Focusing on the issue of loss of image spatial structure information in the current oil painting style recognition research, this paper first preprocesses the oil painting image, then combines the spatial information and grayscale information to improve the fuzzy clustering algorithm (FCM) (EFCM), and utilizes the EFCM to segment the oil painting image. On this basis, the fourth-order tensor training samples are constructed for the segmented oil painting images, and the oil painting image features are extracted using multilinear principal component analysis (MPCA). Finally, the support vector machine (SVM) optimized by the improved particle swarm algorithm (EAPSO) is used for oil painting style recognition. The simulation outcome demonstrates that the offered model has an average recognition accuracy (mAP) of 96.2%, which is better than the comparison model, and provides a new technical path for the accurate recognition of oil painting style.
KimJJunJYHongM, et al.Classification of oil painting using machine learning with visualized depth information. The international archives of the photogrammetry. Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci2019; 42: 617–623.
2.
YiG. Oil painting teaching design based on the mobile platform in higher art education. Sci Rep2024; 14: 15–21.
3.
ChengJYangLTongS. Painting style and sentiment recognition using multi-feature fusion and style migration techniques. Informatica2024; 48: 127–138.
4.
ZengX. Research on cross‐contrast neural network based intelligent painting: taking oil painting language classification as an example. Comput Intell Neurosci2022; 20: 78–89.
5.
AlbadarnehIAAhmadA. Machine learning based oil painting authentication and features extraction. IJCSNS2017; 17: 8–14.
6.
ChengJYangLTongS. Recognition and analysis of painting styles with the help of computer vision techniques. Informatica2024; 48: 127–138.
7.
GuoW. Oil painting art style extraction method based on image data recognition. Math Probl Eng2022; 13: 41–54.
8.
HuangQ. Adaptive extraction of oil painting texture features based on reaction diffusion equation. Adv Math Phys2021; 9: 21–32.
9.
ZhaoY. Formation and schema analysis of oil painting style based on texture and color texture features under few shot. Comput Intell Neurosci2022; 13: 41–56.
10.
ShengJSongCWangJ, et al.Convolutional neural network style transfer towards Chinese paintings. IEEE Access2019; 7: 163719–163728.
11.
GultepeEConturoTEMakrehchiM. Predicting and grouping digitized paintings by style using unsupervised feature learning. J Cult Herit2018; 31: 13–23.
12.
Nunez-GarciaILizarraga-MoralesRAHernandez-BelmonteUH, et al.Classification of paintings by artistic style using color and texture features. CyS2022; 26: 1503–1514.
13.
HuBYangY. Construction of a painting image classification model based on AI stroke feature extraction. J Intell Syst2024; 33: 1–11.
14.
LeiTLiuPJiaX, et al.Automatic fuzzy clustering framework for image segmentation. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst2019; 28: 2078–2092.
15.
WangQ. Painting style recognition and classification based on convolutional neural network and multi-Kernel learning. Intell Comput Technol Autom2024; 10: 1059–1066.
16.
BaiSLiP. Algorithm and simulation study of oil painting classification based on visual perception and improved embedded learning. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2023; 45: 9979–9989.
17.
ChuW-TWuY-L. Image style classification based on learnt deep correlation features. IEEE Trans Multimedia2018; 20: 2491–2502.
18.
ShiHYangYWangL, et al.Two-dimensional functional principal component analysis for image feature extraction. J Comput Graph Stat2022; 31: 1127–1140.
19.
TaoYLamECTangYY. Feature extraction using wavelet and fractal. Pattern Recognit Lett2001; 22: 271–287.
20.
YangWSunCZhangL. A multi-manifold discriminant analysis method for image feature extraction. Pattern Recogn2011; 44: 1649–1657.
21.
XiaoBLiH. Painting style classification and art image analysis model by fusion of convolutional neural network and principal component analysis. J Comput Methods Sci and Eng2025; 9: 12–27.
22.
ChenTYangJ. A novel multi-feature fusion method in merging information of heterogenous-view data for oil painting image feature extraction and recognition. Front Neurorobot2021; 15: 70–81.
23.
MaJYuanY. Dimension reduction of image deep feature using PCA. J Vis Commun Image Represent2019; 63: 25–38.
24.
JinX. Application of machine vision based on genetic algorithm in image painting style method and image processing optimization. Soft Comput2023; 5: 1–9.
25.
LuHPlataniotisKNVenetsanopoulosAN. MPCA: multilinear principal component analysis of tensor objects. IEEE Trans Neural Netw2008; 19: 18–39.
26.
HanFLengCLiB, et al.Cosine multilinear principal component analysis for recognition. IEEE Trans Big Data2023; 9: 1620–1630.
27.
MathewJVijaya KumarR. Multilinear principal component analysis with SVM for disease diagnosis on big data. IETE J Res2022; 68: 526–540.
28.
NelsonRARobertsRG. Some multilinear variants of principal component analysis: examples in grayscale image recognition and reconstruction. IEEE Syst Man Cybern Mag2021; 7: 25–35.
29.
GroverN. A study of various fuzzy clustering algorithms. Int J Eng Res2014; 3: 177–181.
30.
ChoySKLamSYYuKW, et al.Fuzzy model-based clustering and its application in image segmentation. Pattern Recogn2017; 68: 141–157.
31.
ChernovVAlanderJBochkoV. Integer-based accurate conversion between RGB and HSV color spaces. Comput Electr Eng2015; 46: 328–337.
32.
GassSIRapcsákT. Singular value decomposition in AHP. Eur J Oper Res2004; 154: 573–584.
33.
TanveerMRajaniTRastogiR, et al.Comprehensive review on twin support vector machines. Ann Oper Res2024; 339: 1223–1268.
34.
GadAG. Particle swarm optimization algorithm and its applications: a systematic review. Arch Comput Methods Eng2022; 29: 2531–2561.
35.
ZhangX. Oil painting image style recognition based on ResNet-NTS network. J Radiat Res Appl Sci2024; 17: 10–23.
