ALRECKP, & SETTLER (1985). The survey research handbook.Homewood, Illinois: Richard D Irwin, Inc.
2.
ANDERSONJ, & NARUSJ (1984). A model of the distributor's perspective of distributor –manufacturer working relationship.Journal of Marketing48, Fall, 62–74.
3.
DICKINSONJ, & KIRZNERE (1982). An absence of bias in attribute preferences between early and total sample survey respondents.Proceedings of the 1982 Annual Meeting.Atlanta: Decision Sciences Institute. 278–280.
4.
DILLMAND (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The Total Design Method.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
DUHAND, & WILSONR (1990). Prenotification and industrial survey responses.Industrial Marketing Management20, 2, May, 95–105.
6.
DUNCANO, & DUNCANB (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indexes.American Sociological Review20, April, 210–217.
7.
DUNCANO (1961). Statistical geography.Glencoe, III: The Free Press.
8.
FRAZIERG, & SUMMERSJ (1984). Interfirm influence strategies and their applications within distribution channels.Journal of Marketing45, Summer, 48–55.
9.
GAJRAJA (1990). A comparison of the effect of promised and provided lotteries, monetary and gift incentives on mail survey response rate, speed and cost.Journal of the Market Research Society32, 1, 141–162.
10.
JOBBERD, & SAUNDERSJ (19891). The prediction of industrial mail-survey response rates.Journal of the Operational Research Society40, 10, October, 839–841.
11.
KAMINSM (1989). The enhancement of response rates to a mail survey through a labelled probe foot-in-the-door approach.Journal of the Market Research Society31, 2, 273–283.
12.
LIFTONL (ROBINSON) (1989). Rational firm behavior in response to environmental uncertainty: collective marketing activities in the New York State wine grape industry. Unpublished dissertation, Ithaca: Cornell University.
13.
NEWMANS (1962). Differences between early and late respondents to a mailed survey.Journal of Advertising Research2, June, 37–39.
14.
PARASURAMANA (1981). A comparison of ‘early’ vs. late’ respondents in mail surveys of commercial populations. In Proceedings, New Orleans: Southwestern Marketing Assoctation Conference.RossR (Eds), 239–242.
15.
TAYLORB, & ANDERSONA (1989). Mail survey incentives: the benefits of pretesting.Applied Market Research29, 3, Summer, 25–28.
16.
VORSTERH, & FRANKELL (1987). Are all those call-backs really necessary?Readership research: theory and practice, HenryH (Ed). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers By, 227–231.
17.
WARRENM (1989). Costs and benefits of selected response inducement techniques in mail survey research.Journal of Business Research19, 1, August, 67–79.
18.
WOLFEL (1979). Characteristics of persons with and without home telephones.Journal of Marketing Research16, August, 421–425.
19.
WUNDERG, & WYNNG (1988). Effects of address personalisation on mailed questionnaires response rate, time and quality.Journal of the Market Research Society30, 1, 95–101.