AbrahamsonR. A. (ed.) (1994). The third Sector directory: the donors guide to fund raising organizations in Canada.Fifth Edition. Toronto: Third Sector Publishing.
2.
ArmstrongJ. S. (1975). Monetary incentives in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, 112–16.
3.
BachmannD. P. (1987). Cover letter appeals and sponsorship effects on mail survey response rates. Journal of Marketing Education, 9, 45–51.
4.
BensonP.L., & CattV.L. (1978). Soliciting charity contributions: the parlance of asking for money. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 84–95.
5.
BruvoldN.T., & ComerJ.M. (1988). A model for estimating the response rate to a mailed survey. Journal of Business Research, 16, 101–16.
6.
BruvoldN.T., ComerJ.M., & RospertAM. (1990). Interactive effects of major response facilitators. Decision Sciences, 21, 551–61.
7.
ChildersT.L., PrideW., & FerrelO.C. (1980). A reassessment of the effects of appeals on response to mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 365–70.
8.
ChurchA. H. (1993). Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: a meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 62–79.
9.
DickinsonJ. R. (1990). The bibliography of marketing research methods.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
10.
FariaA.J., & DickinsonJ.R. (1992). Mail survey response, speed, and cost. Industrial Marketing Management, 21, 51–60.
11.
FurseD.H., & StewertD.W. (1984). Manipulating dissonance to improve mail survey response. Psychology and Marketing, 1, 79–94.
12.
FurseD.H., & StewertD.W. (1982). Monetary incentives versus promised contribution to charity: new evidence on mail survey response. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 375–80.
13.
GoyderJ. (1985). Face-to-face interviews and mailed questionnaires: the net difference in response rate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 234–52.
14.
HarveyL. (1987). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a comprehensive literature review. Journal of the Market Research Society, 29, 341–53.
15.
HubbardR., & LittleE.L. (1988). Promised contributions to charity and mail survey responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 223–30.
16.
JobberD. (1986). Improving response rates in industrial mail surveys. Industrial Marketing Management, 15, 183–95.
17.
JonesW.H., & LangJ.R. (1980). Sample composition bias and response bias in a mail survey: a comparison of inducement methods. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 69–76.
18.
LunneyG. H. (1970). Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: an empirical study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 263–9.
19.
MartinW., DuncanJ., PowersT., & SawyerJ. (1989). Costs and benefits of selected response inducement techniques in mail survey research. Journal of Business Research, 19, 67–79.
20.
RieszP.C., BuellI., & RiglerS. (1980). Altruistic versus egoistic cover letter appeals: a field experiment. In: BernhardtKenneth (Eds.), The changing marketing environment.Chicago: American Marketing Association Summer Educators Proceedings, pp. 334–5.
21.
RobertsonD.H., & BellengerD.N. (1978). A new method of increasing mail survey responses: contributions to charity. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 632–3.
22.
SchlegelmilchB.B., & DiamantopoulasA. (1991). Prenotification and mail survey response rates: a quantitative integration of the literature. Journal of the Market Research Society, 33, 243–55.
23.
WechasaraG., MotesW.H., & BoyaU.O. (1987). Examining the effects of positive social labeling, time, and request sizes on compliance in a multistage marketing survey context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15, 15–21.
24.
YammarinoF.J., SkinnerS., & ChildersT. (1991). Understanding mail survey response behavior: a meta analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 613–39.
25.
YuJ., & CooperH. (1983). A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 36–44.