As an industry, marketing research has enjoyed decades of systemic growth. Unfortunately, dissatisfaction with the return on marketing research investments has also been consistently voiced. Part of this complaint may be due to the inadequate way marketing research is being taught. In this article, we review what practitioner–academic gaps have been found in the literature and also present the results of a survey among alumni of a US university. We identify several key gaps including (1) understanding of business issues, (2) ability to define a marketing research problem, (3) ability to design marketing research, (4) ability to analyze data, (5) ability to interpret the results, (6) ability to translate results into actions, (7) ability to effectively interact with clients, and (8) expertise on specific research studies such as customer satisfaction research, branding, and new product development research.
CatterallM.ClarkeW. (2000). Improving the interface between the profession and the university. International Journal of Market Research, 42(1), 1–9.
5.
ClancyK.KriegP. (2000). Counter-intuitive marketing. New York, NY: The Free Press.
6.
DavenportT. H.HarrisJ. G. (2007). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
7.
DavenportT. H.PatilD. J. (2012). Data scientist: The sexiest job in the 21st century. Harvard Business Review, 90, 70–76.
8.
DavisR.MisraS.Van AukenS. (2002). A gap analysis to marketing curriculum assessment: A study of skills and knowledge. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 218–224.
9.
EganM.ManfredK.BascleI.HuetE.MarcilS. (2009). The consumer’s voice—Can your company hear it? (Center for Consumer Insights Benchmarking 2009). Boston Consulting Group. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/documents/file35167.pdf
10.
GiacobbeR. W.SegalM. N. (1994). Rethinking marketing research education: A conceptual, analytical and empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing Education, 16, 43–58.
11.
GroverM.VriensM. (2006). Trusted advisor: How it lays the foundation for insight. In GroverM.VriensM. (Eds.), Handbook of marketing research: Uses and misuses (pp. 3–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
HauserW. J. (2007). Marketing analytics: The evolution of marketing research in the 21st century. Direct Marketing, 1, 38–54.
MalhotraN. K.PetersonM. (2001). Marketing research in the new millennium: Emerging issues and trends. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19, 216–235.
21.
MarshallK. P. (1996). Integrating marketing information systems into conventional marketing research courses: A four-module approach. Journal of Marketing Education, 18, 21–36.
22.
MounceyP. (2018). Addressing a key challenge facing market(ing) research: Re-aligning the academic-practitioner communities (editorial). International Journal of Market Research, 61(1), 3–9.
23.
NunanD.Di DomenicoM. (2013). Market research and the ethics of big data. International Journal of Market Research, 55, 505–519.
24.
NunanD.Di DomenicoM. (2018). Rethinking the market research curriculum. International Journal of Market Research, 61, 22–32.
25.
ParasuramanA. (1981). Commercial market researchers’ evaluations of academic journals and marketing research education. Journal of Marketing Education, 3, 52–58.
26.
SchleeR. P.HarichK. R. (2010). Knowledge and skill requirements for marketing jobs in the 21st century. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 341–352.
SternB. L.TsengL. P. (2002). Do academics and practitioners agree on what and how to teach the undergraduate marketing research course?Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 225–232.
29.
VriensM. (2012). The insights advantage: Knowing how to win. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.
30.
VriensM.ChenS.ViddenC. (2018). From data to decision: Handbook for the modern business analyst. San Diego, CA: Cognella Academic Publishing.
