Dementia is one of the prominent conditions for which an aging population has been seeking end-of-life solutions such as assisted dying. Individuals with dementia, however, are often unable to meet the eligibility criteria of being mentally competent and are thus discriminated against in relation to assisted dying laws. Provided that the assisted death directive is being made in sound mind, it is still of concern whether these advance directives can be appropriately framed and safeguarded to protect the wish of these vulnerable individuals while preventing harm. Therefore, to establish consensus views of experts on primary issues of, and concerns about, assisted dying for individuals with dementia as well as exploring tentative conceptual framework to safeguard practice and application, a three-round Delphi study was conducted. A core group of 12 experts from five countries was recruited comprising expertise in domains relevant to assisted dying and dementia. A semantic–thematic approach was applied to analyze the 119 generated statements. Evaluation of these research statements resulted in full consensus of 84 (70%) items. Our primary findings highlight seven core domains: applicability of assisted dying for dementia; ethical, practical, and pathological issues regarding the application of assisted dying; and ethical, legal, and professional recommendations for the ways forward. Despite the issues surrounding the provision of assisted death for individuals with dementia, our findings lead us to cautiously conclude that devising “adequate” safeguards is achievable. The result of this research may benefit future research and practice.
AucklandC. (2017). Protecting me from my directive: Ensuring appropriate safeguards for advance directives in dementia. Medical Law Review, 26(1), 73–97.
2.
BanerjeeS. (2010). Living well with dementia—Development of the national dementia strategy for England. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25(9), 917–922.
3.
BeattieA.Daker-WhiteG.GilliardJ.MeansR. (2004). “How can they tell?” A qualitative study of the views of younger people about their dementia and dementia care services. Health & Social Care in the Community, 12(4), 359–368.
4.
BoltE. E.SnijdewindM. C.WillemsD. L.Van der HeideA.Onwuteaka-PhilipsenB. D. (2015). Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living?Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(8), 592–598.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
6.
BreslinJ. M.MacRaeS. K.BellJ.SingerP. A. (2005). Top 10 health care ethics challenges facing the public: Views of Toronto bioethicists. BMC Medical Ethics, 6(1), 5.
7.
BuitingH. M.GeversJ. K.RietjensJ. A.Onwuteaka-PhilipsenB. D.Van der MaasP. J.Van der HeideA.Van DeldenJ. J. (2008). Dutch criteria of due care for physician-assisted dying in medical practice: A physician perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(9), e12.
8.
ChernyN. I.RadbruchL; Board of the European Association for Palliative Care (2009). European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 23(7), 581–593.
9.
ClareL. (2003). Managing threats to self: Awareness in early stage Alzheimer’s disease. Social Science & Medicine, 57(6), 1017–1029.
10.
Cohen-AlmagorR. (2015). First do no harm: Intentionally shortening lives of patients without their explicit request in Belgium. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(8), 625–629.
11.
ColemanT. (2000). Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: Advantages and limitations. Family Practice, 17(5), 422–427.
12.
CunninghamE. L.McGuinnessB.HerronB.PassmoreA. P. (2015). Dementia. The Ulster Medical Journal, 84(2), 79–87.
13.
DalkeyN.HelmerO. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467.
14.
De BoerM. E.DröesR.JonkerC.EefstingJ. A.HertoghC. M. (2010a). Advance directives for euthanasia in dementia: Do law-based opportunities lead to more euthanasia?Health Policy, 98(2–3), 256–262.
15.
De BoerM. E.DröesR.JonkerC.EefstingJ. A.HertoghC. M. (2011). Advance directives for euthanasia in dementia: How do they affect resident care in Dutch nursing homes? Experiences of physicians and relatives. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59(6), 989–996.
16.
De BoerM. E.HertoghC. M.DröesR.JonkerC.EefstingJ. A. (2010b). Advance directives in dementia: Issues of validity and effectiveness. International Psychogeriatrics, 22(2), 201–208.
17.
De BoerM. E.HertoghC. M.DröesR.RiphagenI. I.JonkerC.EefstingJ. A. (2007). Suffering from dementia–The patient’s perspective: A review of the literature. International Psychogeriatrics, 19(6), 1021–1039.
18.
De LoëR. C.MelnychukN.MurrayD.PlummerR. (2016). Advancing the state of policy Delphi practice: A systematic review evaluating methodological evolution, innovation, and opportunities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 78–88.
19.
DickinsonC.BamfordC.ExleyC.EmmettC.HughesJ.RobinsonL. (2013). Planning for tomorrow whilst living for today: The views of people with dementia and their families on advance care planning. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(12), 2011–2021.
20.
Diehl-SchmidJ.JoxR.GauthierS.BellevilleS.RacineE.SchüleC.TureckiG.Richard-DevantoyS. (2017). Suicide and assisted dying in dementia: What we know and what we need to know. A narrative literature review. International Psychogeriatrics, 29(8), 1247–1259.
21.
Dierickx, S., Deliens, L., Cohen, J., & Chambaere, K. (2017). Euthanasia for people with psychiatric disorders or dementia in Belgium: analysis of officially reported cases. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 203.
22.
Dixon, J., Karagiannidou, M., & Knapp, M. (2018). The effectiveness of advance care planning in improving end-of-life outcomes for people with dementia and their carers: a systematic review and critical discussion. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 55(1), 132–150.
23.
DownieJ.Lloyd-SmithG. (2015). Assisted dying for individuals with dementia: Challenges for translating ethical positions into law. In CholbiM.VareliusJ.(Eds.), New directions in the ethics of assisted suicide and euthanasia (pp. 97–123). Springer.
24.
DyerO.WhiteC.Garcia RadaA. (2015). Assisted dying: Law and practice around the world. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 351, h4481.
25.
EmanuelE. J.EmanuelL. L. (1992). Proxy decision making for incompetent patients: An ethical and empirical analysis. JAMA, 267(15), 2067–2071.
26.
EmanuelL. L. (1995). Advance directives: Do they work?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(1), 35–38.
27.
FrankishH.HortonR. (2017). Prevention and management of dementia: A priority for public health. Lancet (London, England), 390(10113), 2614–2615.
28.
GastmansC.De LepeleireJ. (2010). Living to the bitter end? A personalist approach to euthanasia in persons with severe dementia. Bioethics, 24(2), 78–86.
29.
GastmansC.DenierY. (2010). What if patients with dementia use decision aids to make an advance euthanasia request?The American Journal of Bioethics, 10(4), 25–26.
30.
GilliesB. A. (2000). A memory like clockwork: Accounts of living through dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 4(4), 366–374.
31.
GoveD.SparrS.BernardoA. D. S.CosgraveM.JansenS.MartenssonB.PointonB.TudoseC.HolmerovaI. (2010). Recommendations on end-of-life care for people with dementia. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 14(2), 136–139.
32.
HarmanG.ClareL. (2006). Illness representations and lived experience in early-stage dementia. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 484–502.
33.
HassonF.KeeneyS.McKennaH. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015.
34.
HertoghC. M. (2009). The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(2), 100–103.
35.
HertoghC. M.de BoerM. E.DröesR.EefstingJ. A. (2007). Would we rather lose our life than lose our self? Lessons from the Dutch debate on euthanasia for patients with dementia. The American Journal of Bioethics, 7(4), 48–56.
36.
HirschhornF. (2019). Reflections on the application of the Delphi method: Lessons from a case in public transport research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(3), 309–322.
37.
HsuC.SandfordB. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.
38.
JuengerS.PayneS. A.BrineJ.RadbruchL.BrearleyS. G. (2017). Guidance on conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 31(8), 684–706.
39.
KeeneyS.HassonF.McKennaH. P. (2011). The Delphi technique in nursing and health research (Vol. 1). Wiley-Blackwell.
40.
KouwenhovenP. S.RaijmakersN. J.Van DeldenJ. J.RietjensJ. A.SchermerM. H.Van ThielG.TrappenburgM. J.Van de VathorstS.Van der VegtB. J.VezzoniC.WeyersH.Van TolD. G.Van der HeideA. (2013). Opinions of health care professionals and the public after eight years of euthanasia legislation in the Netherlands: A mixed methods approach. Palliative Medicine, 27(3), 273–280.
41.
KouwenhovenP. S.RaijmakersN. J.Van DeldenJ. J.RietjensJ. A.Van TolD. G.van de VathorstS.De GraeffN.WeyersH. A. M.Van der HeideA.Van ThielG. J. (2015). Opinions about euthanasia and advanced dementia: A qualitative study among Dutch physicians and members of the general public. BMC Medical Ethics, 16(1), 7.
42.
KouwenhovenP. S.Van ThielG. J.Van der HeideA.RietjensJ. A.Van DeldenJ. J. (2019). Developments in euthanasia practice in the Netherlands: Balancing professional responsibility and the patient’s autonomy. European Journal of General Practice, 25(1), 44–48.
43.
LegemaateJ.BoltI. (2013). The Dutch Euthanasia Act: Recent legal developments. European Journal of Health Law, 20(5), 451–469.
44.
LewisP.BlackI. (2013). Adherence to the request criterion in jurisdictions where assisted dying is lawful? A review of the criteria and evidence in the Netherlands, Belgium, Oregon, and Switzerland. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 41(4), 885–898.
45.
LichtnerV.DowdingD.EsterhuizenP.ClossS. J.LongA. F., Corbett, A., & BriggsM. (2014). Pain assessment for people with dementia: A systematic review of systematic reviews of pain assessment tools. BMC Geriatrics, 14(1), 138.
46.
MartyrA.NelisS. M.QuinnC.WuY.LamontR. A.HendersonC.ClarkeR.HindleJ. V.ThomJ. M.JonesI. R.MorrisR. G.RustedJ. M.VictorC. R.ClareL. (2018). Living well with dementia: A systematic review and correlational meta-analysis of factors associated with quality of life, well-being and life satisfaction in people with dementia. Psychological Medicine, 48(13), 2130–2139.
47.
MitchellS. L. (2015). Advanced dementia. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(26), 2533–2540.
48.
Monforte-RoyoC.Villavicencio-ChávezC.Tomás-SábadoJ.Mahtani-ChuganiV.BalaguerA. (2012). What lies behind the wish to hasten death? A systematic review and meta-ethnography from the perspective of patients. PLoS One, 7(5), e37117.
49.
OkoliC.PawlowskiS. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29.
50.
Onwuteaka-PhilipsenB. D.Van der WalG. (2001). A protocol for consultation of another physician in cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27(5), 331–337.
51.
PooleM.BamfordC.McLellanE.LeeR. P.ExleyC.HughesJ. C.Harrison-DeningK.RobinsonL. (2018). End-of-life care: A qualitative study comparing the views of people with dementia and family carers. Palliative Medicine, 32(3), 631–642.
52.
PowellC. (2003). The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376–382.
RobinsonL.DickinsonC.BamfordC.ClarkA.HughesJ.ExleyC. (2013). A qualitative study: Professionals’ experiences of advance care planning in dementia and palliative care, ‘a good idea in theory but…. Palliative Medicine, 27(5), 401–408.
55.
Rodríguez-PratA.Monforte-RoyoC.Porta-SalesJ.EscribanoX.BalaguerA. (2016). Patient perspectives of dignity, autonomy and control at the end of life: Systematic review and meta-ethnography. PloS One, 11(3), e0151435.
56.
RurupM. L.Onwuteaka-PhilipsenB. D.PasmanH. R. W.RibbeM. W.Van der WalG. (2006). Attitudes of physicians, nurses and relatives towards end-of-life decisions concerning nursing home patients with dementia. Patient Education and Counseling, 61(3), 372–380.
57.
RurupM. L.Onwuteaka-PhilipsenB. D.Van der HeideA.Van der WalG.Van der MaasP. J. (2005). Physicians’ experiences with demented patients with advance euthanasia directives in the Netherlands. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(7), 1138–1144.
58.
SachsG. A.ShegaJ. W.Cox-HayleyD. (2004). Barriers to excellent end-of-life care for patients with dementia. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(10), 1057–1063.
59.
SchroepferT. A. (2006). Mind frames towards dying and factors motivating their adoption by terminally ill elders. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(3), S129–S139.
60.
TomlinsonE.StottJ. (2015). Assisted dying in dementia: A systematic review of the international literature on the attitudes of health professionals, patients, carers and the public, and the factors associated with these. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 30(1), 10–20.
61.
TongaJ. B.EilertsenD.SolemI. K. L.ArnevikE. A.KorsnesM. S.UlsteinI. D. (2020). Effect of self-efficacy on quality of life in people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: The mediating roles of depression and anxiety. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias, 35, 1533317519885264.
62.
Van DeldenJ. J. (2004). The unfeasibility of requests for euthanasia in advance directives. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(5), 447–451.
63.
Van der HeideA.Van DeldenJ. J.Onwuteaka-PhilipsenB. D. (2017). End-of-life decisions in the Netherlands over 25 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(5), 492–494.
64.
Van der VormA.Vernooij-DassenM. J.KehoeP. G.Olde RikkertM. G.Van LeeuwenE.DekkersW. J. (2009). Ethical aspects of research into Alzheimer disease. A European Delphi Study focused on genetic and non-genetic research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(2), 140–144.
65.
Van TolD.RietjensJ.Van der HeideA. (2010). Judgment of unbearable suffering and willingness to grant a euthanasia request by Dutch general practitioners. Health Policy, 97(2–3), 166–172.
66.
VermandereM.De LepeleireJ.Van MechelenW.WarmenhovenF.ThoonsenB.AertgeertsB. (2013). Spirituality in palliative home care: A framework for the clinician. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(4), 1061–1069.
67.
VolicerL.SimardJ. (2015). Palliative care and quality of life for people with dementia: Medical and psychosocial interventions. International Psychogeriatrics, 27(10), 1623–1634.
68.
WainwrightP.GallagherA.TompsettH.AtkinsC. (2010). The use of vignettes within a Delphi exercise: A useful approach in empirical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(11), 656–660.
69.
WiddershovenG. A.BerghmansR. L. (2001). Advance directives in dementia care: From instructions to instruments. Patient Education and Counseling, 44(2), 179–186.
70.
WilliamsN.DunfordC.KnowlesA.WarnerJ. (2007). Public attitudes to life-sustaining treatments and euthanasia in dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: A Journal of the Psychiatry of Late Life and Allied Sciences, 22(12), 1229–1234.
71.
WinbladB.AmouyelP.AndrieuS.BallardC.BrayneC.BrodatyH.Cedazo-MinguezA.DuboisBEdvardssonD.FeldmanH.FratiglioniL.FrisoniG. B.GauthierS.GeorgesJ.GraffC.IqbalK.JessenF.JohanssonG.JönssonLZetterbergH. (2016). Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: A priority for European science and society. The Lancet Neurology, 15(5), 455–532.
