Knowledge about connections within a local economic system holds implication for understanding the ways in which individuals and categories of entrepreneurs access the system itself and resources provided within. While scholars have recently found complex divisions of networks within local entrepreneurship ecosystems, we still have a limited understanding about why these chasms exist. We present a case study with qualitative research in the entrepreneurial ecosystem of St. Louis, Missouri, which identifies structural sources of divergence in networks. Specifically, we find a gender gap in the ecosystem that reveals patterns of difference in access to resources and in the experiences of women relative to men entrepreneurs. Thus, we contribute a more nuanced understanding of how discrete elements within a system’s networks diverge, as well as identifying the root causes of this divergence. The article concludes with implications for theories and practice.
Amex (2013) State of Women-Owned Businesses Report. New York: American Express.
2.
AmezcuaASPandeySSimaraslN (2019) Are business incubators’ ecosystems inclusive of women entrepreneurs? In: Go-to-Market Strategies for Women Entrepreneurs: Creating and Exploring Success. Bingley, UK: Emerald, pp. 57–66.
Aulet B (2013) Disciplined Entrepreneurship: 24 Steps to a Successful Startup. Wiley.
7.
BhideA (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BramwellANellsJWolfeDA (2008) Knowledge, innovation and institutions: Global and local dimensions of the ICT cluster in Waterloo, Canada. Regional Studies42(1): 101–116.
9.
BreznitzDTaylorM (2014) The communal roots of entrepreneurial – Technological growth – Social fragmentation and stagnation: Reflection on Atlanta’s technology cluster. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development26(3–4): 375–396.
10.
BrushCGEdelmanLFManolovaT, et al. (2019) A gendered look at entrepreneurship ecosystems. Small Business Economics53: 393–408.
11.
BrushCGGreenePGBalanchandraL, et al. (2014) Women Entrepreneurs 2014: Bridging the Gap in Venture Capital. Report Sponsored by Ernst and Young. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
12.
Census Bureau (2012) Survey of Business Owners. Washington, DC: Census Bureau.
13.
ChellEKarataş-ÖzkanM (2014) Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
14.
ClaytonPFeldmanMPLoweNJ (2018) Behind the scenes: Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives32(1): 104–124.
15.
CohenB (2006) Sustainable Valley entrepreneurial ecosystem. Business Strategy and the Environment15(1): 1–14.
16.
ColemanSRobbAM (2009) A comparison of new firm financing by gender: Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey data. Small Business Economics33: 397–411.
17.
ColemanSRobbAM (2012) A Rising Tide: Financing Strategies for Women-Owned Firms. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
ColemanSRobbAM (2016) The Next Wave: Financing Women’s Growth-Oriented Firms. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
EisenhardtKM (1989) Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
20.
EisenhardtKGraebnerME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal50(1): 25–32.
21.
FeldmanM (2001) The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change10: 861–891.
22.
FeldmanMPFrancisJL (2006) Entrepreneurs as agents in the formation of industrial clusters. In: Asheim B, Cooke P and Martin R (eds) Clusters and Regional Development: Critical Reflections and Explorations. London: Routledge, pp. 115–136.
23.
Freire-GibbLCGregsonG (2019) Innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Implications for policy and practice in Latin America. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit34(8): 787–806.
24.
Gartner WB and Birley S (2002) Introduction to the special issue on qualitative methods in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing 17(5): 387--395.
25.
GranovetterMS (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology91: 481–510.
26.
HaltiwangerJJarminRSMirandaJ (2013) Who creates jobs? Small vs. large vs. young. Review of Economics and Statistics95(2): 347–361.
27.
Harper-AndersonE (2019) Contemporary black entrepreneurship in the professional service sector of Chicago: Intersections of race, entrepreneurship, and economic transformation. Urban Affairs Review55(3): 800–831.
JenningsJEBrushCG (2013) Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature?The Academy of Management Annals7(1): 663–715.
30.
LinerEBhandariR (2017) America’s Got Talent – Venture Capital Needs to Find It. Washington, DC: Third Way.
31.
MaleckiE (2018) Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass12(3): 1–21.
32.
ManolovaTBrushCGEdelmanLF, et al. (2012) One size does not fit all: Entrepreneurial expectancies and growth intentions of US women and men nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development24(1–2): 7–27.
33.
MarlowSMcAdamM (2012) Analyzing the influence of gender upon high-technology venturing within the context of business incubation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(4): 655–676.
34.
MartinRSunleyP (2003) Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea?Journal of Economic Geography3: 5–35.
35.
MasonC (2008) Entrepreneurial dynamics and the origin and growth of high-tech clusters. In: Karlsson C (ed.) Handbook of Research on Innovation and Clusters. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 33–53.
36.
MasonCBrownR (2014) Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
37.
MasonCHarrisonRT (2006) After the exit: Acquisitions, entrepreneurial recycling and regional economic development. Regional Studies40(1): 55–73.
38.
MinnitiM (2009) Gender issues in entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship5(7–8): 497–621.
39.
MinnitiMNardoneC (2007) Being in someone else’s shoes: The role of gender in nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics28: 223–238.
40.
MotoyamaY (2008) What was new about the cluster theory? What could it answer and what could it not answer?Economic Development Quarterly22: 353–363.
41.
MotoyamaY (2015) The Regional Environment in Indianapolis: Insights from High-Growth Companies. Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series. Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
42.
MotoyamaY (2019) From Innovation to Entrepreneurship: Connectivity-Based Regional Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edgard Elgar.
43.
MotoyamaY (2020) Beyond formal policies: Informal functions of mayor’s offices to promote entrepreneurship. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit35(2): 155–164.
44.
MotoyamaYKnowltonK (2017) Examining connections within the startup ecosystem: A case study of St. Louis. Entrepreneurship Research Journal7(1): 1–32.
45.
MotoyamaYKonczalJBell-MastersonJ, et al. (2014) Think Locally, Act Locally: Building a Robust Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series. Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
46.
MunteanSC (2013) Wind beneath my wings: Policies promoting high-growth oriented women entrepreneurs. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship5(1): 36–59.
47.
NeckHMMeyerGDCohenB, et al. (2004) An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management42(2): 190–208.
48.
NeergaardHUlhøiJP (eds) (2007) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
49.
NeumeyerXSantosSCCaetanoA, et al. (2019) Entrepreneurship ecosystems and women entrepreneurs: A social capital and network approach. Small Business Economics53: 475–489.
50.
Porter ME (1998) Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review 76(6): 77--90.
51.
PorterME (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly14(1): 15–34.
52.
QianH (2018) Knowledge-based regional economic development: A synthetic review of knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship, and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Economic Development Quarterly32(2):
53.
RatinhoT (2020) The domains of entrepreneurship support. In: Novotny A, Rasmussen E, Clausen TH, et al. (eds) Research Handbook on Start-up Incubation Ecosystems (pp. 60--73). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
54.
RossAGAdamsJCrossanK (2015) Entrepreneurship and the spatial context: A panel data study into regional determinants of small growing firms in Scotland. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit30(6): 672–688.
55.
Ruef M (2010) The entrepreneurial group: Social identities, relations, and collective action. Princeton University Press.
56.
Sperber S and Linder C (2019) Gender-specifics in start-up strategies and the role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics 53: 533--546.
57.
SpigelB (2016) Relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice41(1): 49–72.
58.
SpigelB (2017) Bourdieu, culture, and the economic geography of practice: Entrepreneurial mentorship in Ottawa and Waterloo, Canada. Journal of Economic Geography17(2): 287–310.
59.
StamE (2015) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies23(9): 1759–1769.
60.
StamESpigelB, (2018) Entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: Blackburn R, De Clercq D, Heinonen J, et al. (eds) Sage Handbook for Entrepreneurship and Small Business. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 407–422.
61.
Thiel P (2014) Zero to One. Random House.
62.
TreichelMZScottJA (2006) Women-owned businesses and access to bank credit: Evidence from three surveys since 1987. Venture Capital8(1): 51–67.
63.
Wheadon M and Duval-Couetil N (2019) The gendering of entrepreneurship on reality television. Journal of Small Business Management 57(4): 1676--1697.
