The dynamic nature of psychosocial interventions implies that trying to measure their effects using standardised clinical trial measures may not capture their full effects. Rich and valuable data during the sessions may be missed by using standard quality of life questionnaires. This paper compares observational measures in the context of recording the well-being of a person with dementia during and outside of a visual arts intervention. A literature search was conducted using systematic principles of searching, screening and retrieval to identify peer-reviewed English language evaluations of research projects using observational measures with people with dementia. Psychometric properties, strengths and weaknesses of 11 observational tools are reviewed in order to identify the most appropriate one for evaluating a visual art intervention for people with dementia. This review supports the Greater Cincinnati Chapter Well-Being Observation Tool as an appropriate measure to evaluate a visual art programme for people with dementia. The results of this review will help researchers plan projects to show the full range of effects for people with dementia for taking part in art sessions.
AltmanD. G. (1991) Some common problems in medical research. In: Practical statistics for medical research, London, England: Chapman & Hall, pp. 396–439.
2.
Alzheimer’s Disease International (2009). World Alzheimer’s report. London, England: Alzheimer’s Disease International. Retrieved from http://www.alz.co.uk/research/worldreport/.
AndersonK.BirdMacPhersonS.McDonoughV.DavisT. (2011) Findings from a pilot investigation of the effectiveness of a Snoezelen room in residential care: Should we be engaging with our residents more?Geriatric Nursing32: 166–177.
5.
AsplandH.GardnerF. (2003) Observational measures of parent-child interaction: An introductory review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health8: 136–143.
6.
BakerR.DowlingZ. (1995) INTERACT, Dorset: Poole Hospital Research and Development Support Unit.
7.
BanerjeeS.SmithS.LampingD.FoleyB.SmithP.MurrayJ. (2004) DEMQOL – evaluation of a new system for measuring quality of life in people with dementia: Validity, reliability and use in regular practice. Neurobiology of Aging25: S321.
BeardR. (2011) Art therapies and dementia care: A systematic review. Dementia11: 633–656.
10.
Bradford Dementia Group (2008) The Bradford well-being profile, Bradford: University of Bradford.
11.
BrodM.StewartA. L.SandsL.WaltonP. (1999) Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in dementia: The dementia quality of life instrument (DQoL). Gerontologist39: 25–35.
12.
BrookerD. (1995) Looking at them, looking at me. A review of observational studies into the quality of institutional care for elderly people with dementia. Journal of Mental Health4: 145–156. DOI:10.1080/09638239550037686.
13.
BrookerD. (2005) Dementia Care Mapping: A review of the research literature. The Gerontologist45: 11–18.
14.
BrookerD. (2008) Quality: The perspective of the person with dementia. In: DownsM.BowersB. (eds) Excellence in dementia care: Research into practice, Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 476–492.
15.
BrookerD.DuceL. (2000) Wellbeing and activity in dementia: A comparison of group reminiscence therapy, structured goal-directed group activity and unstructured time. Aging & Mental Health4: 354–358.
16.
BrookerD.SurrC. (2006) Dementia Care Mapping (DCM): Initial validation of DCM 8 in UK field trials. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry21: 1018–1025. doi:10.1002/gps.1600.
17.
BruceE. (2000) Looking after well-being: A tool for evaluation. Journal of Dementia CareNov/Dec: 25–27.
18.
ClareL.WhitakerR.QuinnC.JelleyH.HoareZ.WoodsB.WilsonB. (2012) AwareCare: Development and validation of an observational measure of awareness in people with severe dementia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: An International Journal22: 113–133. doi:10.1080/09602011.2011.640467.
19.
CooperC.MukadamN.KatonaC.LyketsosC. G.AmesD.RabinsP.LivingstoneG. (2012) Systematic review of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life of people with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics24: 856–870.
20.
DeanR.BriggsK.LindesayJ. (1993) The DOmus philosophy: A prospective evaluation of two residential units for the elderly mentally ill. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry8: 807–817.
21.
DeanR.ProudfootR.LindesayJ. (1993) The quality of interactions schedule (QUIS): development, reliability and use in the evaluation of two domus units. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry8: 819–826.
22.
EttemaT. P.DröesR.-M.de LangeJ.MellenberghG. J.RibbeM. W. (2005) A review of quality of life instruments used in dementia. Quality of Life Research14: 675–686.
23.
FeenyD.FurlongW.BoyleM.TorranceG. W. (1995) Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health Utilities Index. PharmoEconomics7: 490–502.
24.
FeenyD. H.FurlongW. J.TorranceG. W.GoldsmithC. H.ZhuZ.DePauwS.BoyleM. (2002) Multi-attribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care40: 113–128.
25.
FosseyJ.LeeL.BallardC. (2002) Dementia Care Mapping as a research tool for measuring quality of life in care settings: psychometric properties. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry17: 1064–1070.
26.
Gottlieb-TanakaD.LeeH.GrafP. (2008a) Creative-expressive abilities assessment: A user guide, Vancouver, British Columbia: ArtScience Press.
27.
Gottlieb-Tanaka, D., Lee, H. & Graf, P. (2008b). The CEAA: An instrument for assessing the creative-expressive abilities of individuals with dementia. ArtScience Press.
28.
GrossS. M.DanilovaD.VandeheyM. A.DiekoffG. M. (2013) Creativity and dementia: Does artistic activity affect well-being beyond the art class?Dementia. . Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1471301213488899.
29.
HadleyC.BrownS.SmithA. (1999) Evaluating interventions for people with severe dementia: Using the positive response schedule. Aging & Mental Health3: 234–240.
30.
HarrisP. B. (2002) The person with Alzheimer’s disease: Pathways to understanding the experience, London and Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
31.
JarrottS. E.GozaliT.GigliottiC. M. (2008) Montessori programming for persons with dementia in the group setting: An analysis of engagement and affect. Dementia7: 109–125. doi:10.1177/1471301207085370.
32.
JudgeK. S.CampC. J.Orsulic-JerasS. (2000) Use of Montessori-based activities for clients with dementia in adult day care: Effects on engagement. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias15: 42–46.
33.
KeadyJ. (1996) The experience of dementia: A review of the literature and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing5: 275–288.
34.
KinneyJ.RentzC. (2005) Observed well-being among individuals with dementia: Memories in the Making, an art program, versus other structured activity. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias20: 220–227.
35.
KitwoodT.BredinK. (1992) A new approach to the evaluation of dementia care. Journal of Advances in Health and Nursing Care1: 41–60.
36.
KlineP. (1979) The meaning of psychometrics. Psychometrics and Psychology, London: Academic Press Inc, pp. 1–25.
37.
LawtonM. P. (1983) The dimensions of wellbeing. Experimental Aging Research9: 65–72.
38.
LawtonM. P. (1991) A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders. In: LubbenJ. E.RoweJ. C.DeutchmanD. E. (eds) The concept and measurement of quality of life, New York: Academic Press, pp. 6.
39.
LawtonM. P.Van HaitsmanK.KlapperJ. (1996) Observed affect in nursing home residents with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences51B: 3–14.
40.
LawtonM. P.Van HaitsmanK.PerkinsonM.RuckdeschelK. (1999) Observed affect and quality of life in dementia: Further affirmations and problems. Journal of Mental Health and Aging5: 69–81.
41.
LogsdonR. G.GibbonsL. E.McCurryS. M.TeriL. (1999) Quality of life in Alzheimer’s disease: Patient and caregiver reports. Journal of Mental Health and Aging5: 21–32.
42.
MacPhersonS.BirdM.AndersonK.DavisT.BlairA. (2009) An art gallery access programme for people with dementia: ‘You do it for the moment’. Aging & Mental Health13: 744–752.
43.
MagazinerJ.SimonsickE. M.KasherT. M.HebelJ. R. (1988) Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology41: 1065–1074.
44.
Moniz-CookE.Vernooij-DassenM.WoodsR.VerheyF.ChattatR.VugtD. E.OrrellM.for The INTERDEM Group (2008) A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging & Mental Health12: 14–29.
45.
OlazaránJ.ReisbergB.ClareL.CruzI.Peña-CasanovaJ.del SerT.MunizR. (2010) Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review of efficacy. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders30: 161–178.
46.
PerrinT. (1997) The positive response schedule for severe dementia. Aging & Mental Health1: 184–191.
47.
PhillipsL. J.Reid-ArndtS. A.PakY. (2010) Effects of a creative expression intervention on emotions, communication, and quality of life in persons with dementia. Nursing Research59: 417–425.
48.
RabinsP. V.KasperJ. D.KleinmanL.BlackB. S.PatrickD. L. (1999) Concepts and methods in the development of the ADRQL: An instrument for assessing health-related quality of life in persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Mental Health and Aging5: 33–48.
49.
ReadyR. E.OttB. R.GraceJ.FernandezI. (2002) The Cornell-Brown scale for quality of life in dementia. Alzheimer’s Disease and Associated Disorders16: 109–115.
SabatS. R. (2001) Life through a tangled veil: The experience of Alzheimer’s disease, Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
SalisburyK.AlgarK.WindleG. (2011) Arts programmes and quality of life for people with dementia – a review. Journal of Dementia Care19: 33–37.
53.
SheardD. (2008) Enabling: Quality of life – an evaluation tool, London, England: Alzheimer’s Society.
54.
SloaneP. D.BrookerD.CohenL.DouglassC.EdelmanP.FultonB. R.ZimmermanS. (2007) Dementia care mapping as a research tool. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry22: 580–589.
55.
SterinG. J. (2002) Essay on a word. A lived experience of Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia1: 7–10.
56.
StreinerD. L.NormanG. R. (2003) Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
TeradaS.IshizuH.FujisawaY.FujitaD.YokotaO.NakashimaH.KurodaS. (2002) Development and evaluation of a health-related quality of life questionnaire for the elderly with dementia in Japan. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry17: 851–858.
58.
TerweeC. B.BotS. D. M.de BoerM. R.van der WindtD.KnolD. L.DekkerJ.de VetH. (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology60: 34–42.
59.
van DiepenE.BaillonS. F.RedmanJ.RookeN.SpencerD. A.PrettymanR. (2002) A pilot study of the physiological and behavioural effects of Snoezelen in dementia. British Journal of Occupational Therapy65: 61–66.
60.
van WeertJ. C. M.van DulmenA. M.SpreeuwenbergP. M. M.RibbeM. W.BensingJ. M. (2005) Behavioural and mood effects of snoezelen integrated into 24 hour care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society53: 24–33.
61.
WeinerM. F.Martin-CookK.SvetlikD. A.SaineK.FosterB.FontaineC. S. (2000) The quality of life in late-stage dementia (QUALID) scale. American Journal of the American Medical Medical Directors Association1: 114–116.
62.
World Health Organization (1995) The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine41: 1403–1409.
63.
World Health Organization. (2004). Ageing and Health Technical Report Volume 5: A glossary of terms for community health care and services for older persons. World Health Organisation Centre for Health Development, Geneva. Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/wkc/2004/WHO_WKC_Tech.Ser._04.2.pdf.
