At present, the conventional hybrid teaching effect evaluation method is limited by the teaching means and teaching contents, which leads to the low efficiency of teaching effect evaluation, in this regard, the online and offline hybrid teaching effect evaluation method of literature theory course is proposed. Firstly, the multi-index evaluation system is constructed, the weight values of evaluation indexes are calculated, the affiliation function of evaluation indexes is constructed, and finally the multi-index evaluation model is used to evaluate the online and offline hybrid teaching effect of literature theory courses. In the experiment, the evaluation efficiency of the proposed method is verified. The analysis of the experimental results shows that when the proposed method is used to evaluate the teaching effect, the evaluation method takes less time to run and has high evaluation efficiency.
WangYLiuQ. Effects of online teaching presence on students' interactions and collaborative knowledge construction. J Comput Assist Lear2020; 36(3): 370–382.
2.
NomuraRTakaseSMoriguchiS, et al.Multiscale evaluation method of the drag effect on shallow water flow through coastal forests based on 3D numerical simulations. Int J Numer Meth Fl2022; 94(1): 32–58.
3.
DuanX. Construction of the teaching evaluation system of computer basic course based on big data. Basic Clin Pharmacol2020; 127(S1): 167.
4.
JahantighFFOstovareM. Application of a hybrid method for performance evaluation of teaching hospitals in Tehran. Qual Manag Health Ca2020; 29(4): 210–217.
5.
RiekenCJDotsonWHCarterSL, et al.An evaluation of interteaching in an asynchronous online graduate-level behavior analysis course. Teach Psychol2018; 45(3): 264–269.
6.
LeeSDuQ. Quantifying native speakerism in second language (L2) writing: a study of student evaluations of teaching. Appl Linguist2021; 42(3): 541–568.
7.
HuangCYWangJC. Effectiveness of a three-dimensional-printing curriculum: developing and evaluating an elementary school design-oriented model course. Comput Educ2022; 187: 104553.
8.
Emblen-PerryK. Can sustainability audits provide effective, hands-on business sustainability learning, teaching and assessment for business management undergraduates?Int J Sust Higher Ed2019; 20(7): 1191–1219.
9.
ChaoKYYangBH. Integration of a service-learning component into a course on nursing care for children with developmental disorders: a mixed-methods study. Nurs Educ Today2022; 113: 105364.
10.
BestMCJonesKWashingtonJ, et al.Evaluation of the interprofessional spiritual care education curriculum in Australia: online. Palliat Support Care2023; 21(1): 65–73.
11.
FauthBWagnerWBertramC, et al.Don’t blame the teacher? The need to account for classroom characteristics in evaluations of teaching quality. J Educ Psychol2019; 112(6): 1284–1302.
12.
WallaceTLParrAKCorrentiRJ. Assessing teachers’ classroom management competency: a case study of the classroom assessment scoring system-secondary. J Psychoeduc Assess2020; 38(4): 475–492.
13.
WiemanCE. Expertise in University teaching the implications for teaching effectiveness, evaluation training. Daedalus2019; 148(4): 47–78.
14.
BrantlingerAGrantAAMillerJ, et al.Maintaining gaps in teacher diversity, preparedness, effectiveness, and retention? A program theory evaluation of mathematics teacher training in the New York city teaching fellows. Educ Policy2020; 36(6): 1227–1260.
15.
FanYBudescuDVMandelD, et al.Improving accuracy by coherence weighting of direct and ratio probability judgments. Decis Anal2019; 16(3): 197–217.
16.
NizamaniSNizamaniSBasirN, et al.Heuristic evaluation versus guideline reviews: a tale of comparing two domain usability expert’s evaluation methods. IEEE T Prof Commun2022; 65(4): 516–529.
17.
YangJShenLJinX, et al.Evaluating the quality of simulation teaching in Fundamental Nursing Curriculum: AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Nurs Educ Today2019; 77: 77–82.
18.
Ramirez-AiellanoAAcosta-GonzagaEBory-ReyesJ, et al.Factors affecting student learning performance: a causal model in higher blended education. J Comput Assist Lear2018; 34(6): 807–815.
19.
ChangHSSuQ. Research on constructing sponge city indicator and decision evaluation model with fuzzy multiple criteria method. Water Environ Res2020; 92(11): 1910–1921.
HuangSBJengYLLaiCF. Note-taking learning system: the use of the learning style theory and the peer learning method on computer programming course. J Educ Comput Res2021; 59(5): 870–895.
22.
WangY. Evaluation model of mixed English teaching model of network combined classroom under the influence of COVID-19 epidemic. Basic Clin Pharmacol2020; 127(S1): 277.
23.
SuLLiHLiZ, et al.Identification of unbalanced bids based on grey-fuzzy evaluation method. Can J Civ Eng2020; 47(3): 272–278.
24.
MaLLeeCS. Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the ARCS model. J Comput Assist Lear2021; 37(5): 1397–1408.
