The SERVQUAL scale has been widely used by both academics and practising managers to measure service quality, but recent research has raised concerns about the reliability of SERVQUAL. Using the test-retest correlation method, this paper assesses short and long range stability of SERVQUAL. The results indicate that the SERVQUAL scale is not stable over time as revealed by the insignificant correlation between the test scores and retest scores. Although items in the expectation battery of the SERVQUAL scale remain fairly stable over time, the performance items are subject to instability even in a one-week test-retest interval. These results seem to cast doubt on the usefulness of using SERVQUAL performance items to measure service quality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BabakusE.Measuring service quality in the public utilities: the case of electric, gas and water services. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing1, 1 (1993): 33–49.
2.
BabakusE., & BollerG. W.An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business Research24 (1992): 253–268.
3.
BabakusE., & InhofeM. (1991). The role of expectations and attribute importance in the measurement of service quality. In: Proceedings of the Summer Educators Conference.Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp 142–144.
4.
BeardenW. O., NetemeyerR. G., & TeelJ. E.Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research15 (1989): 473–481.
5.
BeattyS. E., & KahleL. R.Alternative hierarchies of the attitude-behavior relationship: the impact of brand commitment and habit. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science16 (1988): 1–10.
6.
BoltonR. N., & DrewJ. H.A multistage model of customers assessments of service quality and value. Journal of Consumer Research17 (1991): 375–384.
7.
BoumanM., & van der WieleT.Measuring service quality in the car service industry: building and testing an instrument. International Journal of Service Industry Management3, 4 (1992): 4–16.
8.
BrownT. J., ChurchillG. A.Jr., & PeterJ. P.Improving the measurement of service quality. Journal of Retailing69, 1 (1993): 127–139.
9.
ButtleF.SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing30, 1 (1996): 8–32.
10.
CarmanJ. M.Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing66, 1 (1990): 33–55.
11.
CarminesE. G., & ZellerR. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
12.
ChurchillG. A.Jr.Better measurement practices are critical to better understanding of sales management issues. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management12, 2 (1992): 73–80.
13.
ClowK. E., & VorhiesD. W.Building a competitive advantage for service firms. Journal of Services Marketing7, 1 (1993): 22–32.
14.
CroninJ. J., & TaylorS. A.Measuring service quality: a re-examination and extension. Journal of Marketing56, 3 (1992): 56–68.
15.
CroninJ. J., & TaylorS. A.SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing58 (1994): 125–131.
16.
FickG. R., & RitchieJ. R. B.Measuring service quality in the travel and tourism industry. Journal of Travel Research30, 2 (1991): 2–9.
17.
GrnroosC.A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing18, 4 (1984): 36–44.
18.
GrnroosC. (1993). Toward a third phase in service quality research: challenges and future directions. In: SwartzT. A., BowenD. E., & BrownS. W. (Eds.), Advances rn Services Marketing and Management: Research and Practice, 2.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp 49–64.
19.
HendricksonA. R., GlorfeldK., & CronanT. P.On the repeated test-retest reliability of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument: a comment. Decision Sciences25, 4 (1994): 655–667.
20.
HendricksonA. R., MasseyP. D., & CronanT. P.On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly (1993): 227–230.
21.
KettingerW. J., & LeeC. C.Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function. Decision Sciences25, 5 (1994): 737–766.
22.
KlineP. (1993). Psychometric theory and method.London: Routledge.
23.
KwanW., & TanJ. H.Measuring service quality in Singapore retail banking: a gap analysis and segmentation approach. Singapore Management Review16, 2 (1994): 1–24.
24.
LamS. S. K.Measuring service quality: an empirical analysis in Hong Kong. International Journal of Management12, 2 (1995): 182–188.
25.
LewisB. R. (1996). Customer care in services. In: OlsenM. D., TeareR., & GummessonF. (Eds), Service quality in. hospitality organisations.London: Cassell, pp 57–88.
26.
LewisB. R.Defining and measuring the quality of customer service. Marketing Intelligence & Planning8, 6 (1990): 11–17.
27.
MalhotraN. K.A scale to measure self-concepts, person concepts, and product concepts. Journal of Marketing Research18 (1981): 456–464.
28.
MalhotraN. K. (1993). Marketing research: an applied orientation.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
29.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory.New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
OberoiU., & HalesC.Assessing the quality of the conference hotel service product: towards an empirically based model. Service Industries Journal10, 4 (1990): 700–721.
31.
OliverR. L.Processing of the satisfaction response in consumption: a suggested framework and research propositions. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaint Behavior2 (1989): 1–16.
32.
ParasuramanA., ZeitamlV. A., & BerryL. L.A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing49 (1985): 41–50.
33.
ParasuramanA., ZeitamlV. A., & BerryL. L.SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing64, 1 (1988): 12–40.
34.
ParasuramanA., ZeitamlV. A., & BerryL. L.Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing67, 4 (1991): 420–450.
35.
ParasuramanA., ZeitamlV. A., & BerryL. L.Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: implications for further research. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1994): 111–124.
36.
PrakashV.Validity and reliability of the confirmation of expectations paradigm as a determinant of consumer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science12, 4 (1984): 63–76.
37.
PrakashV., & LounsburyJ. W.The role of expectations in the determination of consumer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science12, 3 (1984): 1–17.
38.
ReidenbachR. F., & Sandifer-SmallwoodB.Exploring perceptions of hospital operations by a modified SERVQUAL approach. Journal of Health Care Marketing10, 4 (1990): 47–55.
39.
RichinsM. L.An analysis of consumer interaction styles in the market-place. Journal of Consumer Research10, 73–82.
40.
SalehF., & RyanC.Analysing service quality in the hospitality industry using the SERVQUAL model. Service Industries Journal11, 3 (1991): 324–343.
41.
SamsonD., & ParkerR.Service quality: the gap in the Australian consulting engineering industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management11, 7 (1994): 60–76.
42.
ShimpT. A., & BeardenW. O.Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers risk perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research9 (1982): 38–46.
43.
ShimpT. A., & SharmaS.Consumer ethnocentrism: construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research24, 280–289.
44.
SmithA. M., Measuring service quality: is SERVQUAL now redundant?Journal of Marketing Management11 (1995): 257–276.
45.
SoutarG. N., McNeilM. M., & LimK.Service quality and the overseas student: some Australian experiencesAsia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics6, 1 (1994): 28–40.
46.
TaylorS. A. (1995). Service quality and consumer attitudes: reconciling theory and measurement. In: SwartzT. A., BowenD. E., & BrownS. W. (Eds.), Advances in Services Marketing and Management: Research and Practice, 4.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1–36.
47.
TeasR. K.Expectations, performance evaluation, and consumers perceptions of quality. Journal of Marketing57 (1993): 18–34.
48.
TeasR. K.Expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: an assessment of a reassessment. Journal of Marketing58 (1994): 132–139.
49.
TorkzadehG., & DollW.Test-retest reliability of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. Decision Sciences22 (1991): 26–37.
50.
TorkzadehG., & DollW.The test-retest reliability of user involvement instruments. Information & Management26 (1994): 21–31.
51.
VandammeR., & LeunisJ.Development of a multiple-item scale for measuring hospital service quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management4, 3 (1993): 30–49.
52.
ZinkhanG., & BurtonS.An examination of three multidimensional profiles for assessing consumer reactions to advertisements. Journal of Advertising18, 4 (1989): 6–14.<
