Ratings-Based versus Choice-Based Latent Class Conjoint Models

Alba D.A. , & Hutchinson J.W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–54.

Allenby G. M. , & Ginter J.L. (1995). Using extremes to design products and segment markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 392–403.

Bettman J. R. (1982). A functional analysis of overall evaluations of alternatives in choice processes. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 87–93.

Billings R.S. , & Scherer L.L. (1988). The effects of response mode and importance on decision-making strategies: judgement and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 1–19.

Bozdogan H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–70.

Desarbo W.S. , Wedel M. , Vriens M. , & Ramaswamy V. (1992). Latent class metric conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 3, 273–89.

Desarbo W.S. , Ramaswami V. , & Cohen S.H. (1995). Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 6, 2, 137–47.

Elrod T. , Louviere J.J. , & Davey K.S. (1992). An empirical comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint models. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 368–77.

Finkbeiner C. T. (1988). Comparison of conjoint simulators. In: Johnson R. M. (Ed.) Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis and Computer Interviewing. Sun Valley, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Green P.E. , & Helsen K. (1989). Cross-validation assessment of alternatives to individual-level conjoint analysis: a case study. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 346–50.

Green P.E. , Krieger A.M. , & Agarwal L.M.K. (1993). A cross-validation test of four models of quantifying multiattribute preferences. Marketing Letters, 4, 369–80.

Green P.E. , Krieger A.M. , & Schaffer C.M. (1993). An empirical test of optimal weighting in conjoint analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 345–51.

Green P.E. , & Srinivasan V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing research: new developments and directions. Journal of Marketing, 54, 3–19.

Horowitz J.L. , & Louviere J.J. (1993). Testing predicted choices against observations in probabilistic choice models. Marketing Science, 12, 270–79.

Huber J. , Wittink D.R. , Fiedler J.A. , & Miller R.L. (1993). The effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation procedures in predicting choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 105–14.

Huber J. , Wittink D.R. , Johnson R.M. , & Miller R. (1992). Learning effects in preference tasks: choice-based versus standard conjoint. Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference.

Johnson R. M. (1985). Adaptive conjoint analysis. Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing. Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software Inc.

Loosschilder G. , Rosbergen E. , Vriens M. , & Wittink D.R. (1995). Pictorial stimuli in conjoint analysis to support product styling decisions. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 17–34.

Louviere J. J. (1988). Conjoint analysis modelling of stated preferences: a review of theory, methods, recent developments and external validity. Journal of Transportation Economics and Policy, 22, 93–121.

Louviere J.J. , Fox M.F. , & Moore W.L. (1993). Cross-task validity comparisons of stated preference choice models. Marketing Letters, 205–213.

Louviere J.J. , & Gaeth G.J. (1988). A comparison of rating and choice responses in conjoint tasks. Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference. Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Montgomery H. , Slart M. , Garling T. , & Lindberg E. (1994). The judgement-choice discrepancy: noncompatability or restructuring? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 145–55.

Montgomery D.B. , & Wittink D.R. (1980). The predictive validity of trade-off analysis for alternative aggregation schemes. In: Montgomery D.B. , & Wittink D.R. (Eds.) Market measurement and analysis. Proceedings of the ORSA/TIMS Special Interest Conference. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

Moore W.L. , Gray-Lee J. , & Louviere J.J. (1998). A cross-validity comparison of conjoint analysis and choice models at different levels of aggregation. Marketing Letters, forthcoming.

Oliphant K. , Eagle T.G. , Louviere J.J. , & Anderson D. (1992). Crosstask comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint. In: Metegrano M. (Ed.) Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference.

Oppewal H. (1995). A review of choice-based conjoint software: CBC and MINT. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2, 259–64.

Orme B.K. , Alport M.I. , & Christensen E. (1997). Assessing the validity of conjoint analysis - continued. Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference. Sequim, Washington, USA.

Schkade D.A. , & Johnson E.J. (1989). Cognitive processes in preference reversals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 203–31.

Swait J. , & Louviere J.J. (1993). The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 305–14.

Tversky A. , Slovic P. , & Sattath S. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgement and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 3, 371–84.

Vriens M. (1995). Conjoint analysis in marketing: developments in stimulus representation and segmentation methods. Ridderkerk, The Netherlands: Ridderprint.

Vriens M. , Loosschilder G.H. , Rosbergen E. , & Wittink D.R. (1998). Verbal versus realistic pictorial representations in conjoint analysis with design attributes. Journal of Product innovation Management, forthcoming.

Vriens M. , Wedel M. , & Wilms T. (1996). Metric conjoint segmentation methods: a Monte Carlo comparison. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 73–85.

Wittink D.R. , Vriens M. , & Burhenne W. (1994). Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: results and critical reflections. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 41–52.