New product development is a risky business. Companies can use a number of methods to assess the viability of a new product and reduce the risks associated with it. Judgmental new product forecasting is one of the widely used methods. Previous studies outline numerous ways of eliciting judgmental group forecasts with their advantages and disadvantages. With the rapid growth of the Internet, there are now also a few Internet-based group discussion tools that can offer valuable opportunities for judgmental new product forecasting. This paper presents an application of Internet-based groupware in judgmentally forecasting the adoption of two Internet services. The results showed that the participants found the method to be easy, reasonable and interesting and felt confident about their contributions to the group discussions. The findings also showed that the predictions based on this method were reasonably accurate with absolute errors of 4% to 5%.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenM., VanjaniM., & KrospJ.. (1995). Group decision support systems.Review of Business16, 3, 38–42.
ClarkD.. (1998) Start-up firm plans to attack spam e-mail.The Asian Wall Street Journal July 21, p. 11.
4.
Computerworld (1999). Q&A Implementing and maintaining web-based groupware.33, 23, June 7, p. 105.
5.
CooperR.G., & KleinschmidtE.J. (1993) Screening new products for potential winners.Long Range Planning26, 6, 74–81.
6.
DavisL., & ToselandR.W. (1987). Group vs. individual decision-making: an experimental analysis.Social Work With Groups10, 95–110.
7.
DennisA.. (1996) Groupware on the web.Proceedings of the Tools and Methods for Business Engineering Conference, Washington DC, pp. 573–581.
8.
DennisA., PootheriS.K., & NatarajanV.L. (1998) Lessons from the early adopters of web groupware.Journal of Management Information Systems14, 4, 65–86.
9.
EilsL.C., & JohnR.S. (1980). A criterion validation of multiattribute utility analysis and of group communication strategy.Organisational Behavior and Human Performance25, 268–88.
FerrellW.R. (1990) Aggregation of judgments or judgments of aggregations? In: MorayN., FerrellW.R., & RouseW.B. (Eds.), Robotics, Control and Society Essays in Honor of Thomas B. Sheridan.New York: Taylor & Francis.
12.
FischhoffB.. (1982). Debiasing. In: KahnemanD., SlovicP., & TverskyA. (Eds.) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GigoneD., & HastieR.. (1993). The common knowledge effect: information sharing and group judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65, 959–74.
14.
LichtensteinS., FischhoffB., & PhillipsL.. (1982) Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980. In: KahnemanD., SlovicP., & TverskyA. (Eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
LinstoneH., & TuroffM.. (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications.London: Addison-Wesley.
16.
LockA.. (1987) Integrating Group Judgments in Subjective Forecasts. In: WrightG., & AytonP. (Eds.), Judgmental Forecasting.Chichester: Wiley.
17.
McGuireT., KieslerS., & SiegelJ.. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decisionmaking.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917–30.
MorganM.G., & HenrionM.. (1990). Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
MorwitzV.G., & SchmittleinD.. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: which ‘intenders’ actually buy?Journal of Marketing Research29, 391–405.
21.
NunamakerJ.F., DennisA.R., ValacickJ.S., VogelD.R., & GeorgeJ.F. (1991). Electronic meetings system to support group work.Communication of the ACM, 34, 40–61.
22.
OzerM.. (1999). A Survey of New Product Evaluation Models.Journal of Product Innovation Managements16, 1, 77–94.
23.
OzerM.. (1996) Pre-Production Market Assessment of Innovative Consumer Products. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation: The University of Pittsburgh.
PuttickH.. (1999) Britannica will not be Brought to Book After All.Evening News. August 4, p. 8.
26.
Reagan-CrincioneP., & RohrbaughJ.. (1992) Decision Conferencing: A Unique Approach to the Behavioral Aggregation of Expert Judgment. In: WrightGeorge, & BolgerFergus (Eds.) Expertise and Decision Support.New York: Plenum Press.
27.
RoweG.. (1992) Perspective on Expertise in the Aggregation of Judgments. In: WrightG., & BolgerF. (Eds.), Expertise and Decision Support.New York: Plenum Press.
28.
RoweG., WrightG., & BolderF.. (1991). Delphi: A Re-evaluation of Research and Theory.Technological Forecasting and Social Change39, 235–51.
SchmidtJ.B., & CalantoneR.J. (1998) Are Really New Products Harder to Shut Down?Journal of Product Innovation Management15, 2, 111–23.
31.
ShahS.. (1999) M&S Plans a Briefs Encounter on the Net.The Times London, July 27, p. 8.
32.
SproullL., & KieslerS.. (1986). Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organisational CommunicationManagement Science32, 1492512.
33.
StasserG., & TitusW.. (1987). Effects of Information Load and Percentage of Shared Information on the Dissemination of Unshared Information During Group Discussion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53, 81–93.
34.
Thal LarsenP.. (1999) Inchcape may Expand Internet Car Dealing Distributors. Floatation of online Service is Ruled-out at Present.Financial Times London, August 10, p. 16.
35.
ThieraufR.J. (1989). Group Decision Support System for Effective Decision-Making.New York: Quorum Books.
36.
UhligR.. (1999) Lottery may Take Internet Wagers.The Daily Telegraph London, July 30, p. 12.
37.
Van de VenA.H., & DelbecqA.L. (1971). Nominal versus Interacting Group Processes For Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness.Academic Management Journal14, 203–13.
38.
Von WinterfeldtD., & EdwardsW.. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research.New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
WallstenT.S., BudescuD.V., ErevI., & DiederichA.. (1997). Evaluating and Combining Subjective Probability Estimates.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making10, 243–68.
