The purpose of this article is to offer planning scholars a basis for criticizing authoritarian populism and not limiting ideological critique to neoliberalism. Authoritarian populism is anti-elitist, anti-pluralist and excluding in that the authentic people includes only part of the population. Authoritarian populists imagine a homogeneous people whose will determines policy. The article deals with confrontations and contact points between communicative planning theory and populist currents. It distils several core themes from five authoritative collections of works on planning theory and examines their relations with populist ideas. Authoritarian populism is an incomplete ideology that can fuse with various other ideologies. Amalgamations of populism and neoliberalism pose new challenges to participatory planning. Authoritarian populism criticizes planning institutions for blocking the immediate realization of the will of the people and being sympathetic to social diversity and cultural influence threatening heartland values. Neoliberalism is opposed to the welfare policies, equity goals, growth restrictions and other public interventions associated with spatial planning. Joint pressure from the two ideologies may alter the planning of liberal democracies in an autocratic direction.
AalbergTEsserFReinemannC, et al. (eds) (2017) Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge.
2.
AbdullahA (ed.) (2017) Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: Selected Statements and Speeches (Unpaginated). Seattle, WA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Kindle Direct Publishing.
3.
BaetenG (2018) Neoliberal planning. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 105–117.
4.
BeauregardRB (2000) Neither embedded nor embodied: Critical pragmatism and identity politics. In: BurayidiMA (ed.) Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society. London: Praeger, 53–66.
5.
BozkurtU (2013) Neoliberalism with a human face: Making sense of the Justice and Development Party’s neoliberal populism in Turkey. Science & Society77(3): 372–396.
6.
BurayidiM (ed.) (2015) Cities and the Politics of Difference: Multiculturalism and Diversity in Urban Planning. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
7.
CampanellaTJGodschalkDR (2012) Resilience. In: WeberRCraneR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. New York: Oxford University Press, 218–236.
8.
CaramaniD (2017) Will vs. reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review111(1): 54–67.
9.
ChienKH (2019) Polarizing informality: Processual thinking, materiality and the emerging middle-class informality in Taipei. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space51(6): 1225–1241.
10.
DagnaudMMehlD (1983) Elite, sub-elite, counter-elite. Social Science Information22: 817–865.
11.
De CleenB (2017) Populism and nationalism. In: KaltwasserCRTaggartPEspejoPO, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 342–362.
12.
EkströmMPatronaMThornborrowJ (2018) Right-wing populism and the dynamics of style: A discourse-analytic perspective on mediated political performances. Palgrave Communications4: 83.
13.
EltchaninoffM (2018) Inside the Mind of Marine Le Pen. London: C. Hurst.
14.
FainsteinSS (2018) Urban planning and social justice. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 130–142.
FilionP (2011) Toronto’s Tea Party: Right-wing populism and planning agendas. Planning Theory & Practice12(3): 464–469.
17.
FilionP (2018) Enduring features of the North American suburb: Built form, automobile orientation, suburban culture and political mobilization. Urban Planning3(4): 4–14.
18.
ForesterJ (2012) From good intentions to a critical pragmatism. In: WeberRCraneR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. New York: Oxford University Press, 285–305.
19.
FrauneCKnodtM (2018) Sustainable energy transformations in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance. Energy Research & Social Science43: 1–7.
20.
FreedenM (2017) After the Brexit referendum: Revisiting populism as an ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies22(1): 1–11.
21.
GimenezME (2006) With a little class: A critique of identity politics. Ethnicities6: 423–439.
22.
GrantJL (2018) Growth management theory: From the garden city to smart growth. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 41–52.
23.
GriggsSHowarthD (2008) Populism, localism and environmental politics: The logic and rhetoric of the Stop Stansted Expansion Campaign. Planning Theory7(2): 123−144.
24.
GualiniE (2010) Governance, space and politics: Exploring the governmentality of planning. In: HillierJHealeyP (eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate, 57–85.
25.
GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) (2018) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge.
26.
HallS (1980) Popular-democratic vs. authoritarian populism: Two ways of ‘taking democracy seriously’. In: HuntA (ed.) Marxism and Democracy. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 157–185.
27.
HealeyP (2012) Communicative planning: Practices, concepts, and rhetorics. In: SanyalBValeLJRosanCD (eds) Planning Ideas That Matter. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 335–357.
28.
HealeyP (2016) The planning project. In: FainsteinSSDeFilippisJ (eds) Readings in Planning Theory. 4th edn.Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 139–155.
29.
HillierJHealeyP (eds) (2010) The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate.
30.
HuxleyM (2018) Countering ‘the dark side’ of planning: Power, governmentality, counter-conduct. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 207–220.
31.
IvesonK (2014) Building a city for ‘the people’: The politics of alliance-building in the Sydney Green Ban Movement. Antipode46(4): 992−1013.
32.
KatzBNowakJ (2017) The New Localism: How Cities Can Thrive in the Age of Populism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33.
KojolaE (2019) Bringing back the mines and a way of life: Populism and the politics of extraction. Annals of the American Association of Geographers109(2): 371–381.
34.
LamontMParkBYAyala-HurtadoE (2017) Trump’s electoral speeches and his appeal to the American white working class. British Journal of Sociology68: S153–S180.
35.
LesterSManakI (2018) The rise of populist nationalism and the renegotiation of NAFTA. Journal of International Economic Law21: 151–169.
36.
LockwoodM (2018) Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics27(4): 712–732.
37.
MadanipourA (ed.) (2015) Planning Theory, Volume 4: Planning with Contingency (Critical Concepts in Built Environment). London: Routledge.
38.
MäntysaloRBäcklundP (2018) The governance of planning: Flexibly networked, yet institutionally grounded. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 237–249.
39.
MavrozacharakisEKotroyannosDTzagkarakisSI (2017) Mediterranean left-wing populism: The case of SYRIZA. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities6(2): 40–54.
40.
MetzgerJ (2018) Postpolitics and planning. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 180–193.
41.
MoroniS (2018) The public interest. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 69–80.
42.
MouffeC (2013) Chantal Mouffe: Hegemony, Radical Democracy, and the Political (ed. MartinJ). London: Routledge.
43.
MuddeCKaltwasserCR (2015) Populism. In: FreedenMSargentLTStearsM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 493–512.
44.
MüllerJ-W (2016) What Is Populism?Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
45.
O’SullivanJPóczaK (eds) (2015) The Second Term of Viktor Orbán: Beyond Prejudice and Enthusiasm. London: BL Nonprofit Kft (Budapest) and Social Affairs Unit (London) in association with the Danube Institute.
46.
PløgerJ (2018) Conflict and agonism. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 264–275.
47.
Rhodes-PurdyM (2015) Participatory populism: Theory and evidence from Bolivarian Venezuela. Political Research Quarterly68(3): 415–427.
48.
RiveroJJ (2017) Making post-truth planning great again: Confronting alternative facts in a fractured democracy. Planning Theory & Practice18(3): 490–493.
49.
RooduijnMAkkermanT (2017) Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics23(3): 193–204.
50.
RoyA (2012) Urban informality: The production of space and practice of planning. In: WeberRCraneR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. New York: Oxford University Press, 691–705.
51.
SagerT (2010) Role conflict: Planners torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities. In: HillierJHealeyP (eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate, 183–213.
52.
SagerT (2018) Communicative planning. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 93–104.
53.
SmithJ (2017) Local responses to right-wing populism: Building human rights cities. Studies in Social Justice11(2): 347–368.
54.
SmithN (2015) New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as a global urban strategy. In: MadanipourA (ed.) Planning Theory, Volume 4: Planning with Contingency (Critical Concepts in Built Environment). London: Routledge, 76–98.
55.
SongY (2012) Suburban sprawl and ‘smart growth’. In: WeberRCraneR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. New York: Oxford University Press, 418–435.
56.
StanleyB (2008) The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies13: 95–100.
57.
StokerG (2019) Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism?Policy & Politics47(1): 3–18.
58.
TaggartP (2000) Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Trapenberg FrickK (2013) The actions of discontent: Tea Party and property rights activists pushing back against regional planning. Journal of the American Planning Association79(3): 190–200.
61.
Trapenberg FrickK (2016) Citizen activism, conservative views and mega planning in a digital era. Planning Theory & Practice17: 193–118.
62.
Trapenberg FrickKWeinzimmerDWaddellP (2015) The politics of sustainable development opposition: State legislative efforts to stop the United Nation’s Agenda 21 in the United States. Urban Studies52(2): 209–232.
63.
TrumpDJ (2015) Great Again: How to Fix Our Crippled America. New York: Threshold Editions.
64.
UitermarkJDuyvendakJW (2008) Civilising the city: Populism and revanchist urbanism in Rotterdam. Urban Studies45(7): 1485–1503.
65.
UmemotoKZambonelliV (2012) Cultural diversity. In: WeberRCraneR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. New York: Oxford University Press, 197–207.
66.
WeberRCraneR (eds) (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. New York: Oxford University Press.
67.
WildersG (2012) Marked for Death: Islam’s War against the West and Me. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.
68.
WolkensteinF (2015) What can we hold against populism?Philosophy and Social Criticism41(2): 111–129.
69.
ZasloveA (2008) Exclusion, community, and a populist political economy: The radical right as an anti-globalization movement. Comparative European Politics6(2): 169–189.
