Ethical considerations are increasingly important because new online techniques of research such as online ethnography often have novel ethical challenges. Our research aims to help online ethnographers by providing a moral/philosophical framework to be used in making ethical decisions and guiding them to reflect on how these decisions affect and justify their methodological choices. We draw upon prior research on ethics and online ethnography, and utilize five key dimensions of moral and philosophical principles (autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, justice and trust, explicability) for our framework. Our research highlights essential ethical questions such as selecting a philosophical basis as your ethical frame and coming to terms with ambiguity, and related methodological guidelines such as avoiding personal prejudice, assumptions and bias, research site entry strategy, researcher’s communication with the participants, protection of data, research site exit strategy and communicating online research findings. This paper contributes to the existing literature by identifying how moral and philosophical guidelines impact our ethical and methodological choices when engaging in online ethnography and what this means in terms of research practice.
AguirreG.HymanM. (2015). Ethics in qualitative consumer research. In Qualitative Research Methods in Consumer Psychology. Psychology Press, 16-32.
2.
AllenN. J.,MeyerJ. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252–276. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043.
3.
BeauchampC. (2009). Beauchamp TL, childress JF principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BeauchampT. L.,ChildressJ. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. USA: Oxford University Press.
5.
BeauchampT. L.,ChildressJ. F. (2020). Response to commentaries. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 45(4–5), 560–579.
6.
BoellstorffT. (2012). Rethinking digital anthropology. Digital anthropology (pp. 39–60). NY: Routledge.
7.
BoellstorffT. (2020). The ability of place: Digital topographies of the virtual human on Ethnographia Island. Current Anthropology, 61(S21), S109–S122.
8.
BoellstorffT.NardiB.PearceC.,TaylorT. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
BrockD. W. (2008). Philosophical justifications of informed consent in research.
10.
BruckmanA. (2002). Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the internet. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021316409277.
11.
ConveryI.,CoxD. (2012). A review of research ethics in internet-based research. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 6(1), 50–57.
Fletcher-BrownJ.TurnbullS.VigliaG.ChenT.,PereiraV. (2020). Vulnerable consumer engagement: How corporate social media can facilitate the replenishment of depleted resources. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(2), 518–529. doi:https://org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.06.002.
14.
FloridiL.CowlsJ.BeltramettiM.ChatilaR.ChazerandP.DignumV.,VayenaE. (2018). AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds & Machines, 28, 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
15.
GolderS.AhmedS.NormanG.,BoothA. (2017). Attitudes toward the ethics of research using social media: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), e195.
16.
HairN.,ClarkM. (2007). The ethical dilemmas and challenges of ethnographic research in electronic communities. International Journal of Market Research, 49(6), 1–13.
17.
Harridge-MarchS.,QuintonS. (2010). Relationships in online communities: The potential for marketers. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 4(1), 59–73.
18.
HasseC.,SøndergaardD. M. (2019). Designing robots, designing humans. Oxon: Routledge.
19.
HudsonJ. M.,BruckmanA. (2004). Go away: Participant objections to being studied and the ethics of chatroom research. The Information Society, 20(2), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490423030.
20.
International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). (2018). ifrc org/en/who-we-are/ vision- -mission/. Accessed28 August 2018
21.
IzogoE. E.,JayawardhenaC. (2018). Online shopping experience in an emerging e-retailing market. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(2), 193–214.
22.
JensenL. X.BearmanM.BoudD.,KonradsenF. (2022). Digital ethnography in higher education teaching and learning—a methodological review. Higher Education, 84(3), 1–20.
23.
KantanenH.,ManninenJ. (2016). Hazy boundaries: Virtual communities and research ethics. Media and Communication, 4(4), 86–96.
24.
KawulichB. B.,D’AlbaA. (2019). Teaching qualitative research methods with Second Life, a 3-dimensional online virtual environment. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 375–384.
KozinetsR. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research. Los Angeles: SAGE.
27.
KozinetsR. V. (2001). Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meanings of star trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1086/321948.
28.
KozinetsR. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.
29.
KozinetsR. V. (2012). Marketing netnography: Prom/ot (ulgat) ing a new research method. Methodological Innovations Online, 7(1), 37–45.
30.
KozinetsR. V.De ValckK.WojnickiA. C.,WilnerS. J. S. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.71.
31.
KozinetsR. V.GershoffA. D. WhiteT. B. (2020). Introduction to special issue: Trust in doubt: Consuming in a post-truth world. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 5(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1086/708543.
32.
KozinetsR.ScarabotoD.ParmentierM. -A. (2018). Evolving netnography: How brand auto-netnography, a netnographic sensibility, and more-than-human netnography can transform your research. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(3-4), 231-242.
33.
KrasonikolakisI.,PouloudiN. (2015). 3D online environments: Ethical challenges for marketing research. Journal of Information, 13(3/4), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2014-0003.
34.
KunzT.LandesvatterC.,GummerT. (2020). Informed consent for paradata use in web surveys. International Journal of Market Research, 62(4), 396–408.
35.
LaFolletteH. (1991). The truth in ethical relativism. Journal of Social Philosophy, 22(1), 146–154.
36.
MastroianniA.,KahnJ. (2001). Swinging on the pendulum: Shifting views of justice in human subjects research. Hastings Center Report, 31(3), 21–28.
37.
MoisanderJ.,ValtonenA. (2006). Qualitative marketing research: A cultural approach. London, England: Sage.
38.
MoraesC. (2016). Consumers’ concerns with how they are researched online. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 36(1), 79–101.
39.
MoraisG. M.SantosV. F.,GonçalvesC. A. (2020). Netnography: Origins, foundations, evolution and axiological and methodological developments and trends. The Qualitative Report, 25(2), 441–455.
40.
MorrisM. W.LeungK.AmesD.,LickelB. (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy Of Management Review, 24(4), 781–796.
41.
NairnA.,ClarkeB. (2012). Researching children: Are we getting it right? A discussion of ethics. International Journal of Market Research, 54(2), 177–198.
42.
NunanD., (2020). Research priorities for data, market research, and insights. London, England: SAGE Publications Sage UK.
43.
NunanD.,Di DomenicoM. (2013). Market research and the ethics of big data. International Journal of Market Research, 55(4), 505–520.
44.
NunanD.,YeniciogluB. (2013). Informed, uninformed and participative consent in social media research. International Journal of Market Research, 55(6), 791–808.
45.
OwensC. (2017). Philosophical framework for identifying vulnerable consumers.
46.
PaccagnellaL. (1997). Getting the seats of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00065.x.
47.
ParisC.ColineauN.NepalS.BistaS. K.,BeschornerG. (2013). Ethical considerations in an online community: The balancing act. Ethics and Information Technology, 15(4), 301–316.
48.
RavoniarisonA.,BenitoC. (2019). Mobile games: Players’ experiences with in-app purchases. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(1), 62–78.
49.
ReidE.,DuffyK. (2018). A netnographic sensibility: Developing the netnographic/social listening boundaries. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(3–4), 263–286.
50.
RentelnA. D. (1988). Relativism and the search for human rights. American Anthropologist, 90(1), 56–72.
51.
ResnikD. B. (2018). The ethics of research with human subjects: Protecting people, advancing science, promoting trust (74). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
52.
RobertsL. D. (2015). Ethical issues in conducting qualitative research in online communities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 314–325.
53.
SereginaA., WeijoH. A. (2017). Play at any cost: How cosplayers produce and sustain their ludic communal consumption experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw077.
54.
StevensG.O’DonnellV. L.,WilliamsL. (2015). Public domain or private data? Developing an ethical approach to social media research in an inter-disciplinary project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(2), 154–167.
55.
ThompsonA.StringfellowL.MacleanM.,NazzalA. (2021). Ethical considerations and challenges for using digital ethnography to research vulnerable populations. Journal of Business Research, 124, 676–683.
56.
TimmonsM. (2002). Kant’s metaphysics of morals: Interpretative essays. Clarendon Press.
57.
TuikkaA.-M.NguyenC.,KimppaK. K. (2017). Ethical questions related to using netnography as research method. ORBIT Journal, 1(2), 2.
58.
TumbatG.,BelkR. W. (2011). Marketplace tensions in extraordinary experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1086/658220.
59.
Udo-AkangD. (2013). Ethical orientation for new and prospective researchers. American International Journal of Social Science, 2(1), 54–64.
60.
WallaceR.CostelloL.,DevineA. (2018). Netnographic slog: Creative elicitation strategies to encourage participation in an online community of practice for early education and care. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1609406918797796.
61.
WhalenE. A. (2018). Understanding a shifting methodology: A content analysis of the use of netnography in hospitality and tourism research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3423–3441.
62.
ZimmerM. (2010). But the data is already public: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5.
