The Scope for Reducing Refusals in Household Surveys: An Investigation Based on Transcripts of tape-recorded Doorstep Interactions

Abstract

The paper analysis focuses on the extent to which there is scope for reducing rates of refusal on large-scale household surveys below current standard levels. Our data consisted of over 300 tape-recorded doorstep interactions, drawn from substantive surveys at two different organisations. Tape-recorded interactions were classified in terms of the degree of reluctance expressed by the respondent and the consequent scope for the interviewer to deploy interpersonal skills and persuasion. Interactions where there was both reluctance and scope for persuasion were classified according to whether they resulted in co-operation or refusal and the interviewer tactics associated with the two types of outcome were compared. Conclusions are drawn about the prevalence of different types of interaction and the scope for reducing refusal rates through training interviews to use techniques likely to minimise refusals on the doorstep.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campanelli

, Sturgis

, & Purdon

(1997). Can you hear me knocking: an investigation into the impact of interviewers on survey response rates. London: SCPR.

Colombo

(1983). Patterns of non-response. In: Hoinville

(Ed.), SSRCSurvey Methods Seminar Series, 1980–83, London: SCPR.

Couper

(1995). The impact of survey introductions on data quality. Paper presented at the International Conference on Survey Measurement and Process Quality, Bristol, UK.

Couper

, & Groves

(1991). The role of the interviewer in survey participation. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, Arizona.

Couper

, & Groves

(1996). Introductory interactions in telephone surveys and non-response. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Dijkstra

, & van der Zouwen

(1982). Response behaviour in the survey interview. London: Academic Press Inc.

Dillman

, Gallegos

, & Frey

(1976). Reducing refusal rates for telephone interviews. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 66–78.

Durbin

, & Stuart

(1951). Differences in response rates of experienced and inexperienced interviewers. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, pp 114.

Fowler

, & Mangione

(1990). Standardized survey interviewing. Newbury Park, California: Sage.

10.

Groves

, Cialdini

, & Couper

(1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 4, 475–95.

11.

Hyman

(1954–1975). Interviewing in social research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

12.

Kahn

, & Cannell

(1957). The dynamics of interviewing. New York: Wiley.

13.

Lievesley

(1986). Unit non-response in interview surveys. JCSM unpublished paper, London: SCPR.

14.

Morton-Williams

(1993). Interviewer approaches. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited.

15.

Morton-Williams

, & Young

(1986). Interviewer strategies on the doorstep. Proceeding of The Market Research Society Conference.

16.

Morton-Williams

, & Young

(1987). Obtaining the survey interview: an analysis of tape recorded doorstep introductions. Joumal of the Market Research Society, 29, 1.

17.

Oksenberg

, Coleman

, & Cannell

(1986). Interviewer voices and refusal rates in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 97–111.

18.

O'Neil

(1980). Telephone interview introductions and refusal rates: experiments in increasing respondent cooperation. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research M et hods.

19.

Singer

, & Kohnke-Aguirre

(1979). Interviewer expectation effects: a replication and extension. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 2, 245–60.

20.

Sudman

, & Bradburn

(1974). Response effects in surveys. Chicago: Aldine.