The very marked differences that exist between the planning systems of continental
Europe and Britain are generally understood to be the result of contrasting legal
systems. This article explores the origins of the common-law tradition of England
and the way it came to influence public local administration. It seeks to
demonstrate the impact that common law has had on the way in which town planning is
conceptualized and some of the strengths and weaknesses that result.
Adler, M.
and
Asquith, S.
(eds) (1981) Discretion and Welfare.
London: Heinemann
.
2.
Aldridge, H.R.
(1915) The Case for Town Planning.
London: National Housing and Town Planning Council
.
3.
Allison, J.W.F.
(2000) The Continental Distinction in the Common Law: A
Historical and Comparative Perspective on English Public Law.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
4.
Ashworth, S.
(1993) `
Plymouth and After (II)
', Journal of Planning and Environment Law, December, pp.
1105—10
.
5.
Baker, J.H.
(2000) The Common Law Tradition: Lawyers, Books and the
Law.
London: Hambledon Press
.
6.
Bell, J.
(1992) `Discretionary Decision-making: A Jurisprudential
View', in
K. Hawkins
(ed.) The Uses of Discretion, pp.
89—111.
Oxford: Clarendon
.
7.
Booth, P.
(1996) Controlling Development: Certainty in Discretion in
Europe, the USA and Hong Kong.
London: UCL Press
.
8.
Booth, P.
(2002) `
Nationalising Development Rights: The Feudal Origins of the British
Planning System'
, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29:
129—39
.
9.
Booth, P.
(2003) Planning by Consent: The Origins and Nature of British
Development Control.
London: Routledge
.
10.
Bradshaw, J.
(1981) `From Discretion to Rules: The Experience of the
Family Fund', in
M. Adler
and
S. Asquith
(eds) Discretion and Welfare, pp.
135—47.
London: Heinemann
.
11.
Bull, D.
(1980) `
The Anti-discretion Movement in Britain: Fact or Phantom'
, Journal of Social Welfare Law3:
65—84
.
12.
Chew, H.M.
and
Kellaway, W.
(eds) (1973) London Assize of Nuisance 1301—1431:
A Calendar,
London Record Society
vol. 10.
Leicester: London Record Society
.
13.
Craig, P.
(1994) `
The Common Law, Reasons and Administrative Justice'
, Cambridge Law Journal53(2):
282—302
.
14.
Crow, S.
(1996) `
Development Control: The Child that Grew Up in the Cold'
, Planning Perspectives11:
399—411
.
15.
Davies, H.W.E.
(1980) `
The Relevance of Development Control
', Town Planning Review51(1):
5—17
.
16.
Davis, K.C.
(1971) Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry,
2nd edn.
Urbana: University of Illinois Press
.
17.
Dicey, A.V.
(1959) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the
Constitution , 10th edn.
London: Macmillan
.
18.
Dworkin, R.
(1977) Taking Rights Seriously.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
19.
Dyson, K.H.F.
(1980) The State Tradition in Western Europe.
London: Martin Robertson
.
20.
Forsyth, A.
(1999) `
Administrative Discretion and Urban and Regional Planners' Values'
, Journal of Planning Literature14(1):
5—15
.
21.
Gilbart, A.
(1993) `
Plymouth and After (I)
', Journal of Planning and Environment Law, December, pp.
1099—104
.
22.
Goodin, R.E.
(1986) `
Welfare, Rights and Discretion
', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies6(2):
232—61
.
23.
Harlow, C.
and
Rawlings, R.
(1997) Law and Administration, 2nd edn.
London: Butterworth
.
24.
Hawkins, K.
(1992) `The Use of Legal Discretion: Perspectives from Law
and Social Service', in
K. Hawkins
(ed.) The Uses of Discretion, pp.
11—46.
Oxford: Clarendon
.
25.
Hayek, F.A.
(1944) The Road to Serfdom.
London : Routledge and Kegan Paul
.
26.
Hennock, E.P.
(1973) Fit and Proper Persons; Ideal and Reality in 19th
Century Local Government.
London: Edward Arnold
.
27.
Journal of Planning and Environment Law (1995) `
Notes of Cases: Tesco Stores Ltd v. Secretary of State for the Environment
and Others
', pp.
581—604
.
28.
Jowell, J.
(1973) `
The Legal Control of Administrative Discretion'
, Public Law18:
178—220
.
29.
Jowell, J.
(2003) `Administrative Law', in
V. Bogdanor
(ed.) The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century, pp.
373—400.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
30.
Joyce, P.
(2003) The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern
City.
London: Verso
.
31.
Lacey, N.
(1992) `The Jurisprudence of Discretion: Escaping the Legal
Paradigm', in
K. Hawkins
(ed.) The Uses of Discretion, pp.
361—88.
Oxford : Clarendon
.
32.
Lambert, R.
(1962) `
Central and Local Relations in Mid-Victorian England: The Local Government
Act Office 1858—1871
', Victorian Studies6(2):
128—50
.
33.
Loengard, J.S.
(1989) London Viewers and their Certificates,
London Record Society
vol. 26.
London: London Record Society
.
34.
McAuslan, P.
(1975) Land Law and Planning: Cases, Materials and Text
.
London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson
.
35.
Milsom, S.F.C.
(1969) Historical Foundations of the Common Law.
London: Butterworth
.
36.
Newman, P.
and
Thornley, A.
(1996) Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition,
National Systems and Planning Projects.
London: Routledge
.
37.
Schneider, C.E.
(1992) `Discretion and Rules: A Lawyer's View', in
K. Hawkins
(ed.) The Uses of Discretion, pp.
47—88.
Oxford: Clarendon
.
38.
Sutcliffe, A.R.
(1981) Towards the Planned City: Germany, Britain, the United
States and France 1780—1914.
Oxford: Basil Blackwell
.
39.
Tewdwr-Jones, M.
(1999) `
Discretion, Flexibility and Certainty in British Planning: Emerging
Ideological Conflicts and Inherent Political Tensions'
, Journal of Planning Education and Research18:
244—56
.
40.
Van Caenegem, R.C.
(1988) The Birth of the English Common Law,
2nd edn.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
41.
Webb, S.
and
Webb, B.
(1906) English Local Government from the Revolution to the
Municipal Corporation Act: The Parish and the County.
London: Longman, Green
.
42.
Webb, S.
and
Webb, B.
(1927) English Local Government: English Poor Law History.
Part I: The Old Poor Law.
London: Longman, Green
.
43.
Webster, C.
and
Lai, W.-C.L.
(2003) Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing
Spontaneous Cities.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
.
44.
Wraith, R.E.
and
Lamb, G.B.
(1971) Public Inquiries as an Instrument of Government
.
London: Allen and Unwin
.
