Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

28 questioners to help buyers of online samples https://ana.esomar.org/document/2666?query=Online%20research%20guidelines

Aust

Diedenhofen

Ullrich

Musch

(2013). Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), pp.527-535.

AAPOR Report on non-probability sampling, https://www.aapor.org/Education-Resources/Reports/Non-Probability-Sampling.aspx

AAPOR report on evaluating survey quality in today’s complex environment https://www.aapor.org/Education-Resources/Reports/Evaluating-Survey-Quality.aspx

Bansal

H.S.

Eldridge

Halder

Knowles

Murray

Sehmer

Turner

(2017). Shorter interviews, longer surveys: Optimising the survey participant experience while accommodating ever expanding client demands. International Journal of Market Research, 59(2), pp.221-238.

Barnette

J.J.

(1999). Nonattending respondent effects on interval consistency of self-administered surveys: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), pp.38-46.

Bollen

K.A.

Arminger

(1991). Observational residuals in factor analysis and structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 21, pp.235-262.

Brosnan

Babakhani

Dolnicar

(2019). “I know what you’re going to ask me”: Why respondents don’t read survey questions. International Journal of Market Research. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1470785318821025?journalCode=mrea [Assessed 15 May 2019].

Casler

Bickel

Hackett

(2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), pp.2156-2160.

10.

Dillman

D.A.

Smyth

J.D.

Christian

L.M.

(2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

11.

Dodou

de Winter

J. C.

(2014). Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, pp.487-495.

12.

Dolnicar

Grün

Yanamandram

(2013). Dynamic, interactive survey questions can increase survey data quality. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(7), pp.690-699.

13.

ESOMAR guideline for online research https://ana.esomar.org/document/2724?query=Online%20research%20guidelinesh.

14.

ESOMAR/GBRN guideline for online sample quality https://ana.esomar.org/document/7799?query=Online%20research%20guidelines.

15.

Fleischer

Mead

A.D.

Huang

(2015). Inattentive responding in MTurk and other online samples. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), pp.196-202.

16.

Guin

T.D.L.

Baker

Mechling

Ruyle

(2012). Myths and realities of respondent engagement in online surveys. International Journal of Market Research, 54(5), pp.613-633.

17.

Goodman

J.K.

Cryder

C.E.

Cheema

(2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), pp.213-224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753

18.

Groves

R.M.

Singer

Corning

(2000). Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: Description and an illustration. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), pp.299-308.

19.

Hyman

M.R.

Sierra

J.J.

(2012). Adjusting self-reported attitudinal data for mischievous respondents. International Journal of Market Research, 54(1), pp.129-145.

20.

Kostyk

Zhou

Hyman

M.R.

(2019). Using surveytainment to counter declining survey data quality. Journal of Business Research, 95, pp.211-219.

21.

Kropf

M.E.

Blair

(2005). Eliciting survey cooperation: Incentives, self-interest, and norms of cooperation. Evaluation Review, 29(6), pp.559-575.

22.

Lind

J.C.

Zumbo

B.D.

(1993). The continuity principle in psychological research: An introduction to robust statistics. Canadian Psychology, 34(4), pp.407-414.

23.

Liu

Zumbo

B.D.

(2007). The impact of outliers on Cronbach’s coefficient alpha estimate of reliability: Visual analogue scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(4), pp.620-634.

24.

Meade

A.W.

Craig

S.B.

(2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), pp.437-455.

25.

Paas

L.J.

Dolnicar

Karlsson

(2018). Instructional manipulation checks: A longitudinal analysis with implications for MTurk. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(2), pp.258-269.

26.

Paas

L.J.

Morren

(2018). Please do not answer if you are reading this: Respondent attention in online panels. Marketing Letters, 29(1), pp.13-21.

27.

Payne

S.L.

(1951). The art of asking questions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

28.

Peterson

R.A.

(2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), pp.450-461.

29.

Peterson

Griffin

LaFrance

(2017). Smartphone participation in web surveys. In: Beimer

P.P.

, et al. (eds.), Total survey error in practice (pp.203-233). New York, NY: Wiley.

30.

Sears

D.O.

(1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow database on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), pp.515-530.

31.

Singer

Couper

M.P.

(2008). Do incentives exert undue influence on survey participation? Experimental evidence. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(3), pp.49-56.

32.

Smith

S.M.

Roster

C.A.

Golden

L.L.

Albaum

G.S.

(2016). A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), pp.3139-3148.

33.

Van Herk

Poortinga

Y.H.

Verhallen

T.M

. (2004). Response styles in rating scales: Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(3), pp.346-360.

34.

Zhang

Conrad

(2014). Speeding in web surveys: The tendency to answer very fast and its association with straightlining. Survey Research Methods, 8(2), pp.127-135.

Novel Approaches for Improving data Quality from Self-Administered Questionnaires

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References