Hardin’s legacy in planning is highly relevant to current concerns, as planners shape the management of resources in the face of climate change and urbanization. Through a broad literature review of planning articles citing Hardin’s ‘Tragedy of the Commons’ we find out that Hardin’s suggestions are rejected by planning theory, yet have been implemented in planning practice. However, the rejection of Hardin’s suggestions, has evolved in an ongoing and growing ‘commons trend’ in social science. We review the presence of this trend in contemporary planning literature. Our results call for a turn towards the commons in planning, that is, for a dialogue between planning and the heterogeneous ideas embedded within the commons trend – a necessary endeavour if we are to address several critical planning questions of today.
AgnewJ (2011) Waterpower: Politics and the geography of water provision. Annals of the Association of American Geographers101(3): 463–476. DOI:10.1080/00045608.2011.560053
Agudelo-VeraCMMelsARKeesmanKJ, et al. (2011) Resource management as a key factor for sustainable urban planning. Journal of Environmental Management92(10): 2295–2303. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.016.
4.
AlexanderER (1984) After rationality, what? A review of responses to paradigm breakdown. Journal of the American Planning Association50(1): 62–69. DOI:10.1080/01944368408976582.
5.
AlexanderER (2005) Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Planning Theory4(3): 209–223. DOI:10.1177/1473095205058494.
6.
AndersonARJackSL (2002) The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: A glue or a lubricant?Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal14(3): 193–210. DOI: 10.1080/08985620110112079.
BaetenG (2000) The tragedy of the highway: Empowerment, disempowerment and the politics of sustainability discourses and practices. European Planning Studies8(1): 69–86. DOI: 10.1080/096543100110938.
9.
BakkerK (2009) Neoliberal nature, ecological fixes, and the pitfalls of comparative research. Environment and Planning A41(8): 1781–1787. DOI: 10.1068/a4277.
BeatleyT (1989) Environmental ethics and planning theory. Journal of Planning Literature4(1): 1–32. DOI: 10.1177/088541228900400101.
12.
BeecoJABrownG (2013) Integrating space, spatial tools, and spatial analysis into the human dimensions of parks and outdoor recreation. Applied Geography38: 76–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.013.
13.
BerlantL (2016) The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space34(3): 393–419. DOI: 10.1177/0263775816645989.
14.
Bingham-HallJ (2016) Future of cities: Commoning and collective approaches to urban space. In: Future of Cities. London, UK: Government Office for Science.
15.
BlackmarE (2013) Appropriating ‘the commons’: The tragedy of property rights discourse. In: LowSSmithN (ed), The Politics of Public Space. New York: Routlege.
16.
BlowersA (1997) Environmental policy: Ecological modernisation or the risk society?Urban Studies34(5–6): 845–871. DOI: 10.1080/0042098975853.
BonnesMBonaiutoM (2002) Environmental psychology: From spatial-physical environment to sustainable development. In: BechtelRBChurchmanA (eds) Handbook of Environmental Psychology, Hoboken, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 28–54.
19.
BorchCKornbergerM (eds), (2015). Urban commons: Rethinking the city. New York: Routledge.
20.
BoydE (2009) Governing the clean development mechanism: Global rhetoric versus local realities in carbon sequestration projects. Environment and Planning A41(10): 2380–2395. DOI: 10.1068/a41341.
BriassoulisH (2004) The institutional complexity of environmental policy and planning problems: The example of Mediterranean desertification. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management47(1): 115–135. DOI: 10.1080/0964056042000189835.
23.
BrinkleyCVitielloD (2014) From farm to nuisance: Animal agriculture and the rise of planning regulation. Journal of Planning History13(2): 113–135.
24.
BrinkleyC (2019) Hardin’s imagined tragedy is pig shit: A call for planning to recenter the commons. Planning Theory19(1): 127–144. DOI: 10.1177/1473095218820460.
25.
BrodySDZahranSGroverH, et al. (2008) A spatial analysis of local climate change policy in the United States: Risk, stress, and opportunity. Landscape and Urban Planning87(1): 33–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.04.003.
26.
BurgerJGochfeldM (1998) The tragedy of the commons 30 years later. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development40(10): 4–13. DOI: 10.1080/00139159809605104.
27.
BollierD (2011) The Commons, Short and Sweet. http://www.bollier.org/commons-short-and-sweet.
CallaghanEGColtonJ (2008) Building sustainable & resilient communities: a balancing of community capital. Environment, Development and Sustainability10(6): 931–942. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-007-9093-4.
30.
CardenasJC (2000) How do groups solve local commons dilemmas? lessons from experimental economics in the field. Environment, Development and Sustainability2(3/4): 305–322. DOI: 10.1023/a:1011422313042.
31.
CastroJE (2004) Urban water and the politics of citizenship: The case of the mexico city metropolitan area during the 1980s and 1990s. Environment and Planning A36(2): 327–346. DOI: 10.1068/a35159.
32.
CerveroR (1991) Congestion relief: The land use alternative. Journal of Planning Education and Research10(2): 119–130. DOI: 10.1177/0739456x9101000209.
33.
ChettiparambA (2006) Metaphors in complexity theory and planning. Planning Theory5(1): 71–91. DOI: 10.1177/1473095206061022.
34.
CohrunSE (1994) Understanding and enhancing neighborhood sense of community. Journal of Planning Literature9(1): 92–99. DOI: 10.1177/088541229400900105.
35.
ColdingJBarthelS (2013) The potential of ‘Urban Green Commons’ in the resilience building of cities. Ecological economics86: 156–166.
36.
ConnellyS (2007) Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability12(3): 259–278. DOI: 10.1080/13549830601183289.
37.
ConroyW (2019) The biopolitical commons: A revised theory of urban land in the age of biopolitical production. Planning Theory18(4): 470–491.
38.
CouclelisH (1989) Macrostructure and microbehavior in a metropolitan area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design16(2): 141–154. DOI: 10.1068/b160141.
39.
DeadmanPJ (1999) Modelling individual behaviour and group performance in an intelligent agent-based simulation of the tragedy of the commons. Journal of Environmental Management56(3): 159–172. DOI: 10.1006/jema.1999.0272.
40.
De AngelisM (2007) The Beginning of History: Value Struggles and Global Capital. London: PlutoPress.
41.
De LangeMDe WaalM (2017) Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design. In: EtingoffK (ed), Urban Land Use Community-Based Planning. Oakville: Apple Academic Press Inc, pp. 89–137.
42.
DellenbaughMKipMBieniokMMüllerASchwegmannM (eds) (2015) Urban commons: moving beyond state and market. Birkhäuser, 154.
43.
DelsanteIBertolinoN (2017) Urban spaces’ commoning and its impact on planning: a case study of the former slaughterhouse exchange building in Milan. Der Offentliche Sektor - The Public Sector43(1): 45–56.
44.
EizenbergE (2012) Actually existing commons: Three moments of space of community gardens in New York City. Antipode44(3): 764–782. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00892.x.
45.
EizenbergE (2018) Patterns of self-organization in the context of urban planning: Reconsidering venues of participation. Planning Theory18(1): 40–57. DOI: 10.1177/1473095218764225.
46.
FainsteinS (2010) The Just City. London: Cornell University Press. DOI: 10.7591/j.ctt7zhwt.
47.
FitzpatrickD (2018) Book reviews: Common space: The city as commons and patterns of commoning. Planning Theory17(3): pp. 443–446. DOI: 10.1177/1473095217750671.
48.
ForsbergHMedwayDWarnabyG (1999) Town centre management by co-operation: Evidence from Sweden. Cities16(5): 315–322. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00029-3.
49.
GerberJDNahrathSCsikosP, et al. (2011) The role of swiss civic corporations in land-use planning. Environment and Planning A43(1): 185–204. DOI: 10.1068/a43293.
50.
GillespieTHardyKWattP (2018) Austerity urbanism and Olympic counter-legacies: Gendering, defending and expanding the urban commons in East London. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36(5): 812–830. DOI: 10.1177/0263775817753844.
51.
GoldinIVogelT (2010) Global governance and systemic risk in the 21st century: Lessons from the financial crisis. Global Policy1(1): 4–15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2009.00011.x.
52.
GreerA (2012) Commons and enclosure in the colonization of North America. The American Historical Review117(2): 365–386. DOI: 10.1086/ahr.117.2.365.
53.
GuhathakurtaSGoberP (2007) The impact of the phoenix urban heat Island on residential water use. Journal of the American Planning Association73(3): 317–329. DOI: 10.1080/01944360708977980.
54.
HardtMNegriA (2009) Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
HealeyP (1996) Consensus-building across difficult divisions: New approaches to collaborative strategy making. Planning Practice & Research11(2): 207–216. DOI: 10.1080/02697459650036350.
HuronA (2017) Theorising the urban commons: New thoughts, tensions and paths forward. Urban Studies54(4). doi: 10.1177/0042098016685528.
64.
InnesJE (1995) Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research14(3): 183–189. DOI: 10.1177/0739456x9501400307.
65.
JacobsHMPaulsenK (2009) Property rights: The neglected theme of 20th-century American planning. Journal of the American Planning Association75(2): 134–143. DOI: 10.1080/01944360802619721.
66.
JentoftSChuenpagdeeR (2009) Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy33(4): 553–560. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.12.002.
67.
JepsonEJ (2004) Human nature and sustainable development: A strategic challenge for planners. Journal of Planning Literature19(1): 3–15. DOI: 10.1177/0885412204264529.
68.
JohnsonMP (2001) Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space33(4): 717–735. DOI: 10.1068/a3327.
69.
KalsESchumacherDMontadaL (1999) Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior31(2): 178–202. DOI: 10.1177/00139169921972056.
70.
KelleherCLoweryD (2004) Political participation and metropolitan institutional contexts. Urban Affairs Review39(6): 720–757. DOI: 10.1177/1078087404264219.
KlostermanRE (1980) A public interest criterion. Journal of the American Planning Association46(3): 323–333. DOI: 10.1080/01944368008977047.
73.
KmiecDW (1981) Deregulating land use: An alternative free enterprise development system. University of Pennsylvania Law Review130(1): 28. DOI: 10.2307/3311810.
74.
KostakisVNiarosVDafermosG, et al. (2015) Design global, manufacture local: Exploring the contours of an emerging productive model. Futures73: 126–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.09.001.
75.
LaerhovenFOstromE (2007) Traditions and trends in the study of the commons. International Journal of the Commons1(1): 3–28. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.76.
76.
LaiLWLorneF (2006) The coase theorem and planning for sustainable development. Town Planning Review77(1): 41–73. DOI: 10.3828/tpr.77.1.4.
77.
LefebvreH (1968) The Right to the City. 2nd edition. Paris: Anthropos.
78.
LefebvreH (1974) The Production of Space. Oxford: Donald Nicholson-Smith trans.Basil Blackwell.
79.
LevinSXepapadeasTCrépinAS, et al. (2013) Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: Modeling and policy implications. Environment and Development Economics18(02): 111–132. DOI: 10.1017/s1355770x12000460.
80.
LinebaughP (2008) The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All. Berkeley: University of California Press.
81.
LinehanJRGrossM (1998) Back to the future, back to basics: the social ecology of landscapes and the future of landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning42(2–4): 207–223. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2046(98)00088-7.
82.
LundgrenLBurnetPHardinG, et al. (1999) The tragedy of the commons revisited. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development41(2): 4–45. DOI: 10.1080/00139157.1999.10544058.
83.
MarcuseP (2009) From justice planning to commons planning. In: MarcusePConnollyJNovyJ, et al. (eds), Searching for the Just City Debates in Urban Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 91–102.
84.
MartinKS (2005) Mapping economic diversity in the First World: the case of fisheries. Environment and Planning A37(6): 959–979. DOI: 10.1068/a36296.
85.
MarwellGAmesRE (1981) Economists free ride, does anyone else?Journal of Public Economics15(3): 295–310. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(81)90013-x.
86.
McCarthyJ (2005) Devolution in the woods: Community forestry as hybrid neoliberalism. Environment and Planning A37(6): 995–1014. DOI: 10.1068/a36266.
87.
McGreevyMWilsonL (2017) The civic and neighbourhood commons as complex adaptive systems: The economic vitality of the centre. Planning Theory16(2): 169–185. DOI: 10.1177/1473095216631587.
88.
MooreT (1978) Why allow planners to do what they do? a justification from economic theory. Journal of the American Institute of Planners44(4): 387–398.
89.
MoriPA (2014) Community and cooperation: The evolution of cooperatives towards new models of citizens’ democratic participation in public services provision. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics85(3): 327–352. DOI: 10.1111/apce.12045.
90.
MüllerAK (2015) From urban commons to urban planning – or vice versa? “Planning” the contested gleisdreieck territory p.148-164. In: DellenbaughMKipMBieniokM, et al. (eds), Urban Commons Moving Beyond State and Market. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
91.
MussoleM (2009) Property rights, transaction costs and institutional change: Conceptual framework and literature review. Progress in Planning71(2): 43–85. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.002.
92.
NasarJL (1987) The effect of sign complexity and coherence on the perceived quality of retail scenes. Journal of the American Planning Association53(4): 499–509. DOI: 10.1080/01944368708977139.
93.
NelsonRHowdenMSmithMS (2008) Using adaptive governance to rethink the way science supports Australian drought policy. Environmental Science & Policy11(7): 588–601. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.06.005.
NeumanM (2005a) The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research25(1): 11–26. DOI: 10.1177/0739456x04270466.
96.
NeumanM (2005b) Notes on the uses and scope of city planning theory. Planning Theory4(2): 123–145. DOI: 10.1177/1473095205054601.
97.
OdumEP (2014) The strategy of Ecosystem development. In: NdubisiFO (ed), The Ecological Design and Planning Reader. Washington DC: Island Press, pp. 203–216. DOI: 10.5822/978-1-61091-491-8_20.
98.
O’ RiordanT (1977). Environmental ideologies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space9(1): 3–14. DOI: 10.1068/a090003.
99.
OstromE (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100.
OstromE (1999) Coping with the tragedy of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science2: 493–535.
101.
OstromE (2008) The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development50(4): 8–21. DOI: 10.3200/ENVT.50.4.8-21.
102.
PenningtonMRydinY (2000) Researching social capital in local environmental policy contexts. Policy & Politics28(2): 233–249. DOI: 10.1332/0305573002500947.
103.
PetersBG (1998) Managing horizontal government: the politics of coordination. Public Administration76(2): 295–311. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00102.
104.
PlummerRFennellD (2007) Exploring co-management theory: Prospects for sociobiology and reciprocal altruism. Journal of Environmental Management85(4): 944–955. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.003.
105.
PontingJO’ BrienD (2013) Liberalizing Nirvana: an analysis of the consequences of common pool resource deregulation for the sustainability of Fiji’s surf tourism industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism22(3): 384–402. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2013.819879.
PorterLLombardMHuxleyM, et al. (2011) Informality, the commons and the paradoxes for planning: Concepts and debates for informality and planning. Planning Theory & Practice12(1): 115–153.
108.
PortneyKEBerryJM (2010) Participation and the Pursuit of Sustainability in U.S. Cities. Urban Affairs Review46(1): 119–139. DOI: 10.1177/1078087410366122.
109.
PrudhamS (2009) Pimping climate change: Richard Branson, global warming, and the performance of green capitalism. Environment and Planning A41(7): 1594–1613. DOI: 10.1068/a4071.
110.
PutnamR (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
111.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and schuster.
112.
RankinKN (2002) Social capital, microfinance, and the politics of development. Feminist Economics8(1): 1–24. DOI: 10.1080/13545700210125167.
113.
ReedMGGillAM (1997) Tourism, recreational, and amenity values in land allocation: An analysis of institutional arrangements in the postproductivist era. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space29(11): 2019–2040. DOI: 10.1068/a292019.
114.
ReesWE (1995) Achieving sustainability: Reform or transformation?Journal of Planning Literature9(4): 343–361. DOI: 10.1177/088541229500900402.
115.
ReidRSFernández - GiménezMEGalvinKA (2014). Dynamics and resilience of rangelands and pastoral peoples around the globe. Annual Review of Environment and Resources39(1): 217–242. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-020713-163329.
116.
RobertsRSEmelJ (1992) Uneven development and the tragedy of the commons: Competing images for nature-society analysis. Economic Geography68(3): 249. DOI: 10.2307/144185.
117.
RoyA (2011) Urbanisms, worlding practices and the theory of planning. Planning Theory10(1): 6–15. DOI: 10.1177/1473095210386065.
118.
RydinY (1998) Land use planning and environmental capacity: Reassessing the use of regulatory policy tools to achieve sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management41(6): 749–765.
119.
SaundersFP (2014) The promise of common pool resource theory and the reality of commons projects. International Journal of the Commons8(2): 636–656. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.477.
120.
ScharpfFW (1997) Introduction: The problem-solving capacity of multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy4(4): 520–538. DOI: 10.1080/135017697344046.
121.
ShaferCSLeeBKTurnerS (2000) A tale of three greenway trails: user perceptions related to quality of life. Landscape and Urban Planning49(3–4): 163–178. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2046(00)00057-8.
122.
ShortCWinterM (1999) The problem of common land: Towards stakeholder governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management42(5): 613–630. DOI: 10.1080/09640569910911.
123.
ShoupDC (2011) The high cost of free parking. Journal of Planning Education and Research17(1): 3–20. DOI: 10.1177/0739456x9701700102.
124.
SmallKAWinstonCYanJ, et al. (2006) Differentiated road pricing, express lanes, and carpools: Exploiting heterogeneous preferences in policy design. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs189: 53–96.
125.
SobelRSLeesonPT (2006) Government’s response to Hurricane Katrina: A public choice analysis. Public Choice127(1–2): 55–73. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-006-7730-3.
126.
SouthgateCRJ (2006) Ecotourism in Kenya: The vulnerability of communities. Journal of Ecotourism5(1–2): 80–96. DOI: 10.1080/14724040608668448.
ThompsonRH (2004) Overcoming barriers to ecologically sensitive land management. Journal of Planning Education and Research24(2): 141–153. DOI: 10.1177/0739456x04269860.
129.
ToonenT (2010) Resilience in public administration: The Work of Elinor and Vincent Ostrom from a public administration perspective. Public Administration Review70(2): 193–202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02147.x.
130.
TurnerMD (2004) Political ecology and the moral dimensions of “resource conflicts”: The case of farmer–herder conflicts in the Sahel. Political Geography23(7): 863–889. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.05.009.
WalkerR (2004) Theorizing land-cover and land-use change: The case of tropical deforestation. International Regional Science Review27(3): 247–270. DOI: 10.1177/0160017604266026.
136.
WebsterCJ (1998) Public choice, pigouvian and coasian planning theory. Urban Studies35(1): 53–75.
137.
WebsterC (2007) Property rights, public space and urban design. Town Planning Review78(1): 81–101. DOI: 10.3828/tpr.78.1.6.
138.
WilsonPA (1997) Building social capital: A learning agenda for the twenty-first century. Urban Studies34(5–6): 745–760. DOI: 10.1080/0042098975808.
ZahranSBrodySDVedlitzA, et al. (2008) Vulnerability and capacity: Explaining local commitment to climate-change policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26(3): 544–562. DOI: 10.1068/c2g.
141.
ZellnerML (2008) Embracing complexity and uncertainty: The potential of agent-based modeling for environmental planning and policy. Planning Theory & Practice9(4): 437–457. DOI: 10.1080/14649350802481470.
142.
ZhuJ (2002) Urban development under ambiguous property rights: A case of China’s transition economy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26(1): 41–57. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00362.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
