DicksonJ.P., & MacLchlanD. L. (1996). Fax surveys: return patterns and comparison with mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 108–13.
4.
DownsP.E., & KerrJ. R. (1986). Recent evidence on the relationship between anonymity and response variables for mail surveys. Journal of Academy of Market Science, 14, 72–82.
5.
GlausiuszJ.A., & Yates-MercerP.A. (1990). Some impacts of electronic mail on information services. Journal of Information Science Principles & Practice, 16, 249–56.
6.
GreenleafE. A. (1992). Improving rating scale measures by detecting and correcting bias components in some response styles. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 176–88.
7.
HelsonH. (1964). Adaptation level theory: an experimental and systematic approach to behaviour.New York: Harper & Row.
8.
HirschD. A. (1993). First-class electronic mail. Law Practice Management, 19, 45–8.
9.
HoustonM. J., & FordN.M. (1976). Broadening the scope of methodological research in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 397–403.
10.
KazuakiK. (1990). Recent developments and future trends in marketing research in Japan using new electronic media. Journal of Advertising Research, 30, 53–7.
KuzelaL. (1987). Electronic mail's surge: employees get the message immediately. Industry Week, 233, 53.
13.
McDanielS.W., & RaoC. P. (1981). An investigation of respondent anonymity's effect on mailed questionnaire response rate and quality. Journal of the Market Research Societ y, 23, 3, 150–60.
14.
McKeeD. O. (1992). The effect of using questionnaire identification code and message about non-response follow-up plans on mail survey response characteristics. Journal of the Market Research Society, 34, 179–91.
15.
ParkerL. (1992). Collecting data the e-mail way. Training and Development, pp. 52–4.
16.
ResnickR. (1994). Hitching a ride into cyberspace. Nation's Business, pp. 66–8.
17.
SchindlerP. S. (1986). Colour and contrast in magazine advertising. Psychology and Marketing, 3, 69–78.
18.
SchuldtB.A., & TottenJ. W. (1994). Electronic mail vs. mail survey response rates. Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management, 6, 36–9.
19.
SkidgellA.C., WitryolS. L., & WirzbickiP. J. (1976). The effect of novelty: familiarity levels on material reward preference of first-grade children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 33, 291–97.
20.
SmockC.D., & HoltB. G. (1962). Children's reactions to novelty: an experimental study of curiosity motivation. Child Development, 33, 631–42.
21.
TreismanA., & GormicanS. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetrics. Psychological Review, 95, 15–47.
22.
TseA., et al. (1994). A comparison of the effectiveness of mail and facsimile as survey media on response rate, speed and quality. Journal of the Market Research Society, 36, 349–55.
23.
TseA., et al. (1995). Comparing two methods of sending questionnaires: e-mail vs. mail. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 441–6.