Internationalization seeks an understanding of the nature of the culture of the countries and is eventually influenced by affinity toward country and soft power (ideological and cultural influence). This research analyzed the influence of affinity toward country and soft power on the internationalization of cultural products. A survey was conducted with 478 Portuguese respondents of 22 cities about Brazilian cultural products, and data were analyzed by structural equations modeling. The results showed that soft power influenced positively the internationalization of cultural products and affinity toward country, and the latter also influenced positively internationalization. In addition to the methodological contribution due to the self-reporting approach used to analyze the internationalization of cultural products, this study contributes to identify the relationship between the constructs of internationalization of cultural products, affinity toward country, and soft power, in this way, the theoretical field related to international marketing and business, especially in a perspective focused on the consumption of cultural products.
CavusgilS. T.KnightG.RiesenbergerJ. R. (2010). International business: Strategy, management and the new realities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4.
DiamantopoulosA.SchlegelmilchB.PalihawadanaD. (2011). The relationship between country-of-origin image and brand image as drivers of purchase intentions: A test of alternative perspectives. International Marketing Review, 28, 508–524.
5.
DouglasS. P.CraigC. S. (2006). On improving the conceptual foundations of international marketing research. Journal of International Marketing, 14(1), 1–22.
6.
GarciaG. (2012). Internationalization of culture through traditional arts: A case of Japanese SMEs. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 30(1), 80–95.
7.
GrinshpunH. (2014). Deconstructing a global commodity: Coffee, culture, and consumption in Japan. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14, 343–364.
8.
HairJ. F.SarstedtM.RingleC. M.MenaJ. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 414–433.
9.
HairJ. F.Jr.HultG. T. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
HartzA.WatsonD. C.NoyesR.Jr. (2005). Applied study of affinities for personal attributes using an epidemiological model. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(7), 635–650.
11.
HermansH. J. M.KempenH. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53(10), 1111–1120.
12.
JaffeE. D.NebenzahlI. D. (2006). National image and competitive advantage: The theory and practice of place branding. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
13.
KhanN.BamberD.QuaziA. (2012). Relevant or redundant: Elite consumers’ perception of foreign-made products in an emerging market. Journal of Marketing Management, 28, 1190–1216.
14.
KogutB.SinghH. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 411–432.
15.
KraidyM. (2002). Globalization of culture through the media. In SchementJ. R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of communication and information (Vol. 2, pp. 359–363). New York, NY: Macmillan. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/325
16.
MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffP. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88, 542–555.
17.
McCloryJ. (2012) The new persuaders: An international ranking of soft power. Institute for Government. Available from www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
18.
McIntoshC. N.EdwardsJ. R.AntonakisJ. (2014). Reflections on partial least squares path modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 17, 210–251.
19.
MeulemanR.LubbersM.VerkuytenM. (2018). Parental socialization and the consumption of domestic films, books and music. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(1), 1–28.
20.
Ministry of Culture. (2011). Plano da Secretaria da Economia Criativa: políticas, diretrizes e ações. Brasília, Brazil: Author.
21.
Ministry of Culture. (2014). Site oficial do Ministério da Cultura, 2009. Available from http://www.cultura.gov.br/
22.
MossbergL.KleppeI. (2005). Country and destination image: Different or similar image concepts?Service Industries Journal, 25, 493–503.
23.
MoyaM.JainR. (2013). When tourists are your “friends”: Exploring the brand personality of México and Brazil on Facebook. Public Relations Review, 39, 23–29.
24.
NercoliniM. J. (2006). A Música Popular Brasileira repensa identidade e nação. Revista FAMECOS, 13(31), 125–132.
25.
NesE. B.YelkurR.SilkosetR. (2014). Consumer affinity for foreign countries: Construct development, buying behavior consequences and animosity contrasts. International Business Review, 23, 774–784.
26.
NunnN. (2007). Relationship-specificity, incomplete contracts, and the pattern of trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 569–600.
27.
NyeJ. S.Jr. (2004). Soft power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
28.
NyeJ. S.Jr. (2011). The future of power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
29.
ObereckerE. M.DiamantopoulosA. (2011). Consumers’ emotional bonds with foreign countries: Does consumer affinity affect behavioral intentions?Journal of International Marketing, 19(2), 45–72.
30.
ObereckerE. M.RieflerP.DiamantopoulosA. (2008). The consumer affinity construct: Conceptualization, qualitative investigation, and research agenda. Journal of International Marketing, 16(3), 23–56.
31.
ParttiH. (2014). Cosmopolitan musicianship under construction: Digital musicians illuminating emerging values in music education. International Journal of Music Education, 32(1), 3–18.
32.
Peng-ErL. (2004). Japan–Taiwan relations: Between affinity and reality. Asian Affairs, 30, 249–267.
33.
PieterseJ. N. (2009). Globalization and culture: Global mélange (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
34.
RibasJ. R.VieiraP. R. C. (2011). Multivariate analysis using SPSS. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Modern Science Publisher.
35.
RigdonE. E. (2012). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: In praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 341–358. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.010
36.
RothK.DiamantopoulosA. (2009). Advancing the country image construct. Journal of Business Research, 62, 726–740.
37.
RothK.DiamantopoulosA. (2010). Advancing the country image construct: Reply to Samiee’s (2009) commentary. Journal of Business Research, 63, 446–449.
38.
RoweW.SchellingV. (1991). Memory and modernity: Popular culture in Latin America. London: Verso.
39.
SilveiraF. G.ServantL. M.MenezesT.PiolaS. F. (2007). Spending and consumption of contemporary Brazilian families. Brasilia: IPEA.
40.
SpolaoreE.WacziargR. (2013). How deep are the roots of economic development?Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 325–369.
41.
StapletonL. M. (2009). An assessment of practical solutions for Structural Equation Modeling with complex sample data. Structural Equations Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 28–58. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1301_2
42.
Van EijckK. (2001). Social differentiation in musical taste patterns. Social Forces, 79, 1163–1185.
43.
VerleghP. W. J. (2007). Home country bias in product evaluation: The complementary roles of economic and socio-psychological motives. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(3), 361–373.
