In this article we focus on the politician’s brand and how it develops in the voter’s mind. Specifically, we examine how priming a candidate’s image or issue traits influences how individuals update their beliefs about a candidate, and in what way the consistency of image traits and issue traits affects this evaluation. The results from a two-factor design (message: consistent vs. inconsistent) × (information order: image first vs. issue first) suggest that sequential dissemination of information about the candidate’s issue positions, followed by image information (consistent with the program or not) results in a more positive evaluation of the candidate.
AndersonJ. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition: Harvard University Press.
2.
BennettW. L. (1977). The ritualistic and pragmatic bases of political campaign discourse. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637709383384
3.
ChungS.FinkE. L.WaksL.MeffertM. F.XieX. (2012). Sequential information integration and belief trajectories: An experimental study using candidate evaluations. Communication Monographs, 79(2), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.673001
4.
CofféH.von SchoultzA. (2021). How candidate characteristics matter: Candidate profiles, political sophistication, and vote choice. Politics, 41(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720922077
CwalinaW.DrzewieckaM. (2022). How trust wins against criticism: Promise concept as a political branding tool. Lessons from Polish politics. In MoufahimM. (Ed.), Political branding in turbulent times (pp. 123–140): Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
CwalinaW.FalkowskiA. (2015). Political branding: Political candidates positioning based on inter-object associative affinity index. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1–2), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990842
8.
CwalinaW.FalkowskiA.NewmanB. I. (2011). Political marketing: Theoretical and strategic foundations. M.E. Sharpe.
9.
CwalinaW.FalkowskiA.NewmanB. I. (2015). Persuasion in the political context: Opportunities and threats. In StewartD. W. (Ed.), Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing (1, pp. 61–128): Praeger.
10.
CwalinaW.FalkowskiA.NewmanB. I. (2017). Political marketing: Theory and practice. In Jansson-BoydC. V.ZawiszaM. J. (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 273–291): Routledge.
11.
de ChernatonyL. (2001). From brand vision to brand evaluation: Butterworth Heinemann.
FalkowskiA.MichalakM. (2014). Backward framing and memory evaluation in political elections. Journal of Political Marketing, 13(1–2), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.866028
15.
FrenchA.SmithG. (2010). Measuring political brand equity: A consumer oriented approach. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 460–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011020534
16.
FunkC. L. (1999). Bringing the candidate into models of candidate evaluation. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 700–720. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647824
17.
GogginS. N. (2019). How quickly we selectively forget: Experimental tests of information order on memory and candidate evaluation. Political Psychology, 40(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12499
18.
HackerK. L.ZakahiW. R.GilesM. J.McQuittyS. (2000). Components of candidate images: Statistical analysis of the issue-persona dichotomy in the presidential campaign of 1996. Communication Monographs, 67(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376508
19.
HampsonS. E.JohnO. P.GoldbergL. R. (1986). Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.37
20.
HastieR.ParkB. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.93.3.258
21.
JacobsL. R.ShapiroR. Y. (1994). Issues, candidate image, and priming: The use of private polls in kennedy’s 1960 presidential campaign. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944793
22.
KellerK. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252054
23.
KimS. Y. (2009). Online processing, memory-based processing, and an integrated model of candidate evaluation: A simulation-based empirical investigation. Korean Journal of International Relations, 49(6), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2009.12.49.6.99
24.
KimS. Y.TaberC. S.LodgeM. (2010). A computational model of the citizen as motivated reasoner: Modeling the dynamics of the 2000 presidential election. Political Behavior, 32(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-009-9099-8
25.
KirklandP. A.CoppockA. (2018). Candidate choice without party labels:: New insights from conjoint survey experiments. Political Behavior, 40(3), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9414-8
26.
KotlerP. (1991). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control (7th ed.): Prentice-Hall.
27.
LaustsenL.PetersenM. B. (2020). Online tallies and the context of politics: How online tallies make dominant candidates appear competent in contexts of conflict. American Journal of Political Science, 64(2), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12490
28.
LodgeM. (1995). Toward a procedural model of candidate evaluation. In LodgeM.McGrawK. M. (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 111–139): University Of Michigan Press.
29.
LodgeM.McGrawK. M.StrohP. (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83(2), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962397
30.
LodgeM.SteenbergenM. R.BrauS. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082427
31.
LodgeM.StrohP. (1993). Inside the mental voting booth: An impression-driven process model of candidate evaluation. In IyengarS.McGuireW. J. (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 225–263): Duke University Press.
32.
LoudenA. (1994). Voter rationality and media excess: Image in the 1992 presidential campaign. In DentonR. E. (Ed.), The 1992 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 169–187): Praeger.
33.
MaassA.ColomboA.ColomboA.ShermanS. J. (2001). Inferring traits from behaviors versus behaviors from traits: The induction-deduction asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.391
MarvinC. (1994). Fresh blood, public meat: Rituals of totem regeneration in the 1992 presidential race. Communication Research, 21(3), 264–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021003002
36.
McGrawK. M.LodgeM.StrohP. (1990). On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue importance, and sophistication. Political Behavior, 12(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992331
37.
McGrawK. M.PinneyN.NeumannD. (1991). Memory for political actors: Contrasting the use of semantic and evaluative organizational strategies. Political Behavior, 13(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992295
38.
NewmanB. I. (1994). The marketing of the president: Political marketing as campaign strategy: Sage Publications.
39.
NewmanB. I.NewmanT. P. (2017). Brand: Kendall Hunt Publishing.
40.
ParkB. (1986). A method for studying the development of impressions of real people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 907–917. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.5.907
41.
PedersenR.DahlgaardJ. O.CitiM. (2019). Voter reactions to candidate background characteristics depend on candidate policy positions. Electoral Studies, 61, Article 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102066
RahnW. M.AldrichJ. H.BorgidaE. (1994). Individual and contextual variations in political candidate appraisal. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944891
44.
RapaportR. B.MetcalfK. L.HartmanJ. A. (1989). Candidate traits and voter inferences: An experimental study. The Journal of Politics, 51(4), 917–932.
45.
RuddR. (1986). Issues as image in political campaign commercials. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 50(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318609374216
SullivanJ. L.AldrichJ. H.BorgidaE.RahnW. (1990). Candidate appraisal and human nature: Man and superman in the 1984 election. Political Psychology, 11(3), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791660
50.
TetlockP. E. (1983). Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(4), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033716
