It is often suggested that a defining feature of planning is its interventionist nature which requires connecting knowledge to action. With the upsurge of evidence-based planning, much is rehearsed about the utilitarian necessity of making such connection. What is less widely discussed is the epistemological nuances and challenges of knowledge–action relationship. This essay aims to contribute to the latter by conceptualising planning as practice of knowing. This is to shift the focus from knowledge as something that planners have to knowing as something that planners do. I would argue that, rather than thinking about knowledge as having an instrumental place in planning, it is more useful to think about planning as practice of knowing that involves knowing what, knowing how, knowing to what end and doing. Seen in this way, practice of knowing is a dynamic process that is situated and provisional, collective and distributed, purposive and pragmatic, and mediated and contested.
AudiR (1996) ( ed.) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BastowSDunleavyPTinklerJ (2014) Impact of the Social Sciences, How Academics and Their Research Make a Difference. London: SAGE.
3.
BeinerR (1983) Political Judgment. London: Methuen.
4.
BernsteinR (1983) Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics and Praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
BevirM (2013) A Theory of Governance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BlacklerF (1995) Knowledge, Knowledge work and organisation: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies16(6): 1021–1046.
7.
Cabinet Office (1999) Professional Policy Making for the 21st Century. London: Cabinet Office.
8.
CampbellH (2006) Just planning: The art of situated ethical judgment. Journal of Planning Education and Research26(1): 92–106.
9.
CampbellH (2012) Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research32(2): 133–134.
10.
CooperD (1999) Epistemology: The Classic Readings. London: Blackwell.
11.
DaviesHTONutleySMSmithPC (1999) Editorial: What works? The role of evidence in public sector policy and practice. Public Money & Management19(1): 3–5.
12.
DavoudiS (2006) Evidence-based planning: Rhetoric and reality. disP: The Planning Review165(2): 14–25.
13.
DavoudiS (2012) The legacy of positivism and the emergence of interpretive tradition in spatial planning. Regional Studies46(4): 429–441.
14.
DavoudiS (2015) Research impact: Should the sky be the limit? In: SilvaEHealeyPHarrisN, et al. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Research Methods. London: Routledge, 405–413.
15.
DavoudiSCrawfordJDilleyL (2014) Energy consumption behaviour, rational or habitual?disP: The Planning Review50(3): 11–19.
16.
DavoudiSHarperGPettsJ, et al. (2015) Judging research quality to support evidence-informed environmental policy. Environmental Evidence4: 9.
17.
DavyB (2008) Plan it without a condom!Planning Theory7(3): 301–317.
18.
disP (2006) Special issue: Evidence-based planning. disP: The Planning Review165(2): 3–72.
19.
DreyfusHLRabinowP (1983) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
FayB (1996) Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science, A Multicultural Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
21.
FischlerR (1995) Strategy and history in professional planning, planning as world making. In: LiggettHPerryD (eds) Spatial Practices. London: SAGE, pp. 13–59.
22.
FlynnT (1994) Foucault’s mapping of history. In: GuttingG (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 28–47.
23.
FlyvbjergB (2001) Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
ForesterJ (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner; Encouraging Participative Planning Processes. London: MIT Press
25.
ForesterJ (2012) On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations. Planning Theory12(1): 5–22.
26.
FoucaultM (1978) The History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction (trans. HurtleyR). New York: Pantheon Books.
27.
FoucaultM (1980a) l’ Impossible Prison [The Impossible Prison]. Manuscript of a roundtable discussion, 20May1978 (ed PerrotM), Paris: Le Seuil.
28.
FoucaultM (1980b) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writing, 1972-1977 (ed GordonC). New York: Pantheon.
29.
FoucaultM (1982) The subject and power. In: DreyfusHLRabinowP (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 208–226.
30.
FoucaultM (1991) Questions of method. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 73–86.
31.
FoucaultMDeleuzeG (1990) Intellectuals and power. In: FergusonROlanderWTuckerM, et al. (eds) Discourses: Conversations in Postmodern Art and Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 9–16.
32.
FreemanR (2007) Epistemological bricolage: How practitioners make sense of learning. Administration and Society39(4): 476–496.
33.
FriedmannJ (1987) Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
GilbertN (2008) (ed.) Researching Social Life. London: SAGE.
35.
GuignonCB (1991) Pragmatism or hermeneutics? Epistemology after foundationalism. In: HileyDRBohmanJShustermanR (eds) The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. New York: Cornell University Press, 81–102.
36.
GunderM (2010) Fake it until you make it, and then … Planning Theory10(3): 201–212.
37.
HealeyP (2009) The pragmatic tradition in planning thought. Journal of Planning Education and Research28(3): 277–292.
38.
HochC (1994) What Planners Do. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.
HollisM (1994) The Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
IrwinA (2001) Sociology and the Environment. Cambridge: Polity Press.
42.
JamesW (1950) The Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover Publications.
43.
JasanoffS (2003) Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on H.M. Collins and Robert Evans. ‘The Third Wace of Science Studies’. Social Studies of Science33(3): 389–400.
44.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
45.
LatourBWoolgarS (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: SAGE.
46.
LaveJ (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
LaveJ (1993) The practice of learning. In: ChaiklinSLaveJ (eds) Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–34.
48.
LawJ (1992) Notes on the theory of actor-network ordering, strategy and homogeneity. Systems Practice5: 375–394.
49.
Levi StraussC (1966) The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
50.
LindblomCE (1959) The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Administration Review19: 79–88.
51.
LindblomCECohenD (1979) Unusable Knowledge: Social Sciences and Social Problem Solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
52.
Office of the deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2004) Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Development Frameworks. London: ODPM.
53.
OrrJ (1990) Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: Community memory in a service culture. In: MiddletonDEdwardsD (eds) Collecting Remembering. London: SAGE, 169–189.
RothPA (1991) Interpretation as explanation. In: HileyDRBohmanJShustermanR (eds) The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. New York: Cornell University Press, 179–197.
56.
RouseJ (1994) Power/knowledge. In: GuttingG (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92–115.
57.
RydinY (2007) Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory6(1): 52–68.
58.
SchonD (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
59.
SchumanL (1987) Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
ScrutonR (1996) Modern Philosophy: An Introduction and Survey. London: Mandarin Non-fiction.
61.
SmithAFM (1996) Mad cows and ecstasy: Chance and choice in an evidence-based society. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A159(3): 367–383.
62.
StarS (1992) The trojan door: Organizations, work, and the ‘open black box’. Systems Practice5: 395–410.
63.
StraussAL (1993) Continual Permutation of Action. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction publishers.
64.
UngarR (1987) False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
WagenaarH (2004) ‘Knowing’ the rules: Administrative work as practice. Public Administration Review64(6): 643–655.
66.
WagenaarH (2011) Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. London: M.E. Sharpe.
67.
WagenaarHNoam CookSD (2003) Understanding policy practice: Action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis. In: HajerMWagenaarH (eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–171.
68.
WengerE (1998) Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
WrongDH (1988) Power: Its Forms, Bases, and Uses. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
70.
YoungKAshbyDBoazA. (2002) Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society1(3): 215–224.
71.
ZuboffS (1988) In the Age of Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books.
