Planning has struggled with its identity as a profession. This has made planning systems vulnerable in the face of attacks on their utility. Sue Hendler was a passionate advocate of planning and its claims to professional status. Building on her writing, I argue that planning’s claims to professional status and expertise have validity. Judged against other professions, planners’ claims are of equal status, grounded as they are in the generation and melding of knowledge and knowledge claims and in the exercising of non-routinised judgement in issues pertaining to place and space. Planning practice and education needs to recognise this reality more explicitly.
AbramS (2004) Personality and professionalism in a Norwegian district council. Planning Theory3: 21–40.
2.
AminARobertsJ (2008) Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy37: 353–369.
3.
BickenbachJHendlerS (1994) The moral mandate of the planning profession. In: ThomasH (ed.) Values and Planning. Aldershot: Avebury.
4.
CampbellH (2006) Just planning: The art of situated ethical judgement. Journal of Planning Education and Research26: 92–106.
5.
CampbellHMarshallR (2005) Professionalism and Planning in Britain. Town Planning Review76(2): 191–214.
6.
ChettiparambA (2006) Bottom-up planning and the future of planning education in India. Journal of Planning Education and Research26(2): 185–194.
7.
ClarkeJNewmanJ (1997) The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage.
8.
ConnellDJ (2009) Planning and its orientation to the future. International Planning Studies14(1): 85–99.
9.
CowellR (forthcoming) Planning politics and sustainability: Assessing the planning reforms of the May (2010) Coalition government. Planning Practice and Research.
DavoudiSPendleburyJ (2010) Evolution of planning as an academic discipline. Town Planning Review81(6): 613–644.
12.
DavoudiSStrangeI (eds) (2009) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Planning. London: Routledge.
13.
DurningBCarpenterJGlassonJButina WatsonG (2010) The spiral of knowledge development: Professional knowledge development in planning. Planning Practice and Research25(4): 497–516.
14.
EvansB (1993) Why we no longer need a town planning profession. Planning Practice and Research8(1): 9–16.
15.
FlyvbjergB (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
ForesterJ (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
ForesterJ (1991) Political judgement and learning about value in transportation planning: Bridging Habermas and Aristotle. In: ThomasH (ed.) Values in Planning. Ashgate: Avebury.
18.
FriedmannJM (1998) Planning theory revisited. European Planning Studies6: 245–150.
19.
FriedmannJ (1987) Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
FriedsonE (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
FysonA (2008) Fyson on. . .whether public sector defection represents job dissatisfaction. Planning27June2008.
23.
GherardiS (2006) Organisational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
GibsonE (2000) Perceptual Learning in development: Some basic concepts. Ecological Psychology12(4): 295–302.
25.
GoodstadtV (2007) Strategic planning in the Glasgow metropolitan region. In: DimitriouHThomsonR (eds) Strategic Planning for Regional Development in the UK : A Review of Principles and Practices. London: Routledge.
26.
GunnSVigarG (2012) Planners as Box-Tickers, Ringmasters or Evangelists? Reform processes and professional discretionary space in English planning practice. Town Planning Review83(5): xxx–xxx.
27.
GunnSHillierJ (2010) The reforming of the English planning system: A story of risk not uncertainty and the impact this had on planning creativity. Paper presented at New Partnerships on the Horizon? Governing Uncertainty, Accountability and Public Participation, International Workshop, Brussels, Belgium, 9 February 2010.
28.
HaasP (1992) Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1): 1–37.
29.
HarrisThomasH (2009) Making Wales: Spatial strategy-making in a devolved context. In: DavoudiSStrangeIConceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. London: Routledge.
30.
HealeyP (2009) In search of the strategic in spatial strategy-making. Planning Theory and Practice10(4): 439–457.
31.
HealeyP (1992) A planner’s day: Knowledge and action in communicative practice. Journal of the American Planning Association58(1): 9–20.
32.
HealeyP (1985) The professionalization of planning in Britain. Town Planning Review56 (4): 492–507.
33.
HealeyPThomasH (1991) Dilemmas of Planning Practice. Aldershot: Avebury.
34.
HealyA (2009) Ethics and consultancy. In: LoPiccoloFThomasH (eds) Ethics and Planning Research. Aldershot: Avebury.
35.
HendlerS (2005) Towards a feminist code of planning ethics. Planning Theory and Practice6(1): 53–69.
36.
HendlerS (1995) Introduction. In: HendlerS (ed.) Planning and Ethics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
37.
HendlerS (1991) Do professional codes legitimate planners’ values? In: ThomasHHealeyP (eds) Dilemmas of Planning Practice. Aldershot: Avebury.
38.
HeylighenA (2011) Designerly ways of not knowing. Paper presented at SPINDUS Conference, Leuven, Belgium, 30 January 2011.
39.
HillierJ (2002) Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning, London: Routledge.
40.
HirschmanAO (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. London: Harvard University Press.
41.
HoggettPMayoMMillerC (2009) Dilemmas of Development Work. Bristol: Policy Press.
42.
InchA (2010) Culture change as identity regulation: The micro-politics of producing spatial planners in England. Planning Theory and Practice. 11(3): 359–374.
43.
JamousHPeloilleB (1970) Changes in the French university hospital system. In: JacksonJAProfessions and Professionalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
JohnsonT (1972) Professions and Power. London, Macmillan.
45.
KitchenT (2007) Skills for Planning Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
KoehnD (1994) The Ground of Professional Ethics. London: Routledge.
47.
LaffinMEntwistleT (2000) New problems, old professions? The changing national world of the local government professions. Policy and Politics28(2): 207–220.
48.
LipskyM (1980) Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
MacDonaldKM (1995) The Sociology of the Professions. London: Sage.
51.
MarchA (2007) Institutional impediments to planning professionalism in Victoria, Australia. International Planning Studies12(4): 367–389.
52.
MillerC (2011) Planners and the consequences of change: Dilemmas and challenges. Australian Planner48(3): 183–191.
53.
NewmanJ (2004) Constructing accountability: Network governance and managerial agency. Public Policy and Administration19(4): 17–33.
54.
O’NeilO (2002) A Question of Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
OwensS (1994) Land, limits and sustainability: A conceptual framework and some dilemmas for the planning system. Transactions19: 439–456.
56.
OwensSCowellR (2011) Land and Limits (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
57.
ReadeE (1987) British Town and Country Planning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
58.
RTPI (2007) Shaping and delivering tomorrow’s places. London: Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI).
59.
RydinY (2007) Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory, Planning Theory6(1): 52–68.
60.
SchonD (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
61.
SchonD (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Aldershot: Ashgate.
62.
SquiresG (2005) Art, science and the professions. Studies in Higher Education30(2): 127–136.
63.
SteeleW (2009) Australian urban planners: Hybrid roles and professional dilemmas?Urban Policy and Research27(2): 191–205.
64.
SunleyPPinchSReimerSM (2011) Design capital: Practice and situated learning in London design agencies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers36(3): 377–392.
65.
Tewdwr-JonesMAllmendingerP (1998) Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and Planning A30(11): 1975–1989.
66.
ThomasH (1999) Planning and the planning profession. In: GreedC (ed.) Social Town Planning. London: Routledge, 15–28.
67.
WengerE (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
