Preference stability can be a useful and supportive indicator for making strategic and tactical marketing decisions as it can assist short- and longer-term choices regarding product/brand characteristics and attributes. We provide a measurement approach combined with a model for strategic product/brand development decisions and subsequent marketing actions. Managers could use such insights when contrasting different attributes (e.g., design vs. camera of mobile phones) and also when making decisions about characteristics (e.g., different degrees of camera resolution of mobile phones). Such insights shall guide managers on where to invest and on how to leverage consumer preferences more effectively to generate sales for the company. We illustrate the use of our model of preferences and preference stability of product characteristics in three complementary studies (assessing yoghurt, energy drinks, and mobile phones).
BermanS.KorstenP. (2010). Capitalizing on complexity. Global Chief Executive Officer Study, 76. IBM Institute for Business Value.
2.
BettmanJ. R.LuceM. F.PayneJ. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/209535.
3.
BrouwerR.LogarI.SheremetO. (2017). Choice consistency and preference stability in test-retests of discrete choice experiment and open-ended willingness to pay elicitation formats. Environ Resource Econ, 68(3), 729–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0045-z.
4.
ChernevA.BöckenholtU.GoodmanJ. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 333–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002.
5.
de Andrés CalleR.CascónJ. M.González-ArteagaT. (2020). Preferences stability: A measure of preferences changes over time. Decision Support Systems, 129, 113169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113169.
6.
DellaertB. G.BrazellJ. D.LouviereJ. J. (1999). The effect of attribute variation on consumer choice consistency. Marketing Letters, 10(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008088930464.
7.
DeShazoJ. R.FermoG. (2002). Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(1), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1199.
DolnicarS.RossiterJ. R. (2008). The low stability of brand-attribute associations is partly due to market research methodology. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(2), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.10.002.
10.
EarlP. E.WakeleyT. (2010). Economic perspectives on the development of complex products for increasingly demanding customers. Research Policy, 39(8), 1122–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.006.
11.
FraserI.BalcombeK.WilliamsL.McSorleyE. (2021). Preference stability in discrete choice experiments. Some evidence using eye-tracking. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 94, 101753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101753.
12.
HooleR. (2006). Drive complexity out of your supply chain. Supply Chain Strategy Newsletter. Harvard Business School Publishing.
13.
JaccardP. (1901). Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 37(142), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-266450.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ.ThalerR. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193.
16.
NetzerO.SrinivasanV. S. (2011). Adaptive self-explication of multi-attribute preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.1.140.
17.
NovemskyN.DharR.SchwartzN.SimonsonI. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.347.
18.
ParkY.DingM.RaoV. R. (2008). Eliciting preference for complex products: A web-based upgraded method. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(5), 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.5.562.
19.
RabinM. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal If Economic Literature, 36(1), 11–46.
20.
RigbyD.BurtonM.PluskeJ. (2016). Preference Stability and Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 65, 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9913-1.
ScholzS. W.MeissnerM.DeckerR. (2010). Measuring consumer preferences for complex products: A compositional approach based on paired comparisons. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.4.685.
23.
SchwartzB. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
ThompsonD. V.HamiltonR. W.RustR. T. (2005). Feature fatigue: When product capabilities become too much of a good thing. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.431.
