AMSO (1991). TV-am target group ratings, Research Effectiveness Awards Ch. 8.
2.
AntoineJ., & SantiniG. (1986). An experiment to validate fusion files obtained by the referential factorial method. ESOMAR Broadcast Research Seminar, Helsinki.
3.
AntoineJ., & SantiniG. (1987). Fusion techniques: alternative to single-source methods. European Research, August.
4.
BakerK., HarrisP., & O'BrienJ. (1989) Data fusion: an appraisal and experimental evaluation. Journal of the Market Research Society, 31, 2, pp. 153–212.
5.
BuckS.F., SherwoodR., & TwymanA. (1975). Panels and the measurement of changes. Proceedings of the ESOMAR Congress.
6.
BuckS.F., & YatesA. (1986). Single source data: the new reality. ESOMAR Seminar: New Developments in Media Research, Helsinki.
7.
BronnerF. (1989). The end of fusion fear. AGB Seminar, London.
8.
BrownM. (1991). Enhancing media survey value through data fusion. Proceedings of the ESOMAR Congress.
9.
BuckS. F. (1997). The case for more panel beating. Admap, June.
10.
CannonH.M., & SeamonsB.L. (1995). Simulating single source data: how it fails us just when we need it most. Journal of Advertising Research, pp. 53–62.
11.
ClemensJ. (1989). The marriage of BARB and G-Track: a data fusion case study - the case for divorce!Admap, December.
12.
CornishP. (1995). Confusion by fusion. Admap, February.
13.
DarkowM. (1996). Compatible or not? Results of a single source field experiment within a TV audience research panel. Marketing and Research Today, August.
14.
EhrenbergA.S.C., & UncleM.D. (1997). Dirichlet-type markets: a review (Parts I & II). School of Marketing Working Paper Series. OMWT Series, University of New South Wales. 97/1.
15.
GoelP. K., & RamalingamT. (1989). The matching methodology: some statistical properties.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
16.
GusfieldD., & IrvingR.W. (1989). The stable marriage problem: structure and algorithms.Cambridge: The MIT Press.
17.
HeltonA. S. (1997). The information paradox - what researchers must do to be relevant in 2001. ESOMAR Seminar: Fit for the Global Future, Lisbon.
18.
KamakuraW.A., & WedelM. (1997). Statistical data fusion for cross-tabulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 485–98.
19.
KassG. V. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Applied Statistics, 29, 2, 119–27.
20.
LittleR.J.A., & RubinD. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data.Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
MadigsonJ. (1993). SPSS CHAID 6. 0.
22.
O'BrienS. (1991). The role of data fusion in actionable media targeting in the 1990s. Marketing and Research Today, February.
23.
PeppersD., & RogersM. (1996). The one to one future: building relationships one customer at a time.New York: Currency/Doubleday.
24.
PiocheA. (1992). How single source data can give some valuable indications on how to fix the marketing mix. ESOMAR Seminar: Media research meets the future. Lisbon.
25.
PuliyelT., PillaiS., & SinhaA. (1991). Making data sets compatible for data fusion: results of an Indian experiment. Fifth Worldwide Readership Symposium, Hong Kong.
26.
RadnerD.B., RichA., GonzalesM.E., JabineT. B., & MullerH. J. (1980). Report on exact and statistical matching techniques. Statistical Policy Working Paper, No. 5.
27.
RobertsA. (1994). Media exposure and consumer purchasing: an Unproved data fusion technique. Marketing and Research Today, August.
28.
RodgersW. L. (1984). An evaluation of statistical matching. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2, 1.
29.
RothmanJ. (1988). Testing data fusion. ESOMAR Seminar. Media and media research: How far can we go?
30.
RubinD. B. (1986). Statistical matching using file concatenation with adjusted weights and multiple imputations. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 4, pp. 87–94.
31.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys.Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
RubinD. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 434, 473–89.
33.
SimsC. A. (1972). Rejoinder. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 1, 3, 355–7.
34.
SinghA.C., MantelH.J., KinackM.D., & RoweG. (1993). Statistical matching: use of auxiliary information as an alternative to the conditional independence assumption. Survey Methodology, 191, 59–79.
35.
VenablesW.N., & RipleyB.D. (1994). Modern applied statisticswith S-Plus. New York: Springer-Verlag.
36.
WiegendJ. (1986). Combining different media surveys: the German partnership model and fusion experiments. Journal of the Market Research Society, 28, 2, 189–208.
37.
WyndhamJ., & GooseyG.R. (1990). Efficiency of media fusion and single source data collection in advertising evaluation. Proceedings of the ESOMAR Congress, Monte Carlo.