York: The Guilford Press.
16.
HolmanBZiedenbuergJ (2006) The dangers of detention: The impact of incarcerating youth in detention and other secure facilities. Report, Justice Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
17.
International Juvenile Justice Observatory (IJJO) (2011) Green Paper on Child-Friendly Justice. Measures of Deprivation of Liberty for Young Offenders: How to Enrich International Standards in Juvenile Justice and Promote Alternatives to Detention in Europe?Brussels: IJJO.
18.
International Juvenile Justice Observatory (IJJO) (2013) Save Money, Protect Society and Realise Youth Potential. Improving Youth Justice Systems during a Time of Economic Crisis. Brussels: IJJO.
Jacomy-ViteS (2011) The Social Reintegration of Young Offenders as a Key Factor to Prevent Recidivism. IJJO Green Paper on Child Friendly Justice (European Council for Juvenile Justice, NGO Section). Brussels: International Juvenile Justice Observatory.
21.
JenkinsSBrandoliniAMicklewrightJNolanB (2013) The Great Recession and the Household Distribution of Incomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
KilkellyU (2011) Measures of Deprivation of Liberty for Young Offenders: How to Enrich International Standards in Juvenile Justice and Promote Alternatives to Detention in Europe. IJJO Green Paper on Child-Friendly Justice (European Council for Juvenile Justice, Academic Section). Brussels: International Juvenile Justice Observatory.
23.
KuntzLScholtesSVeraA (2008) DRG cost weight volatility and hospital performance. OR Spectrum30(2): 331–354.
24.
LargAMossJR (2011) Cost-of-illness studies: A guide to critical evaluation. PharmacoEconomics9(8): 653–671.
25.
LevittSDLochnerL (2001) The determinants of juvenile crime. In: GruberJ (ed.) Risk Behavior among Youths: An Economic Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 327–374.
26.
LundbergMWuermliA (2012) Children and Youth in Crisis: Protecting and Promoting Human Development in Times of Economic Shocks. Washington, DC: World Bank.
27.
McAraLMcVieS (2007) Youth justice? The impact of system contact on patterns of desistance from offending. European Journal of Criminology4(3): 315–345.
28.
MayesR (2007) The origins, development, and passage of Medicare’s revolutionary prospective payment system. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences62(1): 21–55.
29.
MenonMPeraliFVeronesiM (2017) Leaving no child behind: Preferences for social inclusion and altruism. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy17(3): 1–19.
30.
NelkenD (2006) Italian juvenile justice: Tolerance, leniency or indulgence?Youth Justice6(2): 107–128.
31.
OECD (2013) What makes civil justice effective. OECD Economic Department Policy Notes no. 18. Paris: OECD.
32.
PadovaniABruttoSCiappiS (2011) Italy. In: DünkelFGrzywaJHorsfieldPPruinI (eds) Juvenile Justice Systems in Europe: Current Situation and Reform Developments. Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg, 765–801.
33.
PruinI (2011) The Evaluation of the Implementation of International Standards in European Juvenile Justice Systems. IJJO Green Paper on Child-Friendly Justice (European Council for Juvenile Justice, Administrative Section). Brussels: International Juvenile Justice Observatory.
34.
RuxtonS (2012) How the economic and financial crisis is affecting children and young people in Europe. Report, Eurochild, Brussels.
35.
WilsonA (2010) Interrupted life: The criminal justice system as a disruptive force on the lives of young offenders. Prison Service Journal189: 3–8.
