BradleyM., KnightI., & KellyM. (1996). Collecting qualifications data in sample surveys: a review of methods used in Government surveys. DfEE Research Series no. 10.
2.
CampanelliP. C. (1996). The conceptualisation of qualifications by individuals. DfEE Research Series no.9.
3.
CourtenayG., & McAleeseI. (1994). England and Wales Youth Cohort Study. Report on Cohort 4, Sweep 1. 16–17 year olds in 1989.ED Research Series. Youth Cohort Report No.21.
4.
DillmanD. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, pp. 17 and 225–49.
5.
DillmanD.A., ClarkJ.R., & SinclairM.D. (1995). How pre-notice letters, stamped return envelopes and reminder postcards affect mailback response rates for census questionnaires. Survey Methodology December 21, 2.
6.
DuncanW. J. (1979) Mail questionnaires in survey research: a review of response inducement techniques. Journal of Management, 5, 11, 39–55.
7.
FoxR.J., CraskM.R., & KimJ. (1988). Mail survey response rate: a meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 467–91.
8.
HarveyL. (1987). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a comprehensive literature review. Journal of the Market Research Society, 29, 3, 342–53.
9.
HeberleinT.A., & Baumgartner (1979). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43, 447–62.
10.
LinskyA. S. (1975). Stimulating responses to mailed questionnaires: a review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, 82–101.
11.
LynnP., PurdonS., HedgesB., & McAleeseI. (1994). England and Wales Youth Cohort Study. An assessment of alternative weighting strategies. ED Research Series. Youth Cohort Report No.30.
12.
SchlegelmilchB.B., & DiamantopoulosA. (1991). Prenotification and mail survey response rates: a quantitative integration of the literature. Journal of the Market Research Society.33, 3, pp. 243–255.
13.
ScottC. (1961). Research on mail surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 124, 2, pp. 143–205.
14.
TaylorS., & LynnP. (1996). England and Wales Youth Cohort Study I. An effect of time between contacts, questionnaire length, personalisation and other factors on response to the YCS. DfEE Research Studies Series RS8. The Stationery Office.