The Lacanian perspective argues that planning, in its discourses and practices, is
inherently ideological and the visions and ideals shaping the fantasies of the
future city are often reflective of the homogenic desires of conflicting, but
dominant, privileged minorities. Here the democratic process fails because the
issues of contention are pre-shaped and ‘technically’ determined
and the rationality deployed only allows a limited range of
‘sensible’, i.e. pre-framed, dreams of what constitutes the
‘good’ city. This article draws on both Lacan and Lefebvre to
explore the dichotomy between seeking a common harmony of social vision while at the
same time avoiding any exclusion of cultural and related difference in lived space.
Allmendinger, P.
(2003)
‘Rescaling, Integration and Competition: Future Challenges for
Development Planning’
, International Planning Studies8(4):
323-328
.
2.
Allmendinger, P.
and
Gunder, M.
(2005)
‘Applying Lacanian Insight and a Dash of Derridean Deconstruction
to Planning’s “Dark Side”’
, Planning Theory4(1):
87-112
.
3.
Auckland Regional Growth Forum
(1999) Auckland Regional Growth Strategy: 2050.
Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Regional Council
.
4.
Benko, G.
and
Strohmayer, U.
(1997) Space and Social Theory.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
5.
Blum, V.
and
Nast, H.
(1996)
‘Where’s the Difference? The Heterosexualization of
Alternity in Henri Lefebvre and Jacques Lacan’
, Environment and Planning D14(4):
559-580
.
6.
Blum, V.
and
Nast, H.
(2000) ‘Jacques Lacan’s
Two-dimensional Subjectivity’, in
M. Crang
and
N. Thrift
(eds) Thinking Space, pp. 183-204.
London: Routledge
.
7.
Bracher, M.
(1993) Lacan, Discourse, and Social Change.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
8.
Brenner, N.
(2000)
‘The Urban Question as a Scale Question: Reflections on Henri
Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of Scale’
, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(2):
361-378
.
9.
Burkitt, I.
(2002)
‘Technologies of the Self: Habitus and Capacities’
, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour32(2):
219-237
.
10.
Chomsky, N.
(2003) Understanding Power.
London: Vintage
.
11.
Dean, J.
(2001)
‘Publicity’s Secret’
, Political Theory29(5):
624-650
.
12.
Dear, M.
(1997) ‘Postmodern
Bloodlines’, in
G. Benko
and
U. Strohmayer
(eds) Space and Social Theory, pp. 49-71.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
13.
Dor, J.
(1998) Introduction to the Reading of Lacan.
New York: Other Press
.
14.
Eagleton, T.
(2003) After Theory.
New York: Basic Books
.
15.
Elden, S.
(2004) Understanding Henri Lefebvre.
London: Continuum
.
16.
Fink, B.
(1995) The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and
Jouissance.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
17.
Fink, B.
(2004) Lacan to the Letter.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
.
18.
Flyvbjerg, B.
(1998a) Rationality and Power.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
19.
Flyvbjerg, B.
(1998b)
‘Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society?’
, British Journal of Sociology49(2):
210-233
.
20.
Friedmann, J.
(2002) The Prospect of Cities.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
.
21.
Goonewardena, K.
and
Rankin, K.
(2004)
‘The Desire Called Civil Society: A Contribution to the Critique
of a Bourgeois Category’
, Planning Theory3(2):
117-149
.
22.
Gunder, M.
(2003a)
‘Passionate Planning for the Others’ Desire: An
Agonistic Response to the Dark Side of Planning’
, Progress in Planning60(3):
235-319
.
23.
Gunder, M.
(2003b)
‘Planning Policy Formulation from a Lacanian Perspective’
, International Planning Studies8(4):
279-294
.
24.
Gunder, M.
(2004)
‘Shaping the Planner’s Ego-Ideal: A Lacanian
Interpretation of Planning Education’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research23(3):
299-311
.
25.
Gunder, M.
(2005, in press)
‘Obscuring Difference Through Shaping Debate: A Lacanian View of
Planning for Diversity’
, International Planning Studies.
26.
Gunder, M.
and
Hillier, J.
(2004)
‘Conforming to the Expectations of the Profession: A Lacanian
Perspective on Planning Practice, Norms and Values’
, Planning Theory and Practice5(2):
217-235
.
27.
Gunder, M.
and
Mouat, C.
(2002)
‘Symbolic Violence and Victimisation in Planning Processes: A
Reconnoitre of the New Zealand Resource Management Act’
, Planning Theory1(2):
125-146
.
28.
Habermas, J.
(1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society.
London: Heinemann
.
29.
Hansen, A.
,
Andersen, H.
and
Clark, E.
(2001)
‘Creative Copenhagen: Globalization, Urban Governance and Social Change’
, European Planning Studies9(7):
851-869
.
30.
Hillier, J.
(2002) Shadows of Power.
London: Routledge
.
31.
Hillier, J.
(2003)
‘Agon’izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals
Cannot be “Real”’
, Planning Theory2(1):
37-59
.
32.
Hillier, J.
and
Gunder, M.
(2003)
‘Planning Fantasies? An Exploration of a Potential Lacanian
Framework for Understanding Development Assessment Planning’
, Planning Theory2(3):
225-248
.
33.
Hillier, J.
and
Gunder, M.
(2005, in press)
‘Not Over Your Dead Bodies!: A Lacanian Interpretation of
Planning Discourse and Practice’
, Environment and Planning A.
34.
Hoch, C.
(1994) What Planners Do: Power, Politics and
Persuasion.
Chicago, IL: Planners Press
.
35.
Howe, J.
and
Langdon, C.
(2002)
‘Towards a Reflexive Planning Theory’
, Planning Theory1(3):
209-225
.
36.
Jameson, F.
(2003) ‘Imaginary and Symbolic in Lacan:
Marxism, Psychoanalytic Criticism, and the Problem of the
Subject’, in
S. Žižek
(ed.) Jacques Lacan: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory,
Volume III, pp. 3-43.
London: Routledge
.
37.
Jessop, B.
(1998)
‘The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure: The Case of
Economic Development’
, International Social Science Journal155:
29-45
.
38.
Jessop, B.
(2000)
‘The Crisis of the National Spatio-Temporal Fix and the
Tendential Ecological Dominance of Globalizing Capitalism’
, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(2):
323-360
.
39.
Kay, S.
(2003) Žižek: A Critical
Introduction.
Cambridge: Polity
.
40.
Krips, H.
(2003) ‘Extract from Fetish: An Erotics of
Culture’, in
S. Žižek
(ed.) Jacques Lacan: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory,
Volume III, pp. 143-184.
London: Routledge
.
41.
Lacan, J.
(1988a) The Seminar, Book I, 1953-1954.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
42.
Lacan, J.
(1988b) The Seminar, Book II, 1954-1955.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
43.
Lacan, J.
(1989)
‘Science and Truth’
, Newsletter of the Freudian Field3(1-2):
4-29
.
44.
Lacan, J.
(1992) The Ethics of Psychoanalysis.
London: Routledge
.
45.
Lacan, J.
(1994) The Four Fundamental Concepts of
Psycho-analysis.
Penguin: London
.
46.
Lacan, J.
(1998) The Seminar, Book XX, 1972-1973.
New York: Norton
.
47.
Lacan, J.
(2002) Ecrits.
London: Norton
.
48.
Lacan, J.
(2004) ‘The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII,
The Other Side of Psychoanalysis: 1969-1970’, unpublished
manuscript translation by Russell Grigg, translator’s photocopy.
49.
Laclau, E.
(1996) Emancipation(s).
London: Verso
.
50.
Laclau, E.
and
Mouffe, C.
(1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy.
London: Verso
.
51.
Lefebvre, H.
(1991) The Production of Space.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
52.
Lefebvre, H.
(1996) Writings on Cities.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
53.
Lefebvre, H.
(2003) The Urban Revolution.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
.
54.
Loose, R.
(2002) ‘A Lacanian Approach to Clinical
Diagnosis and Addiction’, in
J. Glynos
and
Y. Stavrakakis
(eds) Lacan and Science, pp. 263-289.
London: Karnac
.
55.
McCann, E.
(2000)
‘Race, Protest, and Public Space: Contextualizing Lefebvre in the
US City’
, Antipode32:
21-37
.
56.
McGowan, T.
(2004) The End of Dissatisfaction?Albany: SUNY
.
57.
McGuirk, P.
(2004)
‘State, Strategy, and Scale in the Competitive City: A
Neo-Gramscian Analysis of the Governance of “Global Sydney”’
, Environment and Planning A36(6):
1019-1043
.
58.
Merrifield, A.
(2000) ‘Henri Lefebvre: A Socialist in
Space’, in
M. Crang
and
N. Thrift
(eds) Thinking Space, pp. 167-182.
London: Routledge
.
59.
Miraftab, F.
(2004)
‘Public-Private Partnerships: The Trojan Horse of Neoliberal Development’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research24(1):
89-101
.
60.
Morel, G.
(2000)
‘Science and Psychoanalysis’
, Umbra(a): A Journal of the Unconscious - Science and Truth:
65-79
.
61.
Mouffe, C.
(1999)
‘Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism’
, Social Research66(3):
745-758
.
62.
Mouffe, C.
(2000) The Democratic Paradox.
London: Verso
.
63.
Newman, S.
(2001) From Bakunin to Lacan.
Oxford: Lexington Books
.
64.
Pløger, J.
(2004)
‘Strife: Urban Planning and Agonism’
, Planning Theory3(1):
71-92
.
65.
Roudinesco, E.
(1997) Jacques Lacan.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
66.
Sandercock, L.
(2003) Cosmopolis II.
London: Continuum
.
67.
Sandercock, L.
(2004)
‘Towards a Planning Imagination for the 21st Century’
, Journal of the American Planning Association70(2):
133-141
.
68.
Soja, E.
(1989) Postmodern Geographies.
London: Verso
.
69.
Stahre, U.
(2004)
‘City in Change: Globalization, Local Politics and Urban
Movements in Contemporary Stockholm’
, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(1):
68-85
.
70.
Stavrakakis, Y.
(1999) Lacan and the Political.
London: Routledge
.
71.
Stavrakakis, Y.
(2003a)
‘Re-Activating the Democratic Revolution: The Politics of
Transformation Beyond Reoccupation and Conformism’
, Parallax9(2):
56-71
.
72.
Stavrakakis, Y.
(2003b) ‘Laclau with Lacan: Comments on the
Relationship of Discourse Theory and Lacanian
Psychoanalysis’, in
S. Žižek
(ed.) Jacques Lacan: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory,
Volume III, pp. 314-337.
London: Routledge
.
73.
Thrift, N.
(2004a)
‘Remembering the Technological Unconscious by Foregrounding
Knowledges of Position’
, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(1):
175-190
.
74.
Thrift, N.
(2004b)
‘Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect’
, Geografiska Annaler86B(1):
57-78
.
75.
Verhaeghe, P.
(2002) ‘Causality in Science and
Psychoanalysis’, in
J. Glynos
and
Y. Stavrakakis
(eds) Lacan and Science, pp. 119-145.
London: Karnac
.
76.
Yiftachel, O.
(1998)
‘Planning and Social Control: Exploring the Dark Side’
, Journal of Planning Literature12(4):
395-406
.
77.
Yiftachel, O.
(2002) ‘The Dark Side of Modernism: Planning as
Control of an Ethnic Minority’, in
G. Bridge
and
S. Watson
(eds) The Blackwell City Reader, pp.
535-541.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
78.
Ziarek, E.
(2001) An Ethics of Dissensus.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
79.
Žižek, S.
(1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology.
London: Verso
.
80.
Žižek, S.
(1993) Tarrying with the Negative.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
.
81.
Žižek, S.
(1997) The Plague of Fantasies.
London: Verso
.
82.
Žižek, S.
(1999a) The Ticklish Subject.
London: Verso
.
83.
Žižek, S.
(1999b) The Žižek Reader.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
84.
Žižek, S.
(2001) Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism?London: Verso
.
85.
Žižek, S.
(2002a) Welcome to the Desert of the Real.
London: Verso
.
86.
Žižek, S.
(2002b) Revolution at the Gates.
London: Verso
.
87.
Žižek, S.
(2004a) Organs without Bodies.
London: Routledge
.
88.
Žižek, S.
(2004b) Iraq: The Borrowed Kettle.
London: Verso
.
89.
Žižek, S.
and
Daly, G.
(2004) Conversations with Žižek.
Cambridge: Polity
.
90.
Zupancic, A.
(1998) ‘The Subject of the
Law’, in
S. Žižek
(ed.) Cognito and the Unconscious, pp.
41-73.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
.
91.
Zupancic, A.
(2000) Ethics of the Real.
London: Verso
.
92.
Zupancic, A.
(2003) The Shortest Shadow: Nietzsche’s Philosophy
of the Two.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
93.
Zupancic, A.
(2004)
‘Four Discourses in the Light of Surplus-Enjoyment’
, paper presented at The Other Side of Psychoanalysis: Conference
on Jacques Lacan’s Seminar XVII, Deakin University
and the Lacanian Circle of Melbourne Australia, 3-4 July.
