The post-political literature – which equates ‘the political’ with insurgencies directed against the state – has only limited relevance for planning, focused as it is on the ways in which conflict is displaced from the functioning of the state apparatus. The post-political literature has however neglected a significant change in Alain Badiou’s conceptualisation of the relation between the political and the state: the introduction of a political subject which acts from the within the state – what he calls the state revolutionary. This figure, which makes ‘evental’ planning possible, is fleshed out through a Saint-Simonian reading of Haussmann’s planning practice in his first years as Prefect of the Seine.
AgulhonMChoayF (1983) La Ville de l’Age Industriel: le Cycle Haussmannien. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
2.
PaccoudA (2016) Planning law, power, and practice: Haussmann in Paris (1853–1870). Planning Perspectives31(3): 341–361.
3.
BadiouA (2005) In Being and Event. London: Continuum.
4.
BadiouA (2009) Logics of Worlds: Being and Event II (trans. ToscanoA). London: Continuum.
5.
BadiouA (2011) Épilogue. In: RabouinDFelthamOLincolnL (eds) Autour de Logiques des Mondes. Paris: Édition des Archives Contemporaines, 173–179.
6.
BadiouA (2017) Le Séminaire (2010–2012): Que Signifie ‘Changer le Monde?’. Paris: Éditions Fayard.
7.
BadiouALancelinA (2017) Éloge de la Politique. Paris: Groupe Flammarion.
8.
BadiouAMilnerJC (2012) Controverses: Dialogue sur la Politique et la Philosophie de Notre Temps (Interviewed P Petit) Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
9.
BassettK (2016) Event, politics, and space: Rancière or Badiou?Space and Polity20(3): 280–293.
10.
BenevoloL (1967) The Origins of Modern Town Planning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
11.
BenjaminW (2002) The Arcades Project (trans. EilandHMclaughlinK). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BeveridgeRKochP (2017) The post-political trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city. Urban Studies54(1): 31–43.
13.
BondS (2011) Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’: Moving beyond the agonistic – Communicative divide. Planning Theory10(2): 161–186.
14.
BourillonF (1996) Rénovation ‘Haussmannienne’ et ségrégation urbaine. In: FourcautA (ed.) La Ville Divisée: les Ségrégations Urbaines en Question France XVIIIe-XXe Siècles. Grane: Créaphis, 91–104.
15.
BowieK (2001) La Modernité avant Haussmann: Formes de l’Espace Urbain à Paris 1801–1853. Paris: Éditions Recherche.
ChoayF (1996) La Règle et le Modèle: sur la Théorie de l’Architecture et de l’Urbanisme. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
18.
DikeçM (2005) Space, politics, and the political. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23(2): 171–188.
19.
DikeçMSwyngedouwE (2017) Theorizing the politicizing city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research41(1): 1–18.
20.
EngelsF (1942) The Housing Question. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
21.
ForesterJ (1984) Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through. Public Administration Review44(1): 23–31.
22.
ForesterJ (1987) Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation. Journal of the American Planning Association53(3): 303–314.
23.
ForesterJ (2012) On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations. Planning Theory12(1): 5–22.
24.
GaillardJ (2000) Paris La Ville: 1852–1870. Paris: L’Harmattan.
25.
GiedionS (1943) Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
GrangeJMussoPRegnierP, et al. (2013) Henri de Saint-Simon, Œuvres Complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
27.
HallP (1998) Cities in Civilization: Culture Innovation and Urban Order. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
28.
HannahMG (2016) State knowledge and recurring patterns of state phobia: From fascism to post-politics. Progress in Human Geography40(4): 476–494.
29.
HarveyD (2006) Paris, Capital of Modernity. London: Routledge.
30.
HillierJ (2003) ‘Agon’izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘Real’. Planning Theory2(1): 37–59.
31.
KiernanMJ (1983) Ideology, politics, and planning: Reflections on the theory and practice of urban planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design10(1): 71–87.
32.
LazarusS (1996) Anthropologie du Nom. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
33.
LefebvreH (2000) Espace et Politique: Le Droit à la Ville II. Paris: Economica.
34.
LegacyC (2016) Transforming transport planning in the postpolitical era. Urban Studies53(14): 3108–3124.
35.
LoyerF (1987) Paris XIXe Siècle: L’immeuble et la Rue. Paris: Hazan.
36.
MarchartO (2011) Democracy and minimal politics: The political difference and its consequences. South Atlantic Quarterly110(4): 965–973.
37.
MarxK (1933) The Civil War in France. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
38.
MerrifieldA (2014) The New Urban Question. London: Pluto Press.
39.
MetzgerJ (2017) Postpolitics and planning. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 180–193.
40.
MouffeC (2009) The importance of engaging the state. In: PughJ (ed.) What is Radical Politics Today?London: Palgrave Macmillan, 230–237.
41.
MouffeC (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso Books.
42.
OosterlynckSSwyngedouwE (2010) Noise reduction: The postpolitical quandary of night flights at Brussels airport. Environment and Planning A42: 1577–1594.
43.
PapayanisN (2004) Planning Paris before Haussmann. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
44.
PikettyTPostel-VinayGRosenthalJL (2006) Wealth concentration in a developing economy: Paris and France, 1807–1994. American Economic Review96(1): 236–256.
45.
PinheiroEP (2002) Europa, França e Bahia: Difusão e Adaptação de Modelos Urbanos. Bahia, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Bahia.
46.
PløgerJ (2004) Strife: Urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory3(1): 71–92.
47.
RancièreJ (1991) The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation (trans. RossK). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
RoncayoloM (1983) La production de la ville. In: AgulhonMChoayF (eds) La Ville de l’Age Industriel: le Cycle Haussmannien. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 91–125.
49.
Saint-SimonCH (1819a) Réponses directes à l’idée capital contenue dans la proposition de M. Barthelemy. In: Le Politique 8e Livraison. Paris: Corréard, 261–273.
50.
Saint-SimonCH (1819b) Le Parti national ou industriel comparé au parti anti-national. In: Le Politique 10e Livraison. Paris: Corréard, 353–367.
51.
Saint-SimonCH (1821) Du Système Industriel. Paris: Renouard.
52.
Saint-SimonCH (1823–1824) Catéchisme des Industriels. Paris: Sétier.
53.
Saint-SimonCH (1825) Nouveau Christianisme: Dialogues entre un Conservateur et un Novateur. Paris: Bossange.
54.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
ShawIGR (2010) Sites, truths and the logics of worlds: Alain Badiou and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35(3): 431–442.
56.
SmithN (1996) The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.
57.
SutcliffeA (1981) Towards the Planned City: Germany Britain the United States and France 1780–1914. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
58.
SwyngedouwE (2011) Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography30(7): 370–380.
59.
SwyngedouwE (2014) Where is the political? Insurgent mobilisations and the incipient ‘return of the political’. Space and Polity18(2): 122–136.
60.
SwyngedouwE (2017) Unlocking the mind-trap: Politicising urban theory and practice. Urban Studies54(1): 55–61.
61.
Van PuymbroeckNOosterlynckS (2014) Opening up the post-political condition: Multiculturalism and the matrix of depoliticisation. In: SwyngedouwEWilsonJ (eds) The Post-political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticization, Spectres of Radical Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 86–108.
