AndersonS P., de PalmaA., & ThisseJ-F. (1992). Discrete choice theory of product differentiation.Cambridge, AAA: MIT Press.
3.
BaltasG., DoyleP., & DysonP. (1997). A model of consumer choice for national vs. store brands. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48, 988–95.
4.
Ben-AkivaM., & LermanS. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to predict travel demand.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
BrownstoneD., & TrainK. (1996). Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
6.
BuckleyP. G. (1988). Nested multinomial logit analysis for a hierarchical choice model. Journal of Business Research, 17, pp. 133–154.
7.
BucklinR.E., & GuptaI.S. (1992). Brand choice, purchase incidence and segmentation: an integrated modeling approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 201–15.
8.
BucklinR.E., & LattinJ.M. (1991). A two-stage model of purchase incidence and brand choice. Marketing Science, 10, 24–39.
9.
ChiangJ. (1991). A simultaneous approach to the whether, what and how much to buy questions. Marketing Science, 10, 297–315.
10.
ChintaguntaP. K. (1993). Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions. Marketing Science, 12, 184–208.
11.
DeatonA., & MuellbauerJ. (1980). Economics and consumer behaviour.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DubinJ. A. (1986). A nested logit model of space and water heat system choice. Marketing Science, 5, pp. 112–124.
GreeneW. H. (1997). Econometric analysis.New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
15.
GaudagniP.M., & LittleJ.D. (1983). A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science, 2, 203–38.
16.
GuptaS. (1988). Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 342–55.
17.
HausmanJ.A., LeonardG.K., & McFaddenD. (1995). A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model. Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage. Journal of Public Economics, 56, 1–30.
JainC.J., VilcassimN.F., & ChintaguntaP.K. (1994). A random coefficients logit brand-choice model applied to panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 12, 317–28.
20.
KamakuraW.A., KimB-D., & LeeJ. (1996). Modelling preference and structural heterogeneity in consumer choice. Marketing Science, 15, 152–72.
21.
KannanP K., & WrightG.P. (1991). Modeling and testing structured markets: a nested logit approach. Marketing Science, 10, 58–82.
22.
KrishnamurthiL., & RajS.P. (1988). A model of brand choice and purchase quantity price sensitivities. Marketing Science, 7, 1–20.
23.
MaddalaG. S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
McFaddenD. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: ZaremkaP. (Ed.). Frontiers in econometrics.New York: Academic Press.
25.
McFaddenD. (1980). Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. Journal of Business, 53, 513–29.
26.
McFaddenD. (1981). Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In: ManskiCharles F., & McFaddenDaniel (Eds.). Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications.Cambridge: MIT Press.
27.
McFaddenD. (1984). Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. In: Vol. II, GrilichesZ., & IntriligatorM. D. (Eds.). Handbook of econometrics.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier
28.
McFaddenD. (1986). The choice theory approach to market research. Marketing Science, 5, 275–97.
29.
TellisG. J. (1988). Advertising exposure, loyalty and brand purchase: a two-stage model of choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 134–44.
30.
ThomasR. L. (1987). Applied demand analysis.Essex: Longman.