Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The effective tracking and management of on-site operations in power infrastructure (PI) is critical for assuring operational reliability and avoiding service interruptions. Traditional monitoring systems are frequently constrained by human error, slow response times, and the inability to give real-time data on system conditions. This research uses a digital system to identify on-site operations of PI, utilizing Time-Stamped Measurements (TSM) to provide real-time monitoring and problem identification. The suggested system architecture is made up of both software and hardware parts that work together to collect, process, and evaluate data concurrently for fault detection and condition estimate in PI. Various types of sensors are installed throughout the power grid to collect data on operating characteristics such as current, temperature, voltage, and performance metrics. The collection of TSM is an important step in the proposed system since it provides precise, time-based data required for reliable problem identification and operational analysis. The sensors communicate TSM to IoT devices or gateways and employ communication protocols such as Wi-Fi to deliver the data to the main server or cloud server. Before the analysis, the raw data is pre-processed, utilizing data normalization and feature extraction using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). Intelligent Genetic Energy Valley Optimizer (IntGen-EVO) is used to detect defects in real time using time-stamped data. The framework demonstrates superior accuracy (98.7%), precision (98.3%), recall (98%), and F1-score (98.4%) compared to traditional methods, significantly enhancing fault detection in the PI system. The findings demonstrate the method provides accurate concurrent insights into the infrastructure’s operational state, allowing for preventive maintenance and rapid identification of problems. Therefore, the digital system described in this research provides an effective solution for increasing operational effectiveness and reliability in PI management.

Keywords

power infrastructure (PI)digital system time-stamped measurements (TSM)intelligent genetic energy valley optimizer (IntG-EVO)fault detection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Khazaali

Bocchini

. Component-based fragility analysis of transmission towers subjected to hurricane wind load. Eng Struct 2021; 242: 112586. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112586.

Manninen

Ramlal

Singh

, et al. Multi-stage deep learning networks for automated assessment of electricity transmission infrastructure using fly-by images. Elec Power Syst Res 2022; 209: 107948. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.107948.

Shihavuddin

Rashid

Maruf

, et al. Image-based surface damage detection of renewable energy installations using a unified deep learning approach. Energy Rep 2021; 7: 4566–4576. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.045.

Odo

McKenna

Flynn

, et al. Aerial image analysis using deep learning for electrical overhead line network asset management. IEEE Access 2021; 9: 146281–146295. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3123158.

Siddiqui

Park

. A drone-based transmission line components inspection system with deep learning technique. Energies 2020; 13(13): 3348. DOI: 10.3390/en13133348.

Djenouri

Belhadi

Srivastava

, et al. Fast and accurate deep learning framework for secure fault diagnosis in the industrial internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J 2021; 10(4): 2802–2810. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3092275.

Zhang

Wang

Song

, et al. An edge visual incremental perception framework based on deep semi-supervised learning for monitoring power transmission lines. CSEE J Power Energy Sys 2023; 9(2): 759–768. DOI: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2022.03120.

Braik

Koliou

. A novel digital twin framework of electric power infrastructure systems subjected to hurricanes. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2023; 97: 104020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104020.

Salvi

Spagnoletti

Noori

. Cyber-resilience of critical cyber infrastructures: integrating digital twins in the electric power ecosystem. Comput Secur 2022; 112: 102507. DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102507.

10.

Peng

. Internet infrastructure, digital development and urban energy efficiency. J Digital Econ 2024; 3: 62–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdec.2024.11.001.

11.

Broo

Bravo-Haro

Schooling

. Design and implementation of a smart infrastructure digital twin. Autom ConStruct 2022; 136: 104171. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104171.

12.

Wang

. Digital infrastructure and innovation: digital divide or digital dividend? J Innov Knowl 2024; 9(3): 100542. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100542.

13.

Rivas

Abrao

. Faults in smart grid systems: monitoring, detection and classification. Elec Power Syst Res 2020; 189: 106602. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106602.

14.

Elsisi

Tran

Mahmoud

, et al. Effective IoT-based deep learning platform for online fault diagnosis of power transformers against cyberattacks and data uncertainties. Measurement 2022; 190: 110686. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110686.

15.

Dhiman

Deb

Muyeen

, et al. Wind turbine gearbox anomaly detection based on adaptive threshold and twin support vector machines. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 2021; 36(4): 3462–3469. DOI: 10.1109/TEC.2021.3075897.

16.

Darvishi

Ciuonzo

Eide

, et al. Sensor-fault detection, isolation and accommodation for digital twins via modular data-driven architecture. IEEE Sens J 2020; 21(4): 4827–4838. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3029459.

17.

Andrusca

Adam

Dragomir

, et al. Innovative integrated solution for monitoring and protection of power supply system from railway infrastructure. Sensors 2021; 21(23): 7858. DOI: 10.3390/s21237858.

18.

Kandanaarachchi

Anantharama

Munoz

. Early detection of vegetation ignition due to powerline faults. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2020; 36(3): 1324–1334. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3006553.

19.

Cepeda

Orozco-Henao

Percybrooks

, et al. Intelligent fault detection system for microgrids. Energies 2020; 13(5): 1223. DOI: 10.3390/en13051223.

20.

Manninen

Ramlal

Singh

, et al. Toward automatic condition assessment of high-voltage transmission infrastructure using deep learning techniques. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2021; 128: 106726. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106726.

21.

Ulasyar

Khattak

, et al. Cloud based IoT solution for fault detection and localization in power distribution systems. Energies 2020; 13(11): 2686. DOI: 10.3390/en13112686.

22.

Odongo

Musabe

Hanyurwimfura

, et al. An efficient LoRa-enabled smart fault detection and monitoring platform for the power distribution system using self-powered IoT devices. IEEE Access 2022; 10: 73403–73420. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3189002.

23.

Yousaf

Singh

Khalid

, et al. Enhancing HVDC transmission line fault detection using disjoint bagging and Bayesian optimization with artificial neural networks and scientometric insights. Sci Rep 2024; 14(1): 23610. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74300-z.

24.

Azizi

Seker

. Microgrid fault detection and classification based on the boosting ensemble method with the Hilbert-Huang transform. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2021; 37(3): 2289–2300. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2021.3109023.

25.

Muhs

Parvania

Shahidehpour

. Wildfire risk mitigation: a paradigm shift in power systems planning and operation. IEEE Open J Power Energy 2020; 7: 366–375. DOI: 10.1109/OAJPE.2020.3030023.

26.

Alhanaf

Farsadi

Balik

. Fault detection and classification in ring power system with DG penetration using hybrid CNN-LSTM. IEEE Access 2024; 12: 59953–59975. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3394166.

27.

Khan

Asad

Vaimann

, et al. Improved Fault classification and localization in power transmission networks using VAE-generated synthetic data and machine learning algorithms. Machines 2023; 11(10): 963. DOI: 10.3390/machines11100963.

28.

Almasoudi

. Grid distribution fault occurrence and remedial measures prediction/forecasting through different deep learning neural networks by using real time data from Tabuk city power grid. Energies 2023; 16(3): 1026. DOI: 10.3390/en16031026.

29.

Ukwuoma

Cai

Bamisile

, et al. Power transmission system’s fault location, detection, and classification: pay close attention to transmission nodes. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2024; 156: 109771. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109771.

30.

Govea

Gaibor-Naranjo

Villegas-Ch

. Transforming cybersecurity into critical energy infrastructure: a study on the effectiveness of artificial intelligence. Systems 2024; 12(5): 165. DOI: 10.3390/systems12050165.

Research on digital system for identifying on-site operations of power infrastructure based on time-stamped measurements (TSM)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References