Despite feminism’s contributions to planning theory and practice, it seems to be disappearing from the planning discourse. Drawing on the history of the feminist movement, experiences in the classroom, a scan of recent planning papers and publications, including some on planning curricula and women’s prospects within the profession in Canada and the USA, questions are raised about the reasons for this apparent decline. The authors ask if postmodernism is undermining the feminist and anti-racism movements by combining complex and intersecting identities into an amorphous notion of diversity, rather than explicating the differential relations of power embodied in these differences.
Allen, P.G. (1992) The Sacred Hoop: Recovering the Feminine in American Indian Traditions. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
2.
American Planning Association (1997) ‘Parity? Unfortunately Not Yet. APA Releases the 1995 Salary Survey’, PW Exchange (Winter).
3.
Bannerji, H. (2000) ‘The Paradox of Diversity: The Construction of a Multiracial Canada and “Women of Color” ’, Women Studies International Forum23(3): 537-560.
4.
Cook, A. (1993) ‘Educating Women Planners: The Role of Gender and Covert Harassment in the Training of Planners’, Working Paper No. 33, School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Waterloo.
5.
Eichler, M. (ed.) (1995) Change of Plans: Towards a Non-sexist Sustainable City. Toronto: Garamond Press.
6.
Evan, S. (2002) ‘Re-Viewing the Second Wave’, Feminist Studies28(2): 259-267.
7.
Ginzberg, L. (2002) ‘Re-Viewing the First Wave’, Feminist Studies28(2): 419-434.
8.
Greed, C. (1994) Women and Planning: Creating Gendered Realities. London: Routledge.
9.
Guererra, C. and Horner, M. (2003) ‘Feminism in Planning Education: A Review of the Integration of Feminism in Canadian Planning Programs’, unpublished report, School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario.
10.
Jacobs, J. (1998) ‘Staging Difference: Aesthetization and the Politics of Difference in Contemporary Cities’, in R. Fincher and J. Jacobs (eds) Cities of Difference. New York: Guilford.
11.
Klowdasky, F. (1985) Employment Opportunities for Women in Architecture and Urban Planning: Problems and Prospects. Ottawa: Women’s Bureau, Labour Canada.
12.
MacGregor, S. (1994) ‘Feminist Approaches to Planning Thought and Action: Practical Lessons from Women Plan Toronto’, Master’s Thesis, Department of City and Regional Planning, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
13.
Ontario Professional Planners Institute (1995) Ontario Professional Planners Institute Annual Report 1994-1995. Toronto: Ontario Professional Planners Institute.
14.
Ontario ProfessionalPlanners Institute (2003) ‘Facts and Figures on OPPI’, Ontario Planning Journal18(6): 14.
15.
Pinterics, N. (2001) ‘Riding the Feminist Waves, in with the Third?’, Canadian Woman Studies20-1 (4-1): 15-21.
16.
Rahder, B.L. and O’Neill, K. (1998) ‘Women and Planning: Education for Social Change’, Planning Practice & Research13(3): 247-265.
17.
Research Dimensions (1997) Canadian Institute of Planners Membership Survey 1996. Ottawa: Canadian Institute of Planners.
18.
Sandercock, L. (1995) ‘Voices from the Borderlands: A Mediation on a Metaphor’, Journal of Planning Education and Research14(2): 77-88.
19.
Sandercock, L. (2000) ‘Cities of (In)Difference and the Challenge for Planning’, DISP140(1): 7-15.
20.
Sandercock, L. and Forsyth, A. (1992) ‘Feminist Theory and Planning Theory: The Epistemological Linkages’, Planning Theory Newsletter7-8: 45-48.
21.
Sassen, S. (2000) Cities in a World Economy, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
22.
Snyder, M.G. (1995) ‘Feminist Theory and Planning Theory’, Berkeley Planning Journal10: 91-106.
23.
Sommer, M. and Simpson, D. (2001) ‘Status of Women in Planning: Students and Planning Practitioners’, paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning 43rd Annual Conference, Cleveland, 10 November.
24.
Spelman, E. (1988) Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
