The study focuses on developing a tool to measure the engagement of diabetes patients and to explore its dimensions. This study was based on descriptive research design and purposive sampling method. Personal interview was conducted among the doctors to ascertain the face and content validity of the questionnaire. Subsequently, interview was conducted with the patients and exploratory factor analysis was used to reduce the number of items in the diabetes patient engagement scale. Diabetes patient engagement measurement model resulted in seven dimensions consisting of 21 items. The dimensions patient satisfaction, patient initiatives, organized health care, informed choice, health promotion, and prevention are unidimensional factors, and the dimension self-management (routine and clinical assessment) is multidimensional. This study confirmed the validity of the new multidimensional diabetes patient engagement scale to assess and measure the intensity of engagement of the patient with their respective care towards doctor and hospital. Practical implication is to facilitate in predicting and determining the engagement level of patient with their health care provider, which increases good health outcomes and quality of life.
Anhang PriceR.ElliottM. N.ZaslavskyA. M.HaysR. D.LehrmanW. G.RybowskiL.. . . ClearyP. D. (2014). Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality. Medical Care Research and Review, 71, 522–554.
2.
BarelloS.GraffignaG.VegniE. (2012). Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: Mapping the literature. Nursing Research and Practice, 2012, Article 905934. doi:10.1155/2012/905934
BleichS. N.OzaltinE.MurrayC. J. L. (2009). How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience?Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87, 271–278.
5.
BrodieR. J.JuricB.IlicA.HollebeekL. D. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66, 105–114.
ConwayM. J.HuffcuttI. A. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 147–168.
12.
CoulterA. (2006). Engaging patients in their healthcare. Picker Institute Europe, 4, 6–4.
EnglishT. M.MasomD.WhitmanM. V. (2018). The impact of patient navigation on diabetes. Journal of Healthcare Management, 63(3), e32–e41. doi:10.1097/JHM-D-16-00033
16.
ForbatL.CaylessS.KnightingK.CornwellJ.KearneyN. (2009). Engaging patients in health care: An empirical study of the role of engagement on attitudes and action. Patient Education and Counseling, 74, 84–90.
17.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3151312
18.
GemmelP.VerleyeK. (2010). Emotional attachment to a hospital: Bringing employees and customers into the engagement zone. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 15, 78–93.
19.
GoodridgeD.IsingerT.RotterT. (2018). “Patient family advisors” perspectives on engagement in health-care quality improvement initiatives: Power and partnership. Health Expectations, 21, 379–386.
HartJ. T. (2002). The autonomous patient: Ending paternalism in medical care. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 95, 623–624.
22.
HibbardJ. H.MahoneyE. RStockardJ.TuslerM. (2005). Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Services Research, 40, 1918–1930.
23.
HibbardJ. H.MahoneyE. RStockardJ.TuslerM. (2007). Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors?Health Services Research, 42, 1443–1463.
NetemeyerR. G.BeardenW. O.SharmaS. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53, 282003.
26.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27.
OhkuboY.KishikawaH.ArakiE.MiyataT.IsamiS.MotoyoshiS.. . .ShichiriM. (1995). Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: A randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 28, 103–117.
28.
ParsonsS.WinterbottomA.CrossP.ReddingD. (2010). The quality of patient engagement and involvement in primary care. London, England: The King’s Fund.
ShobanaR.ChristinaA.VijayV.RamachandranA. (2005). Improving psychosocial care: The Indian experience. Diabetes Voice, 50, 19–21.
31.
SimonD.SchorrG.WirtzM.VodermaierA.CaspariC.NeunerB.. . .HarterM. (2006). Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM0Q). Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 319–327.
32.
SimpsonD. D.JoeG. W. (2004). A longitudinal evaluation of treatment engagement and recovery stages. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 89–97.
33.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th Edition). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
34.
TurnerR. (1998). Blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). The Lancet, 352, 837–853.
35.
ViedermanM. (2002). Active engagement in the consultation process. General Hospital Psychiatry, 24, 93–100.
36.
WagnerE. H.AustinB. T.Von Korff. (1996). Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. The Milbank Quarterly, 74, 511–544.
WongE. L. Y.LuiS.CheungW. I. A.YamH. K. C. (2017). Views and experience on patient engagement in healthcare professionals and patients—How are they different?Open Journal of Nursing, 7, 615–629. doi:10.4236/ojn.2017.76046
39.
World Health Organization. (1999). Definition, Diagnosis and classification of Diabetes Mellitus and its complications. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
40.
WildS., et al. (2004). ‘Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030’, Diabetes care, 27(5), pp. 1047–1053.
